Note
The constructions should have + past participle and to be supposed to are close in meaning and can often be interchanged. However, the design should have + past participle carries a greater connotation of criticism and regret, while the construction to be supposed to is less categorical and more often found in colloquial speech.
In English, must and have to both perform one function: they show the obligatory nature of a certain action. But despite their similarity, these verbs are used in different speech situations, require different auxiliary verbs and interact with tenses differently. Let's figure out the difference between must and have to.
The modal verb must is much more personal than have to; it is used to express personal feelings and feelings. While have to is impersonal, as a rule, it is used when talking about events and facts.
I must go to work- I have to go to work.
We have to visit our aunt— We need to visit our aunt.
There is also a difference in the negative forms of verbs: mustn’t and don’t have to. If the negation “don’t have to” means that something simply does not need to be done (although it is possible), then the use of the negation “mustn’t” is practically an order “not to do!”
Free lesson on the topic:
Irregular Verbs English: table, rules and examples
Discuss this topic with a personal tutor for free online lesson at Skyeng school
Leave your contact information and we will contact you to sign up for a lesson
You don’t have to be there today! All would be done without you-You don't have to be there today. Everything will be done without you.
You mustn't be late- You can't be late.
The first thing to remember about the modal verb must is that it does not have a past tense form; English grammar assumes that must is used only in the present and future and does not change its form. For the past tense we use had to (the past tense form of the modal verb have to).
You must visit a psychologist now- You should see a psychologist now.
She must visit a psychologist next Sunday - She must visit a psychologist next Sunday.
The verb must reflects an internal obligation, the need to do something. This verb can be used in written instructions, strong recommendations. This is best translated into Russian by the words “must” and “obliged”.
You must brush your teeth— You must brush your teeth.
You must sign these papers— You must sign these documents.
In addition, using the verb must you can convey an assumption/conclusion.
You must be bored- You're probably bored.
Kate must have known her- Kate must have known her.
The verb have to is used much more often in colloquial speech than must. It denotes a need to do something, which is determined not by internal necessity, but by external circumstances. Unlike must, modal verb have to needs auxiliary verbs, can change tenses and change its form.
I have to go- I have to go.
I had to go- I had to go.
I will have to go- I'll have to go.
You must ask her about this situation“You should ask her about this situation.”
We must end it right now“We have to finish this now.”
You must build a boat to escape the island“You must build a boat to escape from this island.”
She must do her homework— She must do her homework.
We have to buy food and coffee— We need to buy food and coffee.
We had to use it right“We had to use it correctly.”
I will have to teach you how to be villains“I will have to teach you how to be a villain.”
There is a whole category of words in English that can safely be called special, different from other groups of vocabulary. These words are modal verbs: Can, Could, Must, May, Might, Should, Need, Have to. Although they are not used as independent lexical units, since they express only the necessity, ability or possibility of performing an action, their role in the language is incredibly large. What are these words and when are they used?
Can is rightfully considered the most common word in the modal group. Thanks to him, we can report that we know/can do something or are capable of something.
Can is used to indicate:
But it is necessary to remember that the modal verb can itself does not denote an action, therefore it must be followed by another verb that directly indicates the execution of the process. This rule applies to all other words discussed below.
The modal verb must denotes obligation, namely:
Must is used not only in the present tense, but also in the future. It is important to remember that in all cases its shape does not change.
The modal verb may indicates the possibility of performing an action or the assumption of such a possibility. IN general meaning it can be translated as you can/can/can, etc. May is used when it is necessary to express:
Might is the past tense form of May. Also used to indicate the possibility/request/suggestion of performing an action. One of the special meanings of the word Might is an expression of slight condemnation or disapproval. It is interesting that although the modal verb might is considered a past tense form, it is used to denote the execution of a process both in the present and in the future.
The modal verb should is similar in meaning to Must, but is not as strict. Thus, Should is used when the task is to express an obligation or duty, stylistically weakened to a recommendation or advice. Should is also used to denote reproach or regret due to the fact that the desired action was not previously performed or can no longer be performed.
The modal verb need should be used to express a need or urgent need to carry out an action. Accordingly, if Need is present in negative construction, it denotes the lack of need/permission to do something. Need is also found in interrogative constructions - here it indicates doubts about the advisability of performing the process in question.
home distinctive feature Have to in that it denotes the obligation to perform actions due to specific circumstances. Based on this, the modal verb have to is recommended to be used only when it is necessary to indicate the compulsion of actions due to the current situation, and not personal desires. Have to can be used in all tenses, but each has its own form: present - Have to or Has to, past - Had to, future - Will have to.
Without a doubt, without modal verbs it is impossible to construct competent and stylistically neat speech. Therefore, when choosing methods of learning English that you can familiarize yourself with, be sure to include the study of this category of vocabulary in the chosen method. Moreover, now you have a useful theoretical basis that will help you successfully cope with the task.
Must is a very “hard” verb that expresses the obligation or need to do something. Must stronger than should. If in case should there is still some choice (to do or not to do), then in the case must no choice! That's an order.
Have to has the same meaning as must.
Example
I must leave. - I must go.
I have to leave. - I must go.
In this situation must And have to are used interchangeably.
Must is more personal in nature. Must used to express personal feelings and sensations.
Example
I must do my best. - I have to do my best.
IN in this case the speaker expresses his feelings about this.
Have to is impersonal in nature. Have to used when talking about facts rather than personal feelings.
Example
I have to visit my doctor. - I have to visit my doctor.
Apparently, not everything is in order with your health, and this is a fact that you cannot argue with, and not some kind of personal feeling.
Note
Sometimes the difference is in use must And have to so subtle that it is difficult to determine which verb to use. In such situations it is better to use have to.
Remember, verb must has no past tense form!
Therefore, it can be used for the present and future tenses, but not for the past.
Example
We must visit a doctor now. - We must visit the doctor now.
We must visit a doctor tomorrow. - We have to visit the doctor tomorrow.
Unlike must, have to can be used for all forms, including the past tense.
Example
I had to visit my doctor. - I had to visit my doctor.
We can't say here must, because time is past! Therefore, we calmly use the equivalent must - have to!
Must used when the speaker draws a conclusion based on available facts. And although he has complete confidence that his conclusion is the absolute truth, this is not far from happening. The Russian analogue is the “should be” construction. And where it should be, there it is must!
Example
The ground is wet. It must be raining. - The ground is wet. It must be raining.
The ground is wet - so we concluded that it is raining! And since our logic is ironclad, we use must! After all, it's raining must go, he just can’t help but go!
Mustn't= don't do this! That's an order! (don't do it)
Don't have to= there is no need to do this or it is not necessary (but in principle it is possible)
Examples
You mustn't be late. - You shouldn't be late.
(Don't be late! You can't be late!)
You don't have to be on time. - You don't have to be on time.
Those. you may be late. But in principle you can arrive on time.
We have examined 3 basic modal verbs. Let's repeat these points again, and then look at the remaining modal verbs:
There is one very good modal verb that satisfies all these conditions without any exceptions. This verb is must . It is most often translated into Russian as “must, obliged.” As a rule, we use it when we want to express unquestioning obedience to something.
As you can see, we use must when talking about sustainable traditions and laws, be they moral or legal.
From must different verb - have to . It is not modal appearance, but is such in meaning. He also conveys an obligation, but of a different kind. Let's look at the difference in meaning between must And have to .
As stated earlier, must - this is an expression of subordination to GENERAL laws; that is, you realize that you must do something because it is socially accepted.
Have to - this is an expression of subordination due to PRIVATE circumstances. A more suitable translation for it is “to be forced, to have to.” That is, you must do something because something forces you to do it.
But despite the difference, must And have to interchangeable. Unlike must , have to changes over time and takes on different endings. Therefore, if you really need to show this time and at the same time maintain modality, then instead must use have to .
Naturally, have to - this is an ordinary verb, so we deal with it according to tradition: we add, if necessary, endings, auxiliary verbs, etc. Auxiliary in this case - do .