Stairs.  Entry group.  Materials.  Doors.  Locks.  Design

Stairs. Entry group. Materials. Doors. Locks. Design

» Water consumption schedule for cotton irrigation. Methods and techniques for irrigating cotton. naandanjain Cotton Drip Irrigation Product Line

Water consumption schedule for cotton irrigation. Methods and techniques for irrigating cotton. naandanjain Cotton Drip Irrigation Product Line

Keywords

Soil / cotton / irrigation / soil salinization / soil mechanical composition/ mineralization / yield / Soil / Gossypium / irrigation / soil salinization / soil texture / mineralization / crop yield

annotation scientific article on agriculture, forestry, fisheries, author of the scientific work - Mamatov Farmon Murtozevich, Ismailova Khalavat Jabbarovna, Ismailov Feruz Sobirovich

The purpose of the study is to study the effect of irrigation on the salt regime of the soil in various experimental plots. Obtaining cotton fiber with high technological quality is closely related to the salt regime of the soil, since excess content of easily soluble salts in soils leads to a decrease in cotton yield. Studies have shown that changes in the salt regime of soils are significantly influenced by the irrigation regime of fine-fiber cotton. It has been established that on the irrigated lands of the Karshi steppe, which are subject to low salinity, when cultivating cotton, pre-sowing reserve preventive irrigation should be used annually as a mandatory agrotechnical practice at a rate of 1200...1500 m3/ha. The effect in soil desalinization achieved by these irrigations must be consolidated by using optimal irrigation regimes for fine-fiber cotton during its growing season in combination with other agrotechnical measures carried out using intensive technology. With the introduction of such interconnected agro-reclamation measures, a prerequisite is created for the maximum prevention of the process of moving water-soluble salts from the lower, more saline layers to the upper ones.

Related topics scientific works on agriculture, forestry, fisheries, author of scientific work - Mamatov Farmon Murtozevich, Ismailova Khalavat Jabbarovna, Ismailov Feruz Sobirovich

  • Salt regime and operational leaching of soil in cotton crop rotation in the old irrigated zone of the Golodnaya Steppe

    2014 / Ashirbekov Mukhtar Zholdybaevich
  • Soil and climatic conditions of Surkhandarya

    2018 / Normuratov Oybek Ulugberdievich, Zakirov Kholmat Khurramovich, Chorieva Shakhlo Kultura Kizi, Nurullaev Azamkhon Komiljon Ugli, Abdurakhmonova Yulduz Mamarazhabovna, Bolliev Asliddin Tursunmamatovich
  • Direct and inverse problems of the salt transfer model under conditions of stationary water-salt regime of soils

    2014 / Mikailov F. D.
  • The influence of irrigation on the basic properties of takyr soils in the lower reaches of Kashkadarya

    2018 / S. Zakirova, M. A. Mazirov, S. Abdulaev
  • Salt regime of irrigated lands against the background of siphon-vacuum drainage in low-slope terrain

    2017 / Gurbanov Mirza Firudin-Ogly
  • Long-term forecast of reclamation activities in the Republic of Azerbaijan

    2014 / Mustafaev M.G.
  • Ways to improve the efficiency of irrigation water on irrigated lands of the Republic of Karakalpakstan

    2015 / Mambetnazarov A.B.
  • Modeling the process of managing the water-salt regime of soils under irrigation conditions

    2016 / Borodychev V.V., Dedova E.B., Sazanov M.A., Lytov M.N.
  • The current state of irrigated lands in the Kura-Araks lowland of Azerbaijan

    2017 / Nurieva Kamala Gulam
  • Assessment of the current soil-reclamation state of the soils of the Golodnaya Steppe

    2019 / A. U. Akhmedov, L. A. Gafurova

The aim of the research is to study the effect of irrigation on the salt regime of the soil at various experimental sites. The production of cotton fiber with high technological quality is closely connected with the salt regime of the soil, because the excessive content of readily soluble salts in soils leads to a decrease in the yield of cotton. Studies have shown that the regime of irrigation of fine-fiber cotton exerts a noticeable influence on the change in the salt regime of soils. It has been established that in the irrigated lands of the Karshi step, which are susceptible to salinity to a weak degree, cotton should be used every year as a mandatory agrotechnical method for presowing emergency preventive irrigation with the norms of 1200...1500 m3 /ha. The effect of soil desalinization achieved by these waterings should be secured by applying optimal irrigation regimes for fine-fiber cotton during its growing season in conjunction with other agrotechnical measures carried out by intensive technology. With the introduction of such interlinked agromeliorative measures, a precondition is created for maximum prevention of the movement of water-soluble salts from the lower, more saline layers to the upper ones.

Text of scientific work on the topic “The influence of cotton irrigation on the salt regime of the soil”

UDC 502/504: 631.42: 631.675

Effect of cotton irrigation on soil salt regime

Received June 20, 2018

© Mamatov Farmon Murtozevich, Ismailova Khalavat Jabbarovna, Ismailov Feruz Sobirovich

Karshi Engineering and Economic Institute, Karshi, Republic of Uzbekistan

Annotation. The purpose of the study is to study the effect of irrigation on the salt regime of the soil in various experimental plots. Obtaining cotton fiber with high technological quality is closely related to the salt regime of the soil, since excess content of easily soluble salts in soils leads to a decrease in cotton yield. Studies have shown that changes in the salt regime of soils are significantly influenced by the irrigation regime of fine-fiber cotton. It has been established that on the irrigated lands of the Karshi steppe, which are subject to low salinity, when cultivating cotton, pre-sowing reserve preventive irrigation with norms of 1200...1500 m3/ha should be used annually as a mandatory agrotechnical practice. The effect in soil desalinization achieved by these irrigations must be consolidated by using optimal irrigation regimes for fine-fiber cotton during its growing season in combination with other agrotechnical measures carried out using intensive technology. When implementing such interconnected agro-reclamation measures, a prerequisite is created for maximally preventing the process of moving water-soluble salts from the lower, more saline layers to the upper ones.

Keywords. Soil, cotton, irrigation, soil salinization, soil mechanical composition, mineralization, productivity.

The effect of irrigation of cotton on the salt regime of the soil

Received on June 20, 2018

© Mamatov Farmon Murtozevich, Ismailova Khalavat Dzhabbarovna, Ismailov Feruz Sobirovich

Karshi engineering-economic Institute, Karshi, Republic of Uzbekistan

Abstract. The aim of the research is to study the effect of irrigation on the salt regime of the soil at various experimental sites. The production of cotton fiber with high technological quality is closely connected with the salt regime of the soil, because the excessive content of readily soluble salts in soils leads to a decrease in the yield of cotton. Studies have shown that the regime of irrigation of fine-fiber cotton exerts a noticeable influence on the change in the salt regime of soils. It has been established that in the irrigated lands of the Karshi step, which are susceptible to salinity to a weak degree, cotton should be used every year as a mandatory agrotechnical method for pre-sowing emergency preventive irrigation with the norms of 1200... 1500 m3/ha. The effect of soil desalinization achieved by these waterings should be secured by applying optimal irrigation regimes for fine-fiber cotton during its growing season in conjunction with other agrotechnical measures carried out by intensive technology. With the introduction of such interlinked agro-meliorative measures, a precondition is created for maximum prevention of the movement of water-soluble salts from the lower, more saline layers to the upper ones.

Keywords. Soil, Gossypium, irrigation, soil salinization, soil texture, mineralization, crop yield.

Introduction. In soil

climatic conditions of the Karshi steppe, obtaining high yields of fine-fiber cotton with high technological fiber quality is closely related to the salt regime of the soil, since the excess content of easily soluble salts in soils causes

leads to a decrease in the yield of agricultural crops, in particular cotton. This is due not only to the toxic effect of salts, but also to an increase in the concentration of the soil solution, accompanied by an increase in its osmotic pressure. As a result, the suction power

The activity of root hairs is reduced, they cannot use the necessary water from the soil, which causes a deterioration in the water regime of plants, and in some cases their complete death.

Materials and research methods. In the process of research, methods of mathematical system analysis and mathematical statistics, comparative comparison and generalization were used.

Results and discussion. To characterize the soils of the experimental plots according to the degree of salinity, the use of

the typical content of salts in them (table). From the data obtained it is clear that the soil of area 1, due to its heavier mechanical composition and close (1.5...2.0 m) occurrence of mineralized (6...10 g/l of dense residue) groundwater was relatively more salinized than in area 2; in area 1, the upper meter layer contained 0.496% of dense residue and 0.0048% of chlorine ion. There were even more salts in the soil layer underlying below a meter layer: up to 0.725% of dry residue and 0.063% of chlorine ion.

Layer, cm Dense residue, % Total alkalinity % Chlorion content, % Sulfuric acid residue %

Section 1

0...20 0,654 0,037 0,028 0,378

20...40 0,876 0,032 0,053 0,513

40...60 0,470 0,038 0,046 0,143

60...80 0,473 0,039 0,057 0,237

80...100 0,477 0,038 0,048 0,260

0...100 0,496 0,037 0,048 0,296

100...200 0,725 0,025 0,063 0,402

0...200 0,610 0,031 0,054 0,349

Section 2

0...20 0,120 0,034 0,012 0,056

20...40 0,108 0,037 0,018 0,039

40...60 0,122 0,029 0,033 0,034

60...80 0,140 0,029 0,033 0,042

80...100 0,116 0,032 0,014 0,048

0...100 0,121 0,032 0,025 0,043

100...200 0,500 0,019 0,024 0,295

200...300 0,171 0,023 0,015 0,073

0...200 0,315 0,026 0,024 0,169

0...300 0,264 0,037 0,022 0,205

Salt accumulation in the soil of area 2 looks different; here in the upper 0-100 and lower 200...300 cm layers of soil there is a small salt content - 0.121 and 0.171% of dense residue and 0.025% and 0.015% of chlorine ion, respectively. In the middle part of the aeration zone in the layer of 100...200 cm, relatively more salt accumulation is noted, the total amount of salts increases to 0.5%. Consequently, according to the initial salt content, the soil of plot 1 is subject to weak salinity. In area 2, the upper 0...100 cm and lower 200...300 cm layers are practically not saline, its middle part (100...200 cm) is slightly saline. The soils of the experimental plots belong to the chloride-sulfate type of salinity. The composition of salts is dominated by sulfates, the reserve

which constitutes more than half of the dry residue. Sulfate anions in the soil of area 2 exceeded 4.8...8.1 times, area 2 - 1.8...5.0 times. Since the soil in plot 1 is slightly saline, and in plot 2 it is subject to salinization in a deeper (100...200 cm) layer; when favorable conditions are created, water-soluble salts can easily move to the upper layers of the soil and pose a threat to the normal growth and development of cotton.

The results of our three-year studies showed that different irrigation regimes for fine-fiber cotton played a certain role in changing the salt regime of soils in experimental plots.

Experiments carried out on a site with a groundwater level of 1.5...2.0 m showed that, under the influence of irrigation regimes,

changes in the occurrence of sensitive changes in the salt regime of soils. Thus, in experiments with a pre-irrigation soil moisture regime of 70-70-65% NV (option 2), the content of dense residue in the 0...60 cm layer from spring to autumn decreased from 1.153 to 1.121%, in the 60-100 cm layer from 1.105 to 1.046%, and in the 100-200 cm layer it increased from 1.019 to 1.240%. However, the amount of chlorine ion at the end of the growing season in the 0...60 cm layer increases from 0.027 to 0.096%, in the 0...100 cm layer - from 0.028 to 0.075, in the 100...200 cm layer - from 0.029 to 0.062 %.

In option 1, where the pre-irrigation soil moisture regime is 6070-65% NV, the salt content in the soil increases significantly from spring to autumn. The same picture is observed in options 3 and 4. Thus, if at the beginning of the growing season the layer 0...60 cm contained 1.153% of dense residue, by autumn it was found in option 3 - 1.27% and in option 4 -1.261%. However, in deeper soil layers (100... 200 cm) the salt content is lower (1.227... 1.262%) than in option 1 (1.328%). A comparative analysis of the data obtained showed that the most favorable soil reclamation regime is observed in options 2-3, where the pre-irrigation soil moisture regime is 7070-65 and 70-75-65% NV.

Data on the salt regime of the soil in an area with deep groundwater, where the upper 0...100 cm layer is practically not saline, are given in the table in such conditions, as shown by three-year data. The salt content in the 0...100 cm layer, both in terms of dry residue and chlorine ion, does not change significantly from spring to autumn under different irrigation regimes and is maintained in a stable position. A more noticeable change in the salt regime occurs in the 100...200 cm layer, where the soil is relatively more saline than in the previous layer. Here, in all years of research under all soil moisture regimes, the movement of salts into the underlying layers was noted, i.e. water-soluble salts are washed out.

If we consider the change in salts in the context of different irrigation regimes, we can see that options with pre-irrigation turned out to be more effective in desalinizing the 100...200 cm layer.

humidity 70-75-65% and 75-75-65% HB. Desalinization is worse at a humidity level of 60-70-65 HB. Option 2, where cotton was watered at a moisture content of 70-70-65% HB, occupied an intermediate position.

The desalinizing effect of preventive watering must be secured by carefully carried out vegetation watering. In our experimental plots, early spring reserve preventive irrigations were carried out annually closer to cotton sowing, with norms of 1200...1500 m3/ha. If we take into account that in an area with deep groundwater, the soil is composed, with the exception of the arable layer, of light loam, has a loose composition, lighter from top to bottom and has good water permeability, then with such rates of preventive irrigation it is quite possible to achieve soil desalinization to a depth of 2 m. Naturally, this was also facilitated by vegetation irrigation, carried out according to standards for the deficit of the design layer in combination with high-quality inter-row tillage, timely fertilizing of plants, weed control and other types of agrotechnical measures.

Conclusion

It has been established that on irrigated lands of the Karshi steppe, subject to low salinity, when cultivating cotton, pre-sowing reserve preventive irrigation should be used annually as a mandatory agrotechnical practice at a rate of 1200...1500 m3/ha. The effect in soil desalinization achieved by these irrigations must be consolidated by using optimal irrigation regimes for fine-fiber cotton during its growing season in combination with other agrotechnical measures carried out using intensive technology. When implementing such interconnected agro-reclamation measures, a prerequisite is created for maximally preventing the process of moving water-soluble salts from the lower, more saline layers to the upper ones. Thanks to this, farmers will be able to maintain upper layers soil in the most favorable reclamation condition throughout the entire growing season.

Bibliography

1. Averyanov A.P. On the issue of determining the irrigation rate // Soil Science. 1968. No. 9. P. 55-59.

2. Mirzajonov K.M. Reclamation condition and methods for improving soils in the regions of the Republic // Cotton growing and seed production. 1999. No. 4. pp. 31-33.

3. Alimov M.S. Evaporation of groundwater in the Hungry Steppe // Khlopokvodstvo. 1966. No. 4.

4. Avliekulov A.E. Promising farming systems in Uzbekistan. Tashkent: Publishing house. “Navruz”, 2013. - pp. 477-499.

5. Bespalov N.F., Ryzhov S.N. Hydromodular regions and irrigation regime for cotton in the Hungry Steppe // Soil Science. 1970. No. 6. pp. 82-91.

6. Mambetnazarov A.B., Aitmuratov M.T. Hydromodular areas and irrigation regime for cotton on irrigated lands of farms in the Republic of Karakalpakstan // News of the Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-University Complex. 2014. No. 3 (35). pp. 1-6.

References in novel script

1. Averianov A.P. K voprosu oprede-leniia polivnoi normy // Pochvovedenie. 1968. No. 9. S. 55-59.

2. Mirzazhonov K.M. Meliorativnoe sostoianie i sposoby uluchshenie pochv oblastei Respubliki // Khlopkovodstva i semenovodstvo. 1999. No. 4. S. 31-33.

3. Alimov M.S. Isparenie gruntovykh vod v Golodnoi stepi // Khlopokvodstvo. 1966. No. 4.

4. Avliekulov A.E. Perspektivnye sistemy zemledeliia v Uzbekistane. Tashkent: Izd. "Navruz", 2013. - S. 477499.

5. Bespalov N.F., Ryzhov S.N. Gidromodulnye raiony i rezhim orosheniia khlopchatnika v Golodnoi stepi // Pochvovedenie. 1970. No. 6. S. 82-91.

6. Mambetnazarov A.B., Aitmuratov M.T. Gidromodulnye raiony i rezhim orosheniia khlopchatnika na oroshaemykh zemliakh fermerskikh khoziaistv v Respublike Karakalpakstan // Izvestiia Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa. 2014. No. 3 (35). S. 1-6.

Additional Information

Mamatov Farmon Murtozevich, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Center for Scientific and Applied Research and Innovation; Karshi Engineering and Economic Institute; Republic of Uzbekistan, Karshi, st. Mustakillik, 225; tel. 8-375-2240289, +99891-4594682; e-mail: [email protected].

Ismailova Khalovat Jabbarovna, candidate of agricultural sciences, associate professor; Karshi Engineering and Economic Institute; Republic of Uzbekistan, Karshi, st. Musta-killik, 225; tel. 8-375-2240289, +99891-4594682; e-mail: ikhalava [email protected].

Ismailov Feruz Sobirovich, assistant; Karshi Engineering and Economic Institute; Republic of Uzbekistan, Karshi, st. Mustakillik, 225; tel. 8-375-2240289, +99891-4594682; e-mail: [email protected].

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits the copying, distribution, reproduction, performance and adaptation of article material in any media or format, provided you give appropriate credit to the author(s) of the work covered by the Creative Commons license and indicate if original material changes have been made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless a different term applies to the material. If material is not included in the Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by law in your country or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder(s).

For citation: Mamatov F.M., Ismailova Kh.D., Ismailov F.S. The influence of cotton irrigation on the salt regime of the soil // Ecology and construction. - 2018. - No. 2. - pp. 50-54.

Additional Information

Information about the authors:

Mamatov Farmon Murtozevich, doctor of technical sciences, professor, Director of the center for applied research and innovation; Karshi engineering-economic Institute; Republic of Uzbekistan, Karshi, Mustakillik st., 225; phones: 8-375-2240289, +99891-4594682; e-mail: [email protected].

Ismailova Khalavat Dzhabbarovna, candidate of agricultural Sciences, docent; Karshi engineering-economic Institute; Republic of Uzbekistan, Karshi, Mustakillik st., 225; phones: 8-3752240289, +99891-4594682; e-mail: [email protected].

Ismailov Feruz Sobirovich, assistant; Karshi engineering-economic Institute; Republic of Uzbekistan, Karshi, Mustakillik st., 225; phones: 8-375-2240289, +99891-4594682; e-mail: [email protected].

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article"s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article"s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

For citations: Mamatov F.M., Ismailova H.D., Ismailov F.S. The effect of irrigation of cotton on the salt regime of the soil // Ekologiya i stroitelstvo. - 2018. - No. 2. - P. 50-54.

There are the following methods of irrigation of agricultural crops: surface (gravity), sprinkling and subsoil irrigation.
Surface (gravity) irrigation. This method has existed for a long time and is still used on most cotton crops. With this type of irrigation, furrow irrigation is most ideal. Irrigation of cotton by flooding is prohibited.
In surface irrigation, water is supplied for irrigation different ways: a) through channels laid in earthen channels; b) along reinforced concrete irrigation trays; c) through underground self-pressure pipelines with hydrants; d) watering machines. In unlined earthen channels without anti-filtration clothing, it is lost a large number of irrigation water. Tray and closed underground irrigation networks have significant advantages.
The construction of a flume network on a large scale is being carried out in the new state farms of the Golodnaya Steppe. Water enters the trays installed on the supports from the earthen channel through the head inscribed into the slope of the channel. From the trays, water is distributed using water outlets through irrigation pipelines (flexible hoses), replacing temporary sprinklers (ok-aryks),
Irrigation from a closed irrigation network is used on lands with pronounced slopes (more than 0.003). Underground self-pressure pipelines are asbestos-cement. Hydrants are installed on pipelines at certain distances (50-100 m), to the heads of which flexible pipelines are connected. From the latter, water flows into irrigation furrows.
Irrigation machines are widely used in cotton fields. The PPA-165 waterer (a mobile irrigation unit with a water flow rate of 165 l/s) is very economical and efficient. The unit consists of two machines: a pumping station mounted on a T-28X tractor and a trailed hose cart. Expandable flexible hoses (polyethylene or nylon) have holes for releasing water into the furrows. The size of the furrow jets (from minimum to 1.0 l/s and more) can be adjusted using special sector valves. The productivity of the PPA-165 machine per hour of operation at an irrigation rate of 1200 m3/ha is 0.5 ha.
PPA-165 can be used on fields with both low and pronounced slopes. It is especially effective in areas with uneven terrain, when gravity supply of water from sprinklers to the field is difficult.
With surface irrigation, the most productive use of water, land and agricultural machinery is achieved when irrigating cotton on large (8-12 hectares or more) well-planned irrigation plots equipped with water control structures. The method of watering is along furrows cut between the rows of plants.
It is most effective and profitable to supply water to the furrows not from earthen sprinklers, but from flexible or semi-rigid pipelines laid across the rows of cotton. They are laid across the width of the irrigation area in several tiers. Water is supplied to them from trays, hydrants, underground pipelines or irrigation machines.
Semi-rigid polyethylene pipelines are reinforced metal mesh and screw outlets. Compared to flexible pipelines, they are more durable in operation, do not require a special bed for installation, and can withstand more high pressure water, more productive.
When supplying water to furrows from temporary sprinklers, longitudinal and transverse layouts can be used.
At longitudinal pattern temporary sprinklers are cut along the direction of the irrigation furrows. From the sprinklers, water flows into the outlet furrows, and from them into the irrigation furrows.
At transverse pattern temporary sprinklers (enlarged) are cut across the irrigation furrows. In areas with low slopes, this scheme is more profitable and convenient for organizing irrigation and efficient use of water.
When cotton row spacing is 60 cm, irrigation should be carried out in the deepest possible furrows with a small irrigation stream. In this case, the sides of the furrows and the ridges of the rows are not flooded with water and a soil crust does not form on them. Soil lumps are moistened by capillary action, and during subsequent cultivation of the field, the soil better retains its structure.
Furrows in fields with small slopes are cut to a depth of 20-22 cm (at the first watering 15-17 cm). In areas with very large slopes and poor soil permeability, the depth of the furrows is reduced to 13-15 cm.
The length of the furrows (the distance between the ditch) and the size of the furrow stream are differentiated depending on the water-physical properties of the soil, the magnitude of the slope and the degree of planning of the areas. The greater (up to a certain value) the slope, the lower the water permeability and the better the soil leveling, the greater the length of the irrigation furrows and the smaller the size of the stream in each furrow.
On very large slopes, to avoid soil erosion, watering is carried out with a small furrow stream. The length of the furrows has to be reduced, since with small jets the amount of water absorption into the soil from the top to the bottom of the furrows is significantly reduced. And this, with a long furrow length, leads to significant uneven soil moisture.
The length of the furrows and the size of the furrow jet must be such that the soil is evenly moistened along the length of the furrows and watering is carried out without discharge or with a small discharge of water, there is no erosion of the furrows, washing away of soil and applied fertilizers.
With row spacings of 60 cm, furrows are cut from 60-80 to 250-300 m in length, depending on conditions.
At the beginning of each irrigation, moistening is carried out with a large stream, but when it reaches the end of the furrow, the intensity of the stream is reduced in accordance with the changed amount of water absorption by the soil. At the very beginning of irrigation, a very small jet size is sometimes used to eliminate the erosive effect of water.
In fields with close groundwater, where the estimated depth of soil wetting is 0.3-0.5 m, it is recommended to irrigate not with an alternating stream, but with a constant stream - until the water reaches the end of the furrow. In this case, water consumption for irrigation is reduced, and the danger of excessive soil moisture, uneven development and fattening of cotton is eliminated.
For various conditions, the following lengths of furrows and furrow jet can be recommended (Table 22).


Research by M.V. Mukhamedzhanov and S.A. Gildiev, as well as the practice of many leading farms, have shown that in some cases it is advisable to carry out furrow irrigation of cotton through row spacing. With such irrigation, favorable water conditions are better preserved. physical properties soils, plants do not grow and do not lie down, they give a high yield with earlier ripening. The labor productivity of irrigators also increases.
On meadow soils with close groundwater, inter-row irrigation is advisable throughout the entire irrigation period; on gray-meadow soils with a groundwater depth of 2-3 m - during the first or first two irrigations and during irrigation during cotton ripening. On pebbly, sandy, clayey or salinized soils, as well as on gray soils with deep groundwater, all irrigation should be carried out in each furrow.
On wide-row (90 cm) crops, in comparison with narrow-row (60 cm), irrigation techniques have a number of differences. A different depth and length of irrigation furrows, the size of the furrow stream, and, in connection with this, irrigation rates are established. On such crops, it is possible to cut deeper furrows (up to 20 cm during the first watering, and up to 25-26 cm during subsequent watering) and ensure high quality irrigation without flooding the rows of plants. Increased furrow jets are allowed (up to 1.0-1.5 l/s or more), irrigation along elongated furrows - with small and medium slopes on developed virgin highly permeable soils up to 200-250 m, on old arable soils of medium and heavy mechanical composition soils up to 300-400 m.


Further lengthening of irrigation furrows is irrational, since due to the long duration of irrigation and increased furrow strings, irrigation rates, despite the smaller (on each hectare) length of irrigation furrows, increase significantly.
To distribute water evenly across the furrows and reduce labor costs for irrigation, it is important to equip the heads of the furrows with control devices. They can be paper napkins (made from waxed paper from bags of fertilizer), tubes (from roofing iron, etc.), wooden or iron shields (with an angular or rectangular cutout), and best of all, rubber or polyethylene siphon tubes (Fig. 42 , 43). Their length is 100-130 cm, diameter from 20 to 50 mm, water consumption (with a difference in horizons in the outlet and irrigation furrows of 5-10 cm) from 0.15-0.21 to 1.1-1.6 l/s .

When irrigating along long furrows (250-300 m) using siphon tubes, up to 2.0-3.5 hectares can be irrigated per shift, that is, 3-4 times more than when irrigating without furrow control devices. At the same time, the waterer’s work is mechanized, watering is facilitated and the quality of watering is improved, especially at night.
Proper organization of cotton irrigation is important. The practice of advanced farms has shown that when carrying out irrigation, it is extremely unprofitable to spray water in small currents over many channels and areas, since this significantly increases the total losses of water from the irrigation network. The results are much better when concentrated watering, when water is supplied to large distributors and to individual field crews with direct current, and water circulation is carried out within each crew (the next water supply). With such water use, each enlarged plot requires a large consumption of water, which makes it possible to irrigate simultaneously from all irrigation ditches along the entire length of the plot. This ensures simultaneous drying of the soil for post-irrigation cultivation, significantly increasing the efficiency of the irrigation network and the daily irrigation area.
For more productive use of irrigation water, irrigation is often carried out around the clock, turning Special attention on the quality and organization of them at night. For this purpose, as a rule, two shifts of waterers are created. The size of the simultaneously irrigated area should be at least 6-8 hectares. Watering of the next plot begins only during daylight hours.
Irrigation by sprinkling. When sprinkling, water is thrown into the air by a machine, crushed there into small drops and falls on plants and soil in the form of rain.
This method of irrigating cotton is beneficial when fresh or slightly mineralized groundwater is close to the ground (up to 1-2 m), especially on soils with good water-lifting capacity. Under such conditions, irrigation by sprinkling, compared to surface irrigation, is carried out at lower rates (mostly 300-500 m3/ha per irrigation), corresponding to the required depth of soil moisture (30-50 cm).
Good results were obtained with sprinkling and on lands with deep groundwater, but with a decrease in rain intensity and an increase in irrigation rates (up to 700-1000 m3/ha) to increase the depth of soil moisture. Sprinkling is also promising on well-drained pebble, sandy and sandy loam soils, since this eliminates the loss of water deep into the soil, beyond the root zone of plants.
The advantages of sprinkling are that the irrigation process is mechanized, cutting of a small irrigation network is not required, and the requirements for site planning are reduced. When sprinkling, the microclimate of the field improves, the soil becomes less compacted, the activity of aerobic bacteria increases, and excess moisture is eliminated. Labor productivity in sprinkling irrigation is much higher, and water consumption is much less.
However, sprinkling cannot be used on lands prone to salinity, since they require maintaining a leaching irrigation regime. It may also be ineffective in new irrigation zones, where deep soil moisture is required during irrigation.
To irrigate cotton plants by sprinkling on fields with relatively flat terrain, the DDA-100M sprinkler unit is mainly used (a double-cantilever sprinkler unit with a water flow rate of 100 l/s, modernized). This is a short-spray mounted self-propelled installation for irrigation while moving along irrigation canals. Its working coverage (on both sides of the canal) is 120 m, the coverage area is 0.21 hectares (120x17 - 18 m). The number of spray nozzles is 54. Productivity per 1 hour of operation at an irrigation rate of 300 m3/ha is 1.2 ha. The irrigation area per season is 120-140 hectares.
At the Pakhta-Aral state farm-technical school, DDA-100M sprinkler machines have been widely used to irrigate cotton and other crops since 1961. Every year, 30-45 units work on irrigation. In recent years, irrigation has been carried out annually on an area of ​​6-7 thousand hectares, including 4 thousand hectares of cotton. Sprinkler irrigation reduced vegetation irrigation norms by 1.5-2 times, increased cotton yield by 1.5-2.0 c/ha and labor productivity by 3 times compared to furrow irrigation.
The DShK-64 “Volzhanka” wide-spread sprinkling machine is effective for irrigating cotton. This unit, about 800 m long, has two sections (two wings) with medium-jet sprinklers located on them every 12.6 m. There are 64 of them in total. The rain intensity of them is low - 0.25-0.30 mm/min. Water is taken for sprinkling from hydrants of a closed irrigation network. The machine is moved from one position to another using a drive trolley.
The most effective use of Volzhanka is when working in groups (10-15 vehicles). During the season, one unit can provide irrigation for 60-70 hectares on lands with deep groundwater and up to 100-120 hectares with close groundwater.
A four-year (1972-1975) study of sprinkling with this machine on typical gray soils at the SoyuzNIHI experimental base showed that with irrigation rates of up to 900-1,000 m3/ha, sufficiently deep (up to 80-100 cm) soil moisture was ensured. As a result of increasing the efficiency of irrigated fields, water costs for irrigation decreased by 16-33%, and cotton yield increased by 1.2-6.4 c/ha.
Irrigation of cotton can also be carried out with a wide-spread sprinkler DOS-400. It is tracked, with a suspended pipeline with a diameter of 89-159 mm, equipped with short or medium jet nozzles. The machine can work positionally and in a combined way (first positionally, then in motion). Irrigation coverage width is 400 m, water flow is 150 l/s, rain intensity is 1.5-1.8 mm/min.
Subsurface irrigation. It is currently being developed on a new basis: the trenchless installation of tubular humidifiers made of plastic materials. Perforated (with holes) humidifier tubes are laid in the soil to a depth of 40-45 cm and connected at the top to the distribution pipeline, and at the bottom to the discharge (flushing) pipeline or to an open trench. The diameter of the tubes is 15-30 mm, the distance between them is 90-150 cm.
In subsurface irrigation, water from nutrients fertilizers are supplied directly to the roots of plants, the soil from the surface is not compacted and remains loose, the weediness of fields is reduced (weed seeds with irrigation water do not fall on the soil surface), labor costs for hoeing, weeding and soil cultivation are eliminated or greatly reduced, as well as costs irrigation water. Cotton productivity (compared to surface irrigation) increases.
This method of irrigation can be widely used in soils that are not subject to salinity, with well-defined capillary properties, and with relatively deep groundwater (2.0-3.0 m or more).
Great attention should be paid to measures to prevent possible siltation and blockage of subsurface wetting agents and perforations. For this purpose, clarified water should be supplied for subsoil irrigation, and preventive (at the end of the season) flushing of the humidifier cavity and clogged holes with water should be carried out. Such washings can be combined with regular waterings with additional water consumption.
Research results have shown that irrigation control during subsurface irrigation can be easily automated and that the need for irrigators is practically eliminated.
In subsurface irrigation plots with row spacings of 90 and 60 cm, the yield of raw cotton reached 32-43 c/ha, which is approximately 15-20% more than in production teams with furrow irrigation. With thickened sowing with row spacing of 30 cm on the Voroshilov state farm with subsoil irrigation, 56.3 c/ha of raw cotton was obtained, which was almost twice the average yield on the state farm.
The consumption of irrigation water with this method of irrigation is approximately 1.3-1.5 times less than with well-organized furrow irrigation. Under normal economic conditions, water consumption is reduced by almost half.
According to Sredazirsovkhozstroy, the construction cost of subsurface irrigation systems is currently about 5 thousand rubles/ha, but it can be reduced to 3.0-3.5 thousand rubles/ha. Capital investments in the construction of systems, due to increased labor productivity, increased cotton yields and savings in irrigation water, pay for themselves in 3-4 years.
Irrigation of cotton depends on soil tillage, plant density and fertilizer. The efficiency of cotton plants' use of irrigation water is closely related to the conditions of mineral nutrition, plant density and plant placement patterns, and soil cultivation technology. An important condition for high-quality irrigation and productive use of water is timely loosening of the soil (cultivation) between rows, which improves soil permeability and reduces moisture loss due to evaporation. With an increase in the density of cotton plants and the amount of fertilizer applied, irrigation rates increase by 10-20%.

An important factor in the normal growth and development of cotton is its timely and sufficient supply of water. Her role is great and varied. It is necessary throughout the life of the plant, from seed germination to ripening, for the normal implementation of all the most important life processes (biochemical and physiological).
Cotton plants at different stages of ontogenesis react differently to a lack of water in the soil. Plants suffer especially severely from moisture deficiency during the period of differentiation of stem buds and the formation of generative organs - in the budding phase. Lack of water during this period most often causes irreversible metabolic disorders in plant cells, leading to a decrease in the yield of raw cotton and its quality. The maximum amount of water consumption in cotton plants is observed at the height of flowering and fruit formation. Water deficiency during this period causes a sharp drop in the formed fruit elements. In this case, by irrigation it is necessary to achieve a predominance of development processes in cotton over vegetative growth in order to preserve as much of the fruiting organs as possible on the lower and middle tiers. Cotton reacts to a lesser extent to lack of water during the period of mass ripening of the crop.
The degree of availability of moisture in the soil for cotton and its resistance to water deficiency depend on the age, physiological state and genotype (hereditary basis) of the plants. Among the studied forms, the most sensitive to a lack of water in the soil were the mid-ripening varieties S-4727 and AN-Chimbayabad, and the most resistant were wild cotton ssp. mexicanum and its mid-season mutant AN-401. There is also a difference between fine-fiber and medium-fiber varieties in their response to reduced water supply - the former is more drought-resistant than the latter.
Cotton plants need water to protect them from overheating. When it evaporates from the leaves, the temperature of the plant decreases, which is important for preserving its vital activity during high heating of the air by the sun. This same evaporation of water creates a more favorable microclimate in the ground layer of air.
The total water consumption of a cotton field to create a crop consists of water consumption by plants and its consumption for evaporation from the soil. If the total water consumption by the field is taken as 100%, then the share of consumption by plants (transpiration) accounts for 60-80%, and evaporation from the soil - 20-40%. The more cultivated the soil and the better the agricultural technology, the less water will be lost through evaporation, the greater the beneficial use of it by plants.
During the growing season, the average daily water consumption of a cotton field varies. At the beginning of the growing season it is small, then it constantly increases and usually reaches its greatest value during the period of the beginning and mass fruiting of cotton. In the subsequent period, the amount of water consumption is significantly reduced. Thus, for typical gray soils with deep groundwater and a raw cotton yield of 30-35 c/ha, the average daily water consumption of a cotton field was: during plant budding 18-20 m3/ha, mass flowering 50-55, mass fruit formation 85-90 , at the beginning of ripening there are 45-50 bolls, with their mass ripening 25-30 m3/ha.
The same pattern in the change in the amount of water consumption at a different absolute water consumption is noted for other soil-climatic and reclamation conditions (Fig. 39).


The total amount of water consumed by a cotton field during the entire growing season (for transpiration and evaporation from the soil) in different conditions also not the same. It depends on the climatic characteristics of the area, the properties of the soil, the level of its fertility, the depth and degree of salinity of groundwater and a number of other conditions.
Climatic indicators of cotton-growing areas may vary in air temperature, degree of dryness, amount of precipitation, and wind intensity. Depending on these conditions, the amount of atmospheric precipitation water entering the soil, the water consumption for evaporation from the soil and for transpiration by plants, and, consequently, the number of irrigations and irrigation standards.
According to climatic conditions, the irrigated territories of Central Asia are divided into three climatic zones: northern, central and southern.
The northern zone includes, for example, many regions of the Karakalpak Autonomous Republic, most of the cotton-growing regions of the Chimkent region of Kazakhstan, the Osh region of Kyrgyzstan, etc.; to the central zone - areas of Tashkent, Syrdarya regions, Fergana Valley (with the exception of foothill areas); to the south - the regions of Bukhara, Surkhandarya, Kashkadarya regions (without the foothill territory), etc.
In the northern cotton-growing regions, where the climate is cooler, the water requirement of cotton is much less than in the central and especially southern zones.
The nature of the soil and its water-physical properties are of great importance. Thus, on thin soils with close occurrence of pebbles or sand (from a depth of 30-50 cm), cotton requires frequent watering, but at low rates. This is due to the high water permeability and low water-holding capacity of these soils.
On soils with deep pebbles or sand, water consumption by cotton plants is less, but also uneven. It depends on the mechanical composition of the soil and its moisture capacity. The fewer sandy particles in the soil and the more dusty and silty particles and, therefore, the lower its water permeability and greater moisture capacity, the less irrigation is given, at higher rates.
Water consumption by cotton also depends on the degree of cultivation and the level of soil fertility. The higher it is, the greater the yield and the greater the total water consumption for growing the crop. However, the relative costs of water to create a unit of production (for example, per 1 quintal of raw cotton) are always lower compared to less fertile soils.
Groundwater at a high level replenishes the soil with moisture and, therefore, is used by plants. The share of groundwater in the total water consumption of a cotton field depends mainly on the depth of its occurrence, as well as the water-lifting capacity of the soil. If groundwater lies at a depth of 1 m or more, this proportion ranges from 0 to 10%; 2-3 m - 10-30; 1-2 m - 30-50; 0.5-1.0 m - 50-75%.
Thus, with an increase in the level of groundwater, the share of costs for irrigating cotton with surface water decreases. For example, when they are located at a depth of 1-2 m, it is 50-70%, at a depth of 0.5-1.0 m - 25-50% of the total water consumption of a cotton field.
Irrigation of cotton is also influenced to a certain extent by the degree of soil susceptibility to salinization. On soils where plants already at a young age begin to suffer from salts accumulating in the soil, irrigation must begin earlier and more water must be consumed per season than on uninfested soils at the same depth of groundwater. However, the effect of drainage of irrigated areas should be enhanced.
When determining the regime and amount of irrigation for cotton, one should also take into account the degree of planning of the fields, the level of agricultural technology used, the amount of pre-sowing soil moisture, methods of vegetation irrigation, as well as irrigation source mode and the degree of water availability of irrigated lands. The better the surface of the fields is leveled and the higher the agricultural technology, the less water is consumed for evaporation from the soil, the higher the cotton yield can be grown with less water consumption. The more water is contained in the soil before sowing (as a result of precipitation, reserve, leaching or pre-sowing irrigation), the later vegetation irrigation can begin, and the lower the irrigation norms for cotton will be.
The regime and amount of irrigation for cotton must also be consistent with the biological characteristics of cotton varieties and agricultural conditions.
Experiments show that with increasing cotton plant density, when the amount of dry mass and leaf surface per unit area increases, the total water consumption of the cotton field increases, which should be taken into account when assigning irrigation rates. Differences in irrigation also depend on the width of cotton rows.
  • Specialty of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation06.01.02
  • Number of pages 196

I. MODERN IRRIGATION TECHNOLOGIES

WASTEWATER FROM AGRICULTURAL CROPS

1.1. The principle of environmental validity of the use of wastewater in irrigated agriculture.

1.2. Experience in using wastewater for irrigation of agricultural crops.

1.3. Assessment of the possibility of growing cotton when irrigated with wastewater under conditions

Volgograd region.

II. CONDITIONS AND METHODS OF RESEARCH

2.1. Climatic conditions of the cotton growing area.

2.2. Characteristics of water-physical and agrochemical properties of soils in the experimental plot.

2.3. Scheme of experiment and research methodology. 50 2.4 Agricultural technology for cultivating cotton on light chestnut solonetzic soils.

III. ECOLOGICAL-IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT OF WASTEWATER COMPOSITION

3.1. Irrigation assessment of wastewater suitability for agricultural use.

3.2. Chemical composition of wastewater used for irrigation of cotton.

IV. IRRIGATION REGIME AND WATER CONSUMPTION

COTTON

4.1. Cotton irrigation regime.

4.1.1 Watering and irrigation standards, irrigation timing depending on the irrigation regime.

4.1.2 Dynamics of soil moisture.

4.2 Total water consumption and water balance of the cotton field. 96 V. INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION REGIME ON COTTON DEVELOPMENT AND SOIL RECLAMATION PROPERTIES

5.1. Dependence of the development of cotton crops on the conditions of the irrigation regime.

5.2. Productivity and technological qualities of cotton fiber.

5.3. The influence of wastewater irrigation on soil composition indicators.

VI. ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF COTTON IRRIGATION WITH WASTEWATER ACCORDING TO THE RECOMMENDED CULTIVATION TECHNOLOGY

Recommended list of dissertations

  • Irrigation regime for new varieties of fine-fiber cotton in the conditions of the Murghab oasis 1983, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Orazgeldyev, Hummi

  • Optimization of the water regime of fine-fiber cotton varieties on takyr and takyr-meadow soils of the Surkhan-Sherabad valley 1984, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Avliyakulov, Nurali Erankulovich

  • Studying the possibility and development of agromeliorative methods for cultivating cotton under irrigation in the semi-desert zone of the Saratov Trans-Volga region 2001, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Lamekin, Igor Vladimirovich

  • Regulating the irrigation regime for cotton in the Hungry Steppe 2005, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences Bezborodov, Alexander Germanovich

  • Effect of one-time flood irrigation and grading on soil properties and crop yields in the Tuban Delta (NDRY) 1985, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Fadel, Ahmed Ali Saleh

Introduction of the dissertation (part of the abstract) on the topic “Irrigation regime and technology for cultivating cotton when irrigated with wastewater in the conditions of the Lower Volga region”

When Central Asian cotton overnight became an imported product for textile enterprises in Central Russia, its price rose sharply. Purchasing prices for raw cotton amounted to about 2 dollars per kg, index A in 2000/01 is estimated at an average of 66 c. for a. f. (world cotton prices). This led to a reduction and complete stoppage of textile production. The main consumer of cotton fiber in Russia is the textile industry - producers of cotton and paper yarn and fabrics. The trend in the production of cotton yarn, as well as fabrics, in recent years is associated with the import of cotton fiber, which, in turn, depends a lot on the seasonality of its collection and processing.

The provision of industry with its own cotton fiber and the presence of a domestic cotton raw material base will largely have a beneficial effect on the economic potential of the country. This will significantly reduce economic and social tensions, preserve and create additional jobs in agriculture, the textile industry, etc.

World cotton production 1999 - 2001 estimated at 19.1 million tons, in 2002 - 2004. - 18.7 million tons with a significant decline in cotton fiber production. The leading place in the production of cotton fiber in Central Asia belongs to Uzbekistan (71.4%). Turkmenistan accounts for 14.6%, Tajikistan - 8.4%, Kazakhstan - 3.7%, Kyrgyzstan -1.9%. (4)

Ten years ago, more than a million tons of cotton fiber were processed in Russia, in 1997 - 132.47 thousand tons, in 1998 - 170 thousand tons. Last year, the volume of cotton fiber processing had an annual increase of about 30% - 225 thousand tons.

The change in economic relations with the collapse of the state was the result of Russia's 100% dependence on the import of cotton fiber, the maximum demand for which is 500 thousand tons.

The first attempts to grow cotton in Russia were made 270 years ago. The Department of Agriculture of Russia has covered about 300 geographical locations with experimental cotton crops. However, cotton crops have not become widespread in Russia.

At the same time, cotton fiber is a valuable strategic raw material. Cotton plant of the mallow family (Malvaceal) consists of raw cotton (fiber with seeds) - 33%, leaves - 22%, stems (guzapaya) - 24%, boll valves - 12% and roots - 9%. The seeds serve as a source of oil, flour, and high-value protein. (89, 126, 136). Cotton wool (cotton hairs) consists of more than 95% cellulose. The root bark contains vitamins K and C, trimethylamine and tannins. A liquid extract with a hemostatic effect is produced from the bark of cotton roots.

Waste from the cotton ginning industry is used in the production of alcohol, varnishes, insulating materials, linoleum, etc.; Acetic, citric and other organic acids are obtained from the leaves (the content of citric and malic acid in the leaves is 5-7% and 3-4%, respectively). (28.139).

When processing 1 ton of raw cotton, approximately 350 kg of cotton fiber, 10 kg of cotton fluff, 10 kg of fibrous fiber and about 620 kg of seeds are obtained.

At the present stage there is not a single industry National economy wherever cotton products or materials are used. The association “white gold” rightly arises when mentioning cotton, since raw cotton and its vegetative organs contain many useful substances, vitamins, amino acids, etc. (Khusanov R.).

Growing crops in the conditions of the Lower Volga region with prevailing evaporation without irrigation is impossible. The revival of non-irrigated cotton is impractical, since the products (yield of 3-4 c/ha) are not competitive in terms of economic indicators. Properly organized and planned irrigation ensures the full development of agricultural crops with a proper increase in land fertility and, as a result, an increase in productivity and quality of products. Industrial wastewater is of interest for irrigation. The use of wastewater as irrigation water is considered from two main positions: resource-saving and water-protective.

The use of wastewater for irrigation of cotton will significantly reduce the cost of the resulting raw cotton while simultaneously increasing the yield and improving the water-physical properties of the soils of the experimental site.

Cotton plant has high inexhaustible adaptive qualities. During the period of its cultivation, it moved far to the north from its areas of origin. There is every reason to assume the cultivation of some varieties in the latitude of the southern regions of Russia, right up to the eastern and southern regions of the Volgograd region.

In this regard, the target orientation of our research in 1999-2001. Along with proof of the feasibility of using wastewater for irrigation of cotton, a number of modern varieties and hybrids were tested, with the identification of the optimal irrigation regime in relation to the conditions of the Volgograd region.

The above provisions determined the direction of our research work with a consistent solution of the main tasks:

1) develop an optimal irrigation regime for medium-fiber cotton varieties when irrigated with wastewater;

2) study the influence of the irrigation regime and this method of irrigation on the growth, development and productivity of cotton;

3) study the water balance of the cotton field;

4) carry out an environmental and irrigation assessment of wastewater used for irrigation;

5) determine the timing of the onset and phase duration of cotton development depending on the weather conditions of the growing region;

6) explore the possibility of obtaining maximum yield and quality characteristics fibers of cotton varieties when irrigated with wastewater;

7) study the effectiveness of using agrotechnical techniques that reduce the time of crop maturation;

8) determine the economic and energy efficiency of irrigating cotton with wastewater.

Scientific novelty of the work: for the first time, for the conditions of light chestnut solonetzic soils of the Volgograd Trans-Volga region, the possibility of cultivating various varieties of cotton was studied using modern resource-saving principles of the functioning of irrigation systems.

The dependence of the development of cotton crops on various irrigation regimes and the possibility of adaptation to external conditions during the growing season have been studied. The influence of wastewater irrigation regimes on the water-physical properties of soils and the quality of cotton fiber has been established. Irrigation rates acceptable in these conditions for sprinkling irrigation and irrigation dates with distribution according to the phase development of the crop were determined.

Practical value: Based on field experiments, an optimal irrigation regime for various varieties of cotton using a DKN-80 machine for recycling water resources in the conditions of the Lower Volga region was recommended and developed. The natural soil and climatic conditions of the research area, in combination with a number of agrotechnical techniques, make it possible to provide additional heating of the soil, shift the sowing dates, and also eliminate the need to purchase defoliants.

Similar dissertations in the specialty “Amelioration, reclamation and land protection”, 06.01.02 code HAC

  • The influence of standing density and varietal characteristics on cotton productivity in the irrigated conditions of the arid zone of the Northern Caspian Sea 2005, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Tuz, Ruslan Konstantinovich

  • Water consumption and technology for irrigating cotton in furrows on gray-meadow soils of the Golodnaya Steppe 1994, candidate of agricultural sciences Bezborodov, Alexander Germanovich

  • Regime of irrigation and fertilization of tomatoes to obtain the planned yields with sprinkling on light chestnut soils of the Volga-Don interfluve 2009, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Fomenko, Yulia Petrovna

  • Irrigation regime and water consumption of cotton on light gray soils of Northern Tajikistan 2010, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Akhmedov, Gaibullo Saifulloevich

  • Irrigation technology for cotton under intensive cultivation methods in Tajikistan 2005, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences Rakhmatilloev, Rakhmonkul

Conclusion of the dissertation on the topic “Amelioration, reclamation and land protection”, Narbekova, Galina Rastemovna

CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESEARCH RESULTS

Analysis of the data obtained allows us to draw the following conclusions:

1. Thermal resources of the Volgograd region are sufficient for growing early ripening varieties of cotton with a growing season of 125-128 days. The sum of effective temperatures during the growing season averaged 1529.8 °C. Favorable conditions for sowing in the region develop at the end of April - the second ten days of May.

2. In the conditions of the Lower Volga region, there is an increase in the duration of cotton development in the period before flowering for all varieties up to 67 - 69 days and the onset of full ripening in the 1st - 2nd decades of October. Mulching the soil area and subsequent caulking in order to stop the growth of the main stem contributed to a reduction in the ripening time of the crop.

3. Classification of the suitability of wastewater according to irrigation indicators revealed the most favorable from an environmental point of view, safe category of wastewater for irrigation of cotton - conditionally pure.

4. The most productive variety is Fergana - 3. Maximum yield in 1999 it was obtained in the amount of 1.85 t/ha, with an average yield in the period 1999 - 2001. at the level of 1.73 t/ha. The yield of a mixture of varieties with a “0” type of branching is represented by the maximum - a possible indicator of 1.78 t/ha and an average experimental value of 1.68 t/ha.

5. All varieties under consideration are more responsive to the irrigation regime with wastewater - 70-70-60% HB in the layer according to development phases: 0.5 m - before flowering, 0.7 m during flowering - fruit formation and 0.5 m at ripening. Cultivation of plants under more moderate irrigation regimes of 60-70-60% NV and 60-60-60% NV resulted in a decrease in the productivity of varieties to 12.3 - 21%, a decrease in the number of bolls to 3 - 8.5% and a change in the mass of productive organs by 15 - 18.5%.

6. The beginning of all growing season irrigations is the first ten days of June - the beginning of the third ten days of June, the irrigation period is recommended to end in the first - third ten days of August. Inter-irrigation periods are 9-19 days. Vegetative irrigation takes up 67.3-72.2% of total water consumption, precipitation accounts for 20.9-24.7%. For normal growth and development of the Fergana - 3 variety, at least 5 irrigations are recommended, with an irrigation rate of no more than 4100 m3/ha. The first irrigation option is characterized by a water consumption coefficient of 2936 - 3132 m3/t, II - 2847 - 2855 m3/t, III - 2773 - 2859 m3/t and IV - 2973 - 2983 m3/t. Average daily water consumption varies according to the phases of cotton development, respectively 29.3 - 53 - 75 - 20.1 m3/ha.

7. The studied varieties formed, depending on irrigation regimes over the years of research, from 4 to 6.2 bolls, 18.9 - 29 leaves, 0.4 - 1.5 monopodial and from 6.3 to 8.6 fruit branches per plant. The minimum number of monopodia was formed in the more favorable years of crop growth, 1999 and 2001, 0.4 - 0.9 pcs./plant.

8. The maximum leaf area of ​​the varieties was recorded in the flowering phase for all experimental options: 15513 - 19097 m2/ha. When transitioning from abundant irrigation regimes to more stringent ones, the difference is during budding - 28 - 30%, during flowering - 16.6 - 17%, during fruit formation - 15.4 - 18.9%, during ripening - 15.8 - 19.4%.

9. In dry years, the processes of dry matter accumulation were more intense: at the time of budding, the dry mass is 0.5 t/ha, at flowering - 2.65 t/ha, at fruit formation - 4.88 t/ha and at ripening - 7 .6 t/ha on average for varieties under an abundant irrigation regime. In wetter years, there is a decrease in it at the time of ripening to 5.8 - 6 t/ha and 7.1 - 7.4 t/ha. In options with fewer waterings, a phase-by-phase decrease is observed: by 24 - 32% by the time of flowering, by 35% by the end of the growing season.

10. At the beginning of cotton development, the net productivity of photosynthesis L of leaves is in the range of 5.3 - 5.8 g/m per day, reaching a maximum value at the beginning of flowering 9.1 - 10 g/m per day. Intervariant differences in varieties (between abundant and restrained) when irrigated with wastewater amounted to 9.4 - 15.5% in the budding phase, and 7 - 25.7% in the flowering - fruit formation phase on average over the years of experience. During the ripening phase, the net productivity of photosynthesis decreases to the limiting values ​​of 1.9 - 3.1 l g/m per day.

11. Irrigation with wastewater contributes to the formation better conditions and nutritional regime of variety samples. The increase in the position of the height point is 4.4 - 5.5 cm. Differences in the biometric indicators of the options under consideration were observed in 1999 - 2001. by 7.7% in the number of true leaves, by 5% in the number of bolls and by 4% of fruit branches on average for varieties. When the quality of irrigation water changed, the increase in leaf area was reflected in the amount of 12% already in the budding - flowering phase. By the time of ripening, the excess over the control variant was expressed by 12.3% in the accumulation of dry biomass. Photosynthetic capacity in the first period of cotton development increased by 0.3 g/m, in the second - by 1.4 g/m, in the third (flowering - fruit formation) by 0.2 g/m and in ripening 0.3 l g/m . The increase in raw cotton yield amounted to an average of 1.23 c/ha."

12.V initial period cultural development, the consumption of nutrients for the Fergana - 3 variety is 24.3 - 27.4 kg/ha for nitrogen, 6.2 - 6.7 kg/ha for phosphorus and 19.3 - 20.8 kg/ha. At the end of the growing season, as a result of SW irrigation, there is an increase in removal to 125.5 - 138.3 kg/ha of nitrogen, 36.5 - 41.6 kg/ha of phosphorus and 98.9 - 112.5 kg/ha of potassium.

13. Cotton fiber of the Fergana - 3 variety obtained during the experiments was distinguished by the best technological properties. The linear density of the fiber was obtained at 141 mtex, strength 3.8 g/s, short fibers 9.5% and the highest maturity coefficient 1.8.

14. During three years of irrigation with wastewater during continuous cultivation of the crop, there is a tendency towards desalinization of the soils of the experimental plot.

15. Analysis of the system of indicators indicates that the Fergana-3 variety is the most effective for the farm. According to this option, the highest value of gross production per 1 hectare of crops was obtained (RUB 7,886), which significantly exceeds the values ​​​​obtained from a mixture of varieties.

16. In the conditions of the Volgograd Trans-Volga region, in a differentiated irrigation regime while ensuring maximum yield (1.71 t/ha) of medium-fiber cotton varieties, energy efficiency was obtained at level 2.

1. In the conditions of the Lower Volga region, it is possible to cultivate medium-fiber cotton varieties with a growing season of no more than 125 - 128 days, while obtaining a yield of 1.73 - 1.85 t/ha. Agricultural technology for growing this technical crop should involve the use of intensive technologies in the initial period of development.

2. The maximum yield of raw cotton is achieved by using a differentiated irrigation regime with maintaining soil moisture during the growing season: before flowering - 70% NV, during flowering - fruit formation - 70% NV and during the ripening period - 60% NV. It should be used as a mineral fertilizer on light chestnut solonetzic soils. ammonium nitrate in the amount of 100 kg a.v.

3. To irrigate early-ripening varieties of cotton, in order to increase plant productivity and improve the microclimate of the cotton field, it is necessary to use conditionally pure wastewater in an amount of no more than 4000 m3/ha.

List of references for dissertation research Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Narbekova, Galina Rastemovna, 2004

1. Abaldov A.N. Agroclimatic justification for cotton culture in the Stavropol region // Problems of the revival of modern Russian cotton growing. Budtsenovsk, 2000. - P. 51 - 55

2. Abaldov A.N. Cotton in the Stavropol region // Agriculture. 2001. - No. 1 - P. 21

3. Abdullaev R.V. Behavior of cotton varieties in wide-row crops // Cotton growing. 1966. - No. 6. - P. 42

4. Abdullaev R.V. Production and export of cotton fiber in the countries of Central Asia // Agrarian Science 2001. - No. 3 - P. 6 - 8

5. Abdullaev A.A., Nurmatov R.N. New and promising varieties of cotton. Tashkent: Mekhnat, 1989. - 77 p.

6. Avtonomov A.I., Kaziev M.Z., Shleikher A.I. and etc. Cotton growing. - M.: Kolos, 1983.-334 p.

7. Avtonomov A.I., Kaznev M.Z., Shleikher A.I. Cotton growing // 2nd ed. revised and expanded. M.: Kolos, 1983. - 334 p.

8. Avtonomov V.A. Irrigation regime for cotton in crop rotation on # salinity-prone lands of the Hungry Steppe.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sciences.1. Tashkent, 1991.- 175 p.

9. Agammedov Sh.T. Cultivation of cotton in the Shirvan steppe with rational use of water resources // Rational use of water and land resources in the Azerbaijan SSR. 1990. - pp. 11 - 19

10. Yu. Agroenergy assessment of crop cultivation technology // Met. decree. VGSHA. Volgograd, 2000. -32 p.

11. Agricultural technology of new zoned varieties of cotton / Ed. Ibragimov Sh.I. Tashkent, 1983. - 102 s.h.

12. Agricultural technology for irrigation of cotton // Proceedings of SoyuzNIHI. 1990. - Issue. 67.9 pp. 35 -39

13. Agricultural instructions for the cultivation of non-irrigated and irrigated cotton on collective farms Rostov region. Rostov-on-Don, 1953. - 72 p.

14. Akchurina N.A. Productivity of promising cotton varieties // Review, information. Tashkent: UZNIINTI, 1982. - 54 p.

15. Aliev K.E. Machine for modern irrigation of cotton by furrows and sprinkling (BDM - 200).: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. tech. Sci. - Ashgabat, 1965. 34 p.

16. Aliev Yu.N. Experience with wide-row sowing of cotton //

17. Cotton growing. 1967. - No. 4. - P.48

18. Alikulov R.Yu. Features of water exchange and drought resistance of some varieties of cotton under water deficiency in the soil: Abstract of thesis. diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Tashkent, 1992. - 21 p.

19. Aronov E.L. Russian cotton growing//Technique and equipment for rural areas - 2001. No. 4 - P. 16

20. Arutyunova L.G., Ibragimov Sh.I., Avtonomov A.L. Biology of cotton. M.: Kolos, 1970. - 79 pp. 20. Afanasyeva T.V., Vasilenko V.I. Soils of the USSR. M.: Mysl, 1979. - 380 p.

21. Akhmedov S.E. Reaction of cotton varieties to planting density under conditions Astrakhan region: Diss. Ph.D. Agricultural Sciences. Moscow, 1999. -175 p.

22. Babushkin L.N. Agroclimatic descriptions of Central Asia // Scientific. tr./ Tashkent State University, 1964. Issue. 236. - From 5 - 180

23. Barakaev M. Cotton irrigation regime and hydromodular zoning of the irrigated territory of the Samarkand region: Diss. doc. agricultural Sci. Samarkand, 1981. - 353 p.

24. Begliev N. Increasing the yield of raw cotton, improving the technological properties of the fiber and sowing qualities of cotton seeds depending on nutritional conditions.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Tashkent, 1985.- 151 p.

25. Bezborodoe A.G. Theoretical justification for irrigating cotton in furrows // Proceedings of SoyuzNIHI. 1990. - Issue. 67. - pp. 52 - 62

26. Bezborodov A.G. Dynamics of soil nutrients with water-saving technology for irrigation of cotton // Abstracts of reports of the scientific and technical conference of the Moscow State Medical Institute. - Moscow, 1991. - P. 3

27. Bezborodov Yu.G., Bezdorodov Yu.G. The structure of soil air in a cotton field and cotton yield // Agrarian Science, 2002. No. 8-P. 14-15

28. Belousov M.A. Patterns of growth and development of cotton. -Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1965. 32 p.

29. Bespalov N.F. Syrdarya region // Irrigation regimes and hydromodular zoning in the Uzbek SSR. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1971.-P.48-100

30. Bespalov S.N. Methods and regime of irrigation of various varieties of cotton in the conditions of the Chirchik - Angren Valley.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1985. - 185 p.

31. Bogatyrev S.M. Environmental assessment of the effectiveness of using sewage sludge as fertilizer in the conditions of the Kursk region: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Kursk, 1999. - From 5 - 59.

32. Budanov M.F. On the suitability of waters containing phenols for irrigation of agricultural crops. -M.: Kolos, 1965. 11 p.

33. Bylina M. Fundamentals of agricultural production technology // Agriculture and crop production. 2000

34. Vavilov P.P. Plant growing. M.: Agropromizdat, 1986. - P. 438

35. Vakulin A.A., Abramov B.A. et al. Irrigation and watering with wastewater//

36. Housing and communal services of the BSSR. Minsk, 1984. - Issue 4.1. pp. 25-30.

37. Walker W., Stringham G. Furrow irrigation uniformity and efficiency. Irrigation As., 1983, p. 231 -237

38. Wang X., Whister F.D. Analysis of the effects of weather factors on predictor cotton growth and yield. Bull. Mississippi agr. and forestry station10. 14 Mississippi State, 1994

39. Vaitenok F.V. Improving selection and seed production of cotton. - Tashkent, 1980. 20 P.

40. Waste Irrigation in Developing Contries. World Bank Technical Paper

41. Number 51/ The World Bank Washington, D.C. USA. 1986. - 325.

42. William V.P. Irrigation fields // Collected works 1.2 M.: Selkhozgiz, 1950.-T2-452 p.

43. Cotton plantations are being revived // Financial news / Agricultural Economics of Russia. 1998. - No. 7 - P. 33

44. Issues of genetics, selection and seed production of cotton / Ed. Egamberdiev A.E. Tashkent: VNIISSKH, 1991.- 114 p.

45. Vorobyova R.P. Use of wastewater for irrigation in the Altai Territory / Integrated use of water resources and water protection. // MiVH. 2001. - No. 4 - P. 30 - 34.

46. ​​Voronin N.G., Bocharov V.P. Use of wastewater for irrigation of agricultural crops in the Volga region.-M.: Rosagroproizdat, 1988. - P. 25-33

47. Gavrilov A.M. Scientific basis for the conservation and reproduction of soil fertility in agricultural landscapes of the Lower Volga region. Volgograd, 1997.-182 p.

48. Ganzhara N.F. Soil science. - M.: Agroconsult, 2001. 392 p.

49. Genetics, selection and seed production of cotton / Ed. Mirakhmedova S.M. Tashkent, 1987. - 178 p.

50. Gildiev S.A., Nabizhodzhaev S.S. The influence of various irrigation rates on the growth, development and productivity of cotton // Proceedings of the Union of Scientific Research Institutes, 1964. Vol. 2

51. Ginzburg K.E. Phosphorus of the main soil types of the USSR. M.: Nauka, 1981. -181 p.

52. Gorenberg Y.H. Irrigation regimes for cotton depending on standing density // Cotton Growing. - 1960. No. 4 - P. 45 - 48

53. Gorbunov N.I., Bekarevich N.E. Soil crust during cotton irrigation. M.: Publishing house. Academician Sciences of the USSR, 1955. - 45 p.

54. Gostishchev D.P., Kastrikina N.I. Use of wastewater for irrigation of agricultural crops/ STO of agriculture. -M.: Rosselkhozizdat, 1982.-48 p.

55. Grammaticati O.G. Conditions of use for irrigation of water of high mineralization // Improving the quality of irrigation water // Sat. scientific works of VASKHNIL/Agropromizdat. M. - 1990. - P. 64.

56. Grigorenkova E.N. Ecological and biological foundations and prospects for cotton cultivation in the Astrakhan region // Final scientific conference of the ASPU: Abstracts. report Botany / ASPU - Astrakhan, 1998. - P. 5

57. Grigorov M.S., Ovchinnikov A.S., Semenenko S.Ya. Subsurface irrigation with wastewater: Lectures of the All-Russian Agricultural Institute. Volgograd, 1989. - P. 52

58. Grigorov M.S., Akhmedov A.D. The influence of subsurface irrigation on the water-physical properties of soil and the productivity of forage crops // Sat. scientific tr. Water-saving technologies for agricultural crops. - Volgograd, 2001. - P. 5

59. Grigorov M.S., Ovchinnikov A.S. Methods of irrigation with wastewater and ecology // Collection of scientific works. works of NIISSV Progress. Moscow. - 1998. - P. 256 -261

60. Guliev D.T., Alimbekov M.U. The influence of water regime on the growth, development and yield of cotton // Sat. scientific tr. SAOVASNIL. 1978. - Issue. 4. - pp. 13-14

61. Gyulakhmedov X. Optimal conditions // Cotton. 1991. - No. 1. - P. 42 -43

62. Dale J. E. Investigations into the stomatology of upland cotton. Annals of Botany., 1961, v. 25 No. 97 p.39 - 52

63. Armor B.A. Field experiment methodology. M.: Agproizdat, 1985. - 351 p.

64. Duisenov T.K. Irrigation regime and cotton plant density under different irrigation methods on Newly irrigated serozem meadow soils

65. Hungry Steppe: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1988. - P 4 - 128

66. Duisenov T.K. The influence of the method and technology of furrow irrigation on cotton yield // Technology of cultivation of new promising medium and fine-fiber varieties of cotton in Uzbekistan. Tashkent, 1991. - P. 24 - 27

67. Enileev Kh.Kh. Ways to increase the cold resistance and early ripening of cotton // Cotton growing 1963. - No. 12 - P. 19-22f 65. Eremenko V.E. On the lower limit of soil moisture before watering cotton // Cotton Growing 1959. - No. 12 - P. 53 - 58

68. Zhumamuratov A., Khatamov Sh., Ramanova T. et al. Distribution of chemical elements in soils of cotton-growing zones // Agriculture. 2003. - Issue. 1.-S. 13

69. Zakirova S.Kh. Irrigation regime for various varieties of cotton on skeletal deflated light gray soils of the Fergana Valley.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1986. - 190 p.

70. Use of wastewater for land irrigation / ed. Ph.D. those. Sciences Novikova V.M. M.: Kolos, 1983. - 167 p.

71. Isashov A., Khozhimatov A., Khakimov A. Problems of reconstruction and practice of calculating the irrigation regime for cotton in Uzbekistan // Melioration and water management 2001. - No. 2 - P. 12-13

72. Ismatullaev Z.Yu. Cotton plant in the zone of wind soil erosion // Agrarian Science, 2002. No. 7 - P. 14 - 15

73. Kaminsky V.S., Safronova K.I. Protection of surface waters in the USSR and assessment of their condition // Water Resources. Moscow. - 1987. - P. 38 - 40

75. Karnaukhova V.V. Meteorological conditions and cotton productivity / In the book. Issues of meteorology. - JL: Gidropromizdat. 1977. - Issue. 40 (121).-P. 30-36

76. Kasyanenko V.A., Artyukhina S.A. Revival of Russian cotton growing // Textile industry. 1999, - No. 2,3. - P. 18

77. Kasyanenko A.G., Semikin A.P. Results of ten years of work on selection, biological protection and agricultural technology of Russian cotton // Problems of revival of modern Russian cotton growing. - Buddenovsk, 2000. S. 25 - 42, S. 71 - 76

78. Kayumov M.K. Programming of crop yields. - M.: Rosagropromizdat, 1989. - 387 p.

79. Kelesbaev B.A. Development of a method for calculating the network of cotton crops.: Diss. Ph.D. tech. Sci. Tashkent, 1984. - 253 p.

80. Kovalenko N.Ya. Agricultural economics with the basics of agricultural markets. M.: EKMOS, 1998. - 368 p.

81. Konstantinov N.N. Morphological - physiological basis ontogenesis and phylogeny of cotton. M.: Nauka, 1967. - 219 p.

82. Kruzhilin A.S. Biological characteristics of irrigated crops. - M.: Kolos-1977.-304 p.

83. Kurbaev O.T. Water mode and productivity of fine and medium-fiber cotton varieties.: Diss. Ph.D. biol. Sci. Academy of Sciences of the UzSSR, 1975.-154 p.

84. Laktaev N.T. Irrigation of cotton M.: Kolos, 1978. - 175 p.

85. Lamekin I.V. Study of the possibility and development of agro-reclamation methods for cultivating cotton under irrigation in the semi-desert zone of the Saratov Trans-Volga region: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Saratov, 2001 - 221 p.

86. Larsen V.E. Mulching in cotton production in the USA // Cotton Growing, 1963. No. 9 - P. 53 - 54

87. Lvovich A.I. Use of wastewater for irrigation abroad // M.: VNITISKH, 1968. 207 p.

88. Markman A.L., Umarov A.U. Complex use of cotton seeds. Tashkent: State Publishing House of the UzSSR, 1963. - 55 p.

89. Marymov V.I. Neutralization and disposal of wastewater from industrial enterprises in the industrial zone in the Lower Volga region.: Diss. doc. agricultural Sci. Volgograd, 1975. - 360 p.

90. Mauney J.R. Floral initiation of upland cotton Gossyppium hirsutum L. in response to temperature J. Exp. Bot, 1966. - vol 17, - no. 52, p. 452 - 459

91. Matvienko O.F. The yield and quality of raw cotton depending on the timing of sowing, defoliation and air temperature. Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Tashkent, 1986. - 156 p.

92. Machigin B.P. Agrochemical properties of soils and the influence of fertilizers on the development of cotton // Sat. scientific Proceedings of CSCA/Union NIHI. Tashkent.- 1957.-S. 113-120.

93. Mauer F.M. To the study of the root system of cotton // Cotton Business. - 1925. No. 5 - 6 - P. 367 - 386

94. Mauer F.M. Origin and taxonomy of cotton in the book. Cotton plant: T 1.-Tashkent, 1954.-384 p.

95. Medvedev P.S., Azarkin N.A., Gaevsky K.V. Agricultural instructions for the cultivation of non-irrigated cotton on collective farms in the Stalingrad region. Stalingrad, 1952

96. Mednis M.P. Irrigation of cotton depends on the early maturity of the variety and the height of the crop. - Tashkent: Publishing house. Academician Sciences of the Uzbek SSR, 1953.

97. Methodology for determining the quality of raw cotton and its sale to the state // Tajik Agricultural Institute - Dushambe, 1985. - 14 p.

98. Methodology of field experiments with cotton under irrigation conditions // All-Russian Research Institute of Cotton Growing. T.: Ministry of Agriculture of the UzSSR, 1981. - 240 p.

99. Mirzambetov K.M. The influence of different soil moisture on some indicators of water and carbohydrate metabolism of cotton during different periods of its development.: Diss. Ph.D. biol. Sci. Tashkent, 1972. - 165 p.

100. Muminov F.A. Weather, climate and cotton. JL: Gidrometeoizdat, 1991.-190 p.

101. Muminov F.A., Abdullaev A.K. Agrometeorological assessment of moisture availability in cotton crops. JI.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1974.- 85 p.

102. Muravyov A.G., Danilova V.V. Guide to determining water quality indicators using field methods Ed. 2nd. St. Petersburg: Christmas, 2000. - P. 15

103. Muradov S.N. The influence of mass transfer processes on the use of water resources when managing the water balance of an irrigated area.: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. tech. Sci. Ashgabat, 1990. - 58 p.

104. Musaev A.I. Soil water regime during irrigation of forage crops with municipal wastewater on light gray soils in the southeast of Kazakhstan: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Dzhambul, 1985. - 219 p.

105. Mukhamedzhanov Z., Mirza Ali, Zakirov A. Temperature and development of cotton. -M.: Kolos, 1965. S. 114 - 119

106. Nazirov N.D. Cotton and fertilizer. Tashkent, 1977. - P. 34

107. Novikov V.M., Elik E.E. Use of wastewater in fields. - M.: Rosselkhozizdat, 1986. 78 p.

108. New cotton variety Kyrgyz 3. - Frunze: Ministry of Agriculture of the Kyrgyz SSR, 1985.-6 p.

109. Standards for labor costs for cotton production. - Tashkent: State Agricultural Industry of the UzSSR, 1987. 54 p.

110. Nurmatov K.N. Irrigation and a progressive method of cultivating cotton. T.: State Publishing House of the UzSSR, 1957. - 231 p.

111. Tillage and watering of cotton. Tashkent, 1990. - 120 p.

112. Ovchinnikov A.S. The influence of water and nutritional regimes on the yield of winter wheat under subsoil irrigation in the book. Improving the design of irrigation systems, 1981, pp. 51 -54

113. Ovchinnikov A.S. Technological foundations and efficiency of soil irrigation with livestock waste, the use of sapropels and sewage sludge in irrigated agriculture.: Diss. doc. agricultural Sci. Volgograd, 2000. - 555 p.

114. Ovtsov L.P., Semenov B.S. Use of industrial wastewater for irrigation of tree plantations in the Volga and Caspian regions. M.: Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation, NIISSV "Progress", 2000. - 155 p.

115. Report on the contractual topic of VNIISSV with the Gissar Valley Department of Irrigation Systems. The influence of watering disinfected water

116. BOXING ponds waste water on the development and productivity of cotton for 1972-1976 / Responsible. Spanish Nagibin Y.D., 1976

117. Report on scientific research work(according to agreement No. 11/99 dated 01.01.99 on the topic “Develop a technology for growing cotton under irrigation with dry water from the wastewater treatment facilities of OJSC Volzhsky Nitrogen-Oxygen Plant.” - Volzhsky, 1999. - 110 p.

118. Pankova E.I., Aidarov I.P. Environmental requirements for the quality of irrigation water// Soil Science. 1995. - No. 7 - P. 870 - 878

119. Pershin G.P. Efficiency of early nitrogen fertilizers on cotton: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1959.-24 p.

120. Poberezhsky JI.H. Method for calculating total evaporation during the growing season of cotton // Scientific. tr. / SANIGMI, 1975. Issue. 23. - pp. 121 -13

121. Ponomareva E., Tsai S. Formation of ridges // Cotton. - 1990. No. 5. -S. 29-30

122. Razuvaev V.S. Irrigation regime for corn and optimal parameters subsoil irrigation with wastewater from the city of Engels: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Saratov, 1980. - 142 p.

123. Reagan V. Brovn. Information on cottonseed Prootein form law - gossypol cotton. A Cooperative Effort of the Natural Fibers and Food Protein Commission and the Texas Department of Agriculture, 1980. - 13 p.

124. Rejepov M.B. Ecological regimes of irrigation of agricultural crops in the Arid zone (using the example of cotton).: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Saratov, 1997. - 21 p.

125. Irrigation regimes and field techniques scientific research/ ed. Averyanova S.F. M.: Kolos, 1971. - 196 p.

126. Results of scientific research on industrial crops 1952 -1955. edited by doc. agricultural Sciences Sinyagina I.I. M.: Min. S.-kh. USSR, 1957.- 174 p.

127. Reshetov G.G. Reclamation of newly developed soils in Uzbekistan. - T.: Mekhnat, 1986, 160 p.

128. Reshetov G.G. Calculation of irrigation norms for cotton // Hydraulics and land reclamation. 1978. - No. 4. - P. 5

129. Reshetov G.G. Methodology for qualitative and reclamation assessment of soils in the Arid Zone for irrigation purposes.// Coll. scientific Proceedings of the Institute Sredagiprovodkhlopok. Tashkent. - 1982. - S. 3 - 18.

130. Ruziev I. The importance of combined crops // Achievements of science and technology of the agro-industrial complex / Min. SHRF. Moscow. - 2001. - No. 6 - P. 28

131. Rumyantsev A. Cooperation of CMEA member countries in the field of protection of water resources from pollution // Contribution of CMEA member countries to environmental protection. Moscow, 1982. - P. 218 - 224

132. Sadykov A.S. Cotton is a miracle plant. M.: Nauka, 1985. - 146 p.

133. Sadykov S.S. Increasing the early maturity and yield of cotton. -Tashkent: FAN, 1972.-323 p.

134. Sadykov S.S. The role of temperature and light factors in the transformation of the nature of cotton // Bulletin of Agricultural Sciences, 1963.-No. 3-S. 128-131

135. Sadykov A.S., Turulov A.V. Cotton leaves are valuable chemical raw materials. - Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1967. - 109 p.

136. Sanginov B.S. Released and promising varieties of fine-fiber cotton in Tajikistan. Dushanbe: TajikNINTI, 1983. - 64 p.

137. Sanaev N.N., Gubanova N.G. Drought resistance of cotton // Agricultural science. 2002. - Issue. 6. - P. 21

138. Sattarov F.M. Irrigation regime for cotton under subsoil irrigation // Proceedings of SoyuzNIHI. 1996. - Issue. 67. - pp. 68 - 69

139. Sattarov D. Variety, soil, fertilizer and harvest. Tashkent: Mekhnat, 1998 -192 p.

140. Sattarov F.M., Mednis M.GT. Irrigation regimes for cotton during sprinkling for lands with close and spongy groundwater // Scientific. tr. Union NIHI, 1974. Vol. 27. - pp. 92 - 100

141. Sattarov F.M. irrigation regime for cotton under subsurface irrigation // Proceedings of the Union of Scientific Research Institutes, 1990. Vol. 67. - pp. 68 - 69

142. Sakhim H.F. Irrigation regime and technique of furrow irrigation of cotton on meadow soils of the Chirchik-Angren valley: Author's abstract. diss. Ph.D. tech. Sci. Moscow, 1992.-21 p.

143. Sevryugin V. Evaporation during irrigation of cotton by sprinkling. -Tashkent, 1992.-211 p.

144. Semenov V.M., Baev I.A., Terekhov S.A. Economics of enterprises. - M.: Center for Economics and Marketing, 1996.- 184 p.

145. Sergienko L.I. Wastewater from the chemical and microbiological industry, their purification and use for irrigation of various agricultural crops in the Lower Volga region: Diss. doc. agricultural Sci. Volgograd, 1987.-T 1.2

146. Sergaziev A. Features of inter-row cultivation of cotton during irrigation by sprinkling: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Alma-Ata, 1964.24 p.

147. Sergienko L.I., Semenov B.S. Techniques and methods for increasing the efficiency of using livestock waste in irrigation fields of the Volgograd region / Sat. Use of wastewater for irrigation of agricultural crops. - V, 1990. P. 99 - 103.

148. Sergienko L.I., Ovtsov L.P., Semenov B.S. Environmental aspects of using wastewater for irrigation. - Volzhsky, 1993. 187 p.

149. Smith G.W., Cothrem J.T., Varvil J. In: Agronomy J., 1986, v. 78 No. 5 p. 814#-818

151. Sokolov AL. Modeling of irrigation in cotton farming // Land reclamation and water management. 1991. - No. 3. - P. 22 - 24

152. Soliev S.Kh. Technology of cotton cultivation in extreme climatic conditions of the Beshkent Valley.: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Moscow, 1993. 23 p.

153. Directory of agrochemist / Ed. 2nd revised and expanded. - M.: Rosselkhozizdat, 1980.-285 p.

154. Reference book on chemicalization of agriculture. M.: Kolos, 1969.-S. 152-159

155. Directory / Land reclamation and water management // Irrigation, ed. acad. Shumakova B.B. M.: Kolos, 1999. - 432 p.

156. Handbook of cotton growing. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1981. - 437 p.

157. Cotton grower's directory / practical guide on the development of intensive technology for cultivating cotton in the conditions of the Karakalpak Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. Nukus., 1987. - 28 p.

158. Ter-Avanesyan D.V. Khlopchatnik-M.: Kolos, 1973.-482 p.

159. Technology for cultivating new promising medium- and fine-fiber cotton varieties in Uzbekistan // Proc. report scientific-technical conference/ NPO "SoyuzKhlopok" Tashkent, Karshi, 1991. 98 p.

160. Timchenko I.I. Use of industrial wastewater for rice irrigation in the Volgograd Trans-Volga region: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Volgograd, 1972. - 152 p.

161. Standard production standards and fuel consumption for mechanized field work in cotton growing / Standard production standards for handmade in cotton growing. M.: VO Agropromizdat, 1989. - 148 p.

162. Trapeznikov V.F. Irrigation regime for cotton with furrow irrigation and sprinkling on light gray soils of the Kopetdag Plain: Abstract of thesis. diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1989. - 24 p.

163. Trapeznikov V.F. Comparative economic indicators of cotton irrigation regimes and technologies // Development of the agro-industrial complex of the TSSR in new conditions. Ashgabat, 1991. - P. 66 - 73

164. Turaev T. Results of studying the irrigation regime of a new variety of fine-fiber cotton 6249. In the book. Irrigation of agricultural crops.: T 4. D ushambe, 1973.

165. Turaev R., Turaev A., Kurbanov E.K. Basic and repeated post-grain sowing of cotton and its water and nutritional regime in the desert zone of Uzbekistan // International Agricultural Journal, 2000. No. 6 - P. 54 - 60

166. Umarov A.A., Kutyanin L.I. New defoliants, search, properties, application. - M.: Chemistry, 2000. 141 p.

167. Faranzheva S.A., Gumbatov O.M., Guseinov R.F. Irrigation regime and cotton resistance to pests. 1999. - From 29 to 30

168. Fedodeev V.I., Ovtsov L.P., Elik E.E. Current state and prospects for the agricultural use of wastewater // Review information of the Central Scientific and Technical Institute of the USSR Ministry of Water Construction. Moscow. - 1990. - 42 p.

169. Kharchenko S.I., Volkov A.S. Fundamentals of methods for determining irrigation regimes. Obninsk: VNIIGMI MVD, 1979. - 44 p.

170. Cotton growing in Russia: history, prospects. Krasnodar, 1990. - 320 p.

171. Khodzhaev D. Water stress and crop quality // Cotton. - 1991. No. 2. -S. 49-50

172. Khusanov R. Cotton is the head of everything // Business - 1998. - No. 5,6. - From 34 - 35

173. Tsikeridze R.V. Use of industrial wastewater from Rustavi for irrigation of agricultural crops on light chestnut soils of Eastern Georgia. Diss. Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Sci. - Tbilisi, 1982.

174. Shavrokin P.I. On the toxicity of soil solution concentrations for cotton growth // Soil Science. - 1961. No. 11 - P. 44 - 50

175. Shakhmedova G.S., Asfandiyarova M.LLI. Prospects for cotton selection in the Astrakhan region // Problems of the revival of modern Russian cotton growing. Buddenovsk, 2000. - P. 43 -50

176. Shakhmedova G.S., Asfandiyarova M.Sh., Ivanenko E.M. Possibilities of cotton cultivation in the Caspian region. In the book. Agriculture and rational environmental management. - M.: MU, 1998. P 145-150

177. Shakhov A.A. Salt tolerance of plants. M.: Publishing house. Academy of Sciences of the SSR, 1956. -552 p.

178. Shevtsov N.M. Subsoil treatment and disposal of wastewater. -M.: Agropromizdat, 1964.- 141 p.

179. Sherbaev S. Irrigation regime for cotton according to the layer and turnover of the alfalfa layer when applying different rates of fertilizers.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. VNIIH/ SoyuzNIKHI, 1970. - 174 p.

180. Shleicher A.Ch. Dependence of the magnitude of cotton fertility on the nature of development of the root system. Scientific tr./ Tashkent Agricultural Institute, 1956. Issue. 7.-S. 16

181. Shumakov B.B., Bezdorodov Yu.G. Resource-saving technology for cotton cultivation // Agrarian Science, 1997. No. 5 - P. 29 - 30

182. Shuravilin A.V. The influence of irrigation technology on the water-salt regime of soils and cotton yield // Current issue. Land reforms, 1997.-P. 185-187

183. Elpiner J.I., Vasiliev B.C. Water resources, modern features and prospects for water consumption in the USA // Water Resources. 1983.-No. 1-S. 163-170.

184. Yuldashev S.Kh. Cotton yield factors. T.: FAN, 1982. -S. 168

185. Ywamura T. Biochem. et biophys. Acta, 1962, 61, p. 472

186. Yasonidi O.E. Agricultural use of waste water. - Novocherkassk, 1981. P. 67 - 70

Please note that the scientific texts presented above are posted for informational purposes only and were obtained through original dissertation text recognition (OCR). Therefore, they may contain errors associated with imperfect recognition algorithms. IN PDF files There are no such errors in the dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

I. MODERN IRRIGATION TECHNOLOGIES

WASTEWATER FROM AGRICULTURAL CROPS

1.1. The principle of environmental validity of the use of wastewater in irrigated agriculture.

1.2. Experience in using wastewater for irrigation of agricultural crops.

1.3. Assessment of the possibility of growing cotton when irrigated with wastewater under conditions

Volgograd region.

II. CONDITIONS AND METHODS OF RESEARCH

2.1. Climatic conditions of the cotton growing area.

2.2. Characteristics of water-physical and agrochemical properties of soils in the experimental plot.

2.3. Scheme of experiment and research methodology. 50 2.4 Agricultural technology for cultivating cotton on light chestnut solonetzic soils.

III. ECOLOGICAL-IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT OF WASTEWATER COMPOSITION

3.1. Irrigation assessment of wastewater suitability for agricultural use.

3.2. Chemical composition of wastewater used for irrigation of cotton.

IV. IRRIGATION REGIME AND WATER CONSUMPTION

COTTON

4.1. Cotton irrigation regime.

4.1.1 Watering and irrigation standards, irrigation timing depending on the irrigation regime.

4.1.2 Dynamics of soil moisture.

4.2 Total water consumption and water balance of the cotton field. 96 V. INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION REGIME ON COTTON DEVELOPMENT AND SOIL RECLAMATION PROPERTIES

5.1. Dependence of the development of cotton crops on the conditions of the irrigation regime.

5.2. Productivity and technological qualities of cotton fiber.

5.3. The influence of wastewater irrigation on soil composition indicators.

VI. ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF COTTON IRRIGATION WITH WASTEWATER ACCORDING TO THE RECOMMENDED CULTIVATION TECHNOLOGY

Introduction Dissertation on agriculture, on the topic "Irrigation regime and technology for cultivating cotton when irrigated with wastewater in the conditions of the Lower Volga region"

When Central Asian cotton overnight became an imported product for textile enterprises in Central Russia, its price rose sharply. Purchasing prices for raw cotton amounted to about 2 dollars per kg, index A in 2000/01 is estimated at an average of 66 c. for a. f. (world cotton prices). This led to a reduction and complete stoppage of textile production. The main consumer of cotton fiber in Russia is the textile industry - producers of cotton and paper yarn and fabrics. The trend in the production of cotton yarn, as well as fabrics, in recent years is associated with the import of cotton fiber, which, in turn, depends a lot on the seasonality of its collection and processing.

The provision of industry with its own cotton fiber and the presence of a domestic cotton raw material base will largely have a beneficial effect on the economic potential of the country. This will significantly reduce economic and social tensions, preserve and create additional jobs in agriculture, the textile industry, etc.

World cotton production 1999 - 2001 estimated at 19.1 million tons, in 2002 - 2004. - 18.7 million tons with a significant decline in cotton fiber production. The leading place in the production of cotton fiber in Central Asia belongs to Uzbekistan (71.4%). Turkmenistan accounts for 14.6%, Tajikistan - 8.4%, Kazakhstan - 3.7%, Kyrgyzstan -1.9%. (4)

Ten years ago, more than a million tons of cotton fiber were processed in Russia, in 1997 - 132.47 thousand tons, in 1998 - 170 thousand tons. Last year, the volume of cotton fiber processing had an annual increase of about 30% - 225 thousand tons.

The change in economic relations with the collapse of the state was the result of Russia's 100% dependence on the import of cotton fiber, the maximum demand for which is 500 thousand tons.

The first attempts to grow cotton in Russia were made 270 years ago. The Department of Agriculture of Russia has covered about 300 geographical locations with experimental cotton crops. However, cotton crops have not become widespread in Russia.

At the same time, cotton fiber is a valuable strategic raw material. Cotton plant of the mallow family (Malvaceal) consists of raw cotton (fiber with seeds) - 33%, leaves - 22%, stems (guzapaya) - 24%, boll valves - 12% and roots - 9%. The seeds serve as a source of oil, flour, and high-value protein. (89, 126, 136). Cotton wool (cotton hairs) consists of more than 95% cellulose. The root bark contains vitamins K and C, trimethylamine and tannins. A liquid extract with a hemostatic effect is produced from the bark of cotton roots.

Waste from the cotton ginning industry is used in the production of alcohol, varnishes, insulating materials, linoleum, etc.; Acetic, citric and other organic acids are obtained from the leaves (the content of citric and malic acid in the leaves is 5-7% and 3-4%, respectively). (28.139).

When processing 1 ton of raw cotton, approximately 350 kg of cotton fiber, 10 kg of cotton fluff, 10 kg of fibrous fiber and about 620 kg of seeds are obtained.

At the present stage, there is not a single sector of the national economy where cotton products or materials are not used. The association “white gold” rightly arises when mentioning cotton, since raw cotton and its vegetative organs contain many useful substances, vitamins, amino acids, etc. (Khusanov R.).

Growing crops in the conditions of the Lower Volga region with prevailing evaporation without irrigation is impossible. The revival of non-irrigated cotton is impractical, since the products (yield of 3-4 c/ha) are not competitive in terms of economic indicators. Properly organized and planned irrigation ensures the full development of agricultural crops with a proper increase in land fertility and, as a result, an increase in productivity and quality of products. Industrial wastewater is of interest for irrigation. The use of wastewater as irrigation water is considered from two main positions: resource-saving and water-protective.

The use of wastewater for irrigation of cotton will significantly reduce the cost of the resulting raw cotton while simultaneously increasing the yield and improving the water-physical properties of the soils of the experimental site.

Cotton plant has high inexhaustible adaptive qualities. During the period of its cultivation, it moved far to the north from its areas of origin. There is every reason to assume the cultivation of some varieties in the latitude of the southern regions of Russia, right up to the eastern and southern regions of the Volgograd region.

In this regard, the target orientation of our research in 1999-2001. Along with proof of the feasibility of using wastewater for irrigation of cotton, a number of modern varieties and hybrids were tested, with the identification of the optimal irrigation regime in relation to the conditions of the Volgograd region.

The above provisions determined the direction of our research work with a consistent solution of the main tasks:

1) develop an optimal irrigation regime for medium-fiber cotton varieties when irrigated with wastewater;

2) study the influence of the irrigation regime and this method of irrigation on the growth, development and productivity of cotton;

3) study the water balance of the cotton field;

4) carry out an environmental and irrigation assessment of wastewater used for irrigation;

5) determine the timing of the onset and phase duration of cotton development depending on the weather conditions of the growing region;

6) explore the possibility of obtaining maximum yield and quality characteristics of the fiber of cotton varieties when irrigated with wastewater;

7) study the effectiveness of using agrotechnical techniques that reduce the time of crop maturation;

8) determine the economic and energy efficiency of irrigating cotton with wastewater.

Scientific novelty of the work: for the first time, for the conditions of light chestnut solonetzic soils of the Volgograd Trans-Volga region, the possibility of cultivating various varieties of cotton was studied using modern resource-saving principles of the functioning of irrigation systems.

The dependence of the development of cotton crops on various irrigation regimes and the possibility of adaptation to external conditions during the growing season have been studied. The influence of wastewater irrigation regimes on the water-physical properties of soils and the quality of cotton fiber has been established. Irrigation rates acceptable in these conditions for sprinkling irrigation and irrigation dates with distribution according to the phase development of the crop were determined.

Practical value: Based on field experiments, an optimal irrigation regime for various varieties of cotton using a DKN-80 machine for recycling water resources in the conditions of the Lower Volga region was recommended and developed. The natural soil and climatic conditions of the research area, in combination with a number of agrotechnical techniques, make it possible to provide additional heating of the soil, shift the sowing dates, and also eliminate the need to purchase defoliants.

Conclusion Dissertation on the topic "Amelioration, reclamation and land protection", Narbekova, Galina Rastemovna

CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESEARCH RESULTS

Analysis of the data obtained allows us to draw the following conclusions:

1. Thermal resources of the Volgograd region are sufficient for growing early ripening varieties of cotton with a growing season of 125-128 days. The sum of effective temperatures during the growing season averaged 1529.8 °C. Favorable conditions for sowing in the region develop at the end of April - the second ten days of May.

2. In the conditions of the Lower Volga region, there is an increase in the duration of cotton development in the period before flowering for all varieties up to 67 - 69 days and the onset of full ripening in the 1st - 2nd decades of October. Mulching the soil area and subsequent caulking in order to stop the growth of the main stem contributed to a reduction in the ripening time of the crop.

3. Classification of the suitability of wastewater according to irrigation indicators revealed the most favorable from an environmental point of view, safe category of wastewater for irrigation of cotton - conditionally pure.

4. The most productive variety is Fergana - 3. The maximum yield in 1999 was obtained in the amount of 1.85 t/ha, with an average yield in the period 1999 - 2001. at the level of 1.73 t/ha. The yield of a mixture of varieties with a “0” type of branching is represented by the maximum - a possible indicator of 1.78 t/ha and an average experimental value of 1.68 t/ha.

5. All varieties under consideration are more responsive to the irrigation regime with wastewater - 70-70-60% HB in the layer according to development phases: 0.5 m - before flowering, 0.7 m during flowering - fruit formation and 0.5 m at ripening. Cultivation of plants under more moderate irrigation regimes of 60-70-60% NV and 60-60-60% NV resulted in a decrease in the productivity of varieties to 12.3 - 21%, a decrease in the number of bolls to 3 - 8.5% and a change in the mass of productive organs by 15 - 18.5%.

6. The beginning of all growing season irrigations is the first ten days of June - the beginning of the third ten days of June, the irrigation period is recommended to end in the first - third ten days of August. Inter-irrigation periods are 9-19 days. Vegetative irrigation takes up 67.3-72.2% of total water consumption, precipitation accounts for 20.9-24.7%. For normal growth and development of the Fergana - 3 variety, at least 5 irrigations are recommended, with an irrigation rate of no more than 4100 m3/ha. The first irrigation option is characterized by a water consumption coefficient of 2936 - 3132 m3/t, II - 2847 - 2855 m3/t, III - 2773 - 2859 m3/t and IV - 2973 - 2983 m3/t. Average daily water consumption varies according to the phases of cotton development, respectively 29.3 - 53 - 75 - 20.1 m3/ha.

7. The studied varieties formed, depending on irrigation regimes over the years of research, from 4 to 6.2 bolls, 18.9 - 29 leaves, 0.4 - 1.5 monopodial and from 6.3 to 8.6 fruit branches per plant. The minimum number of monopodia was formed in the more favorable years of crop growth, 1999 and 2001, 0.4 - 0.9 pcs./plant.

8. The maximum leaf area of ​​the varieties was recorded in the flowering phase for all experimental options: 15513 - 19097 m2/ha. When transitioning from abundant irrigation regimes to more stringent ones, the difference is during budding - 28 - 30%, during flowering - 16.6 - 17%, during fruit formation - 15.4 - 18.9%, during ripening - 15.8 - 19.4%.

9. In dry years, the processes of dry matter accumulation were more intense: at the time of budding, the dry mass is 0.5 t/ha, at flowering - 2.65 t/ha, at fruit formation - 4.88 t/ha and at ripening - 7 .6 t/ha on average for varieties under an abundant irrigation regime. In wetter years, there is a decrease in it at the time of ripening to 5.8 - 6 t/ha and 7.1 - 7.4 t/ha. In options with fewer waterings, a phase-by-phase decrease is observed: by 24 - 32% by the time of flowering, by 35% by the end of the growing season.

10. At the beginning of cotton development, the net productivity of photosynthesis L of leaves is in the range of 5.3 - 5.8 g/m per day, reaching a maximum value at the beginning of flowering 9.1 - 10 g/m per day. Intervariant differences in varieties (between abundant and restrained) when irrigated with wastewater amounted to 9.4 - 15.5% in the budding phase, and 7 - 25.7% in the flowering - fruit formation phase on average over the years of experience. During the ripening phase, the net productivity of photosynthesis decreases to the limiting values ​​of 1.9 - 3.1 l g/m per day.

11. Irrigation with wastewater contributes to the formation of better conditions and nutritional regime of variety samples. The increase in the position of the height point is 4.4 - 5.5 cm. Differences in the biometric indicators of the options under consideration were observed in 1999 - 2001. by 7.7% in the number of true leaves, by 5% in the number of bolls and by 4% of fruit branches on average for varieties. When the quality of irrigation water changed, the increase in leaf area was reflected in the amount of 12% already in the budding - flowering phase. By the time of ripening, the excess over the control variant was expressed by 12.3% in the accumulation of dry biomass. Photosynthetic capacity in the first period of cotton development increased by 0.3 g/m, in the second - by 1.4 g/m, in the third (flowering - fruit formation) by 0.2 g/m and in ripening 0.3 l g/m . The increase in raw cotton yield amounted to an average of 1.23 c/ha."

12. In the initial period of crop development, the consumption of nutrients for the Fergana - 3 variety is 24.3 - 27.4 kg/ha for nitrogen, 6.2 - 6.7 kg/ha for phosphorus and 19.3 - 20.8 kg /ha. At the end of the growing season, as a result of SW irrigation, there is an increase in removal to 125.5 - 138.3 kg/ha of nitrogen, 36.5 - 41.6 kg/ha of phosphorus and 98.9 - 112.5 kg/ha of potassium.

13. Cotton fiber of the Fergana - 3 variety obtained during the experiments was distinguished by the best technological properties. The linear density of the fiber was obtained at 141 mtex, strength 3.8 g/s, short fibers 9.5% and the highest maturity coefficient 1.8.

14. During three years of irrigation with wastewater during continuous cultivation of the crop, there is a tendency towards desalinization of the soils of the experimental plot.

15. Analysis of the system of indicators indicates that the Fergana-3 variety is the most effective for the farm. According to this option, the highest value of gross production per 1 hectare of crops was obtained (RUB 7,886), which significantly exceeds the values ​​​​obtained from a mixture of varieties.

16. In the conditions of the Volgograd Trans-Volga region, in a differentiated irrigation regime while ensuring maximum yield (1.71 t/ha) of medium-fiber cotton varieties, energy efficiency was obtained at level 2.

1. In the conditions of the Lower Volga region, it is possible to cultivate medium-fiber cotton varieties with a growing season of no more than 125 - 128 days, while obtaining a yield of 1.73 - 1.85 t/ha. Agricultural technology for growing this technical crop should involve the use of intensive technologies in the initial period of development.

2. The maximum yield of raw cotton is achieved by using a differentiated irrigation regime with maintaining soil moisture during the growing season: before flowering - 70% NV, during flowering - fruit formation - 70% NV and during the ripening period - 60% NV. As a mineral fertilizer on light chestnut solonetzic soils, ammonium nitrate should be used in an amount of 100 kg a.m.

3. To irrigate early-ripening varieties of cotton, in order to increase plant productivity and improve the microclimate of the cotton field, it is necessary to use conditionally pure wastewater in an amount of no more than 4000 m3/ha.

Bibliography Dissertation on agriculture, candidate of agricultural sciences, Narbekova, Galina Rastemovna, Volgograd

1. Abaldov A.N. Agroclimatic justification for cotton culture in the Stavropol region // Problems of the revival of modern Russian cotton growing. Budtsenovsk, 2000. - P. 51 - 55

2. Abaldov A.N. Cotton in the Stavropol region // Agriculture. 2001. - No. 1 - P. 21

3. Abdullaev R.V. Behavior of cotton varieties in wide-row crops // Cotton growing. 1966. - No. 6. - P. 42

4. Abdullaev R.V. Production and export of cotton fiber in the countries of Central Asia // Agrarian Science 2001. - No. 3 - P. 6 - 8

5. Abdullaev A.A., Nurmatov R.N. New and promising varieties of cotton. Tashkent: Mekhnat, 1989. - 77 p.

6. Avtonomov A.I., Kaziev M.Z., Shleikher A.I. and etc. Cotton growing. - M.: Kolos, 1983.-334 p.

7. Avtonomov A.I., Kaznev M.Z., Shleikher A.I. Cotton growing // 2nd ed. revised and expanded. M.: Kolos, 1983. - 334 p.

8. Avtonomov V.A. Irrigation regime for cotton in crop rotation on # salinity-prone lands of the Hungry Steppe.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sciences.1. Tashkent, 1991.- 175 p.

9. Agammedov Sh.T. Cultivation of cotton in the Shirvan steppe with rational use of water resources // Rational use of water and land resources in the Azerbaijan SSR. 1990. - pp. 11 - 19

10. Yu. Agroenergy assessment of crop cultivation technology // Met. decree. VGSHA. Volgograd, 2000. -32 p.

11. Agricultural technology of new zoned varieties of cotton / Ed. Ibragimov Sh.I. Tashkent, 1983. - 102 s.h.

12. Agricultural technology for irrigation of cotton // Proceedings of SoyuzNIHI. 1990. - Issue. 67.9 pp. 35 -39

13. Agricultural instructions for the cultivation of non-irrigated and irrigated cotton on collective farms in the Rostov region. Rostov-on-Don, 1953. - 72 p.

14. Akchurina N.A. Productivity of promising cotton varieties // Review, information. Tashkent: UZNIINTI, 1982. - 54 p.

15. Aliev K.E. Machine for modern irrigation of cotton by furrows and sprinkling (BDM - 200).: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. tech. Sci. - Ashgabat, 1965. 34 p.

16. Aliev Yu.N. Experience with wide-row sowing of cotton //

17. Cotton growing. 1967. - No. 4. - P.48

18. Alikulov R.Yu. Features of water exchange and drought resistance of some varieties of cotton under water deficiency in the soil: Abstract of thesis. diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Tashkent, 1992. - 21 p.

19. Aronov E.L. Russian cotton growing//Technique and equipment for rural areas - 2001. No. 4 - P. 16

20. Arutyunova L.G., Ibragimov Sh.I., Avtonomov A.L. Biology of cotton. M.: Kolos, 1970. - 79 pp. 20. Afanasyeva T.V., Vasilenko V.I. Soils of the USSR. M.: Mysl, 1979. - 380 p.

21. Akhmedov S.E. Reaction of cotton varieties to planting density in the Astrakhan region: Diss. Ph.D. Agricultural Sciences. Moscow, 1999. -175 p.

22. Babushkin L.N. Agroclimatic descriptions of Central Asia // Scientific. tr./ Tashkent State University, 1964. Issue. 236. - From 5 - 180

23. Barakaev M. Cotton irrigation regime and hydromodular zoning of the irrigated territory of the Samarkand region: Diss. doc. agricultural Sci. Samarkand, 1981. - 353 p.

24. Begliev N. Increasing the yield of raw cotton, improving the technological properties of the fiber and sowing qualities of cotton seeds depending on nutritional conditions.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Tashkent, 1985.- 151 p.

25. Bezborodoe A.G. Theoretical justification for irrigating cotton in furrows // Proceedings of SoyuzNIHI. 1990. - Issue. 67. - pp. 52 - 62

26. Bezborodov A.G. Dynamics of soil nutrients with water-saving technology for irrigation of cotton // Abstracts of reports of the scientific and technical conference of the Moscow State Medical Institute. - Moscow, 1991. - P. 3

27. Bezborodov Yu.G., Bezdorodov Yu.G. The structure of soil air in a cotton field and cotton yield // Agrarian Science, 2002. No. 8-P. 14-15

28. Belousov M.A. Patterns of growth and development of cotton. -Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1965. 32 p.

29. Bespalov N.F. Syrdarya region // Irrigation regimes and hydromodular zoning in the Uzbek SSR. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1971.-P.48-100

30. Bespalov S.N. Methods and regime of irrigation of various varieties of cotton in the conditions of the Chirchik - Angren Valley.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1985. - 185 p.

31. Bogatyrev S.M. Environmental assessment of the effectiveness of using sewage sludge as fertilizer in the conditions of the Kursk region: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Kursk, 1999. - From 5 - 59.

32. Budanov M.F. On the suitability of waters containing phenols for irrigation of agricultural crops. -M.: Kolos, 1965. 11 p.

33. Bylina M. Fundamentals of agricultural production technology // Agriculture and crop production. 2000

34. Vavilov P.P. Plant growing. M.: Agropromizdat, 1986. - P. 438

35. Vakulin A.A., Abramov B.A. et al. Irrigation and watering with wastewater//

36. Housing and communal services of the BSSR. Minsk, 1984. - Issue 4.1. pp. 25-30.

37. Walker W., Stringham G. Furrow irrigation uniformity and efficiency. Irrigation As., 1983, p. 231 -237

38. Wang X., Whister F.D. Analysis of the effects of weather factors on predictor cotton growth and yield. Bull. Mississippi agr. and forestry station10. 14 Mississippi State, 1994

39. Vaitenok F.V. Improving selection and seed production of cotton. - Tashkent, 1980. 20 P.

40. Waste Irrigation in Developing Contries. World Bank Technical Paper

41. Number 51/ The World Bank Washington, D.C. USA. 1986. - 325.

42. William V.P. Irrigation fields // Collected works 1.2 M.: Selkhozgiz, 1950.-T2-452 p.

43. Cotton plantations are being revived // Financial news / Agricultural Economics of Russia. 1998. - No. 7 - P. 33

44. Issues of genetics, selection and seed production of cotton / Ed. Egamberdiev A.E. Tashkent: VNIISSKH, 1991.- 114 p.

45. Vorobyova R.P. Use of wastewater for irrigation in the Altai Territory / Integrated use of water resources and water protection. // MiVH. 2001. - No. 4 - P. 30 - 34.

46. ​​Voronin N.G., Bocharov V.P. Use of wastewater for irrigation of agricultural crops in the Volga region.-M.: Rosagroproizdat, 1988. - P. 25-33

47. Gavrilov A.M. Scientific basis for the conservation and reproduction of soil fertility in agricultural landscapes of the Lower Volga region. Volgograd, 1997.-182 p.

48. Ganzhara N.F. Soil science. - M.: Agroconsult, 2001. 392 p.

49. Genetics, selection and seed production of cotton / Ed. Mirakhmedova S.M. Tashkent, 1987. - 178 p.

50. Gildiev S.A., Nabizhodzhaev S.S. The influence of various irrigation rates on the growth, development and productivity of cotton // Proceedings of the Union of Scientific Research Institutes, 1964. Vol. 2

51. Ginzburg K.E. Phosphorus of the main soil types of the USSR. M.: Nauka, 1981. -181 p.

52. Gorenberg Y.H. Irrigation regimes for cotton depending on standing density // Cotton Growing. - 1960. No. 4 - P. 45 - 48

53. Gorbunov N.I., Bekarevich N.E. Soil crust during cotton irrigation. M.: Publishing house. Academician Sciences of the USSR, 1955. - 45 p.

54. Gostishchev D.P., Kastrikina N.I. Use of wastewater for irrigation of agricultural crops/ STO of agriculture. -M.: Rosselkhozizdat, 1982.-48 p.

55. Grammaticati O.G. Conditions of use for irrigation of water of high mineralization // Improving the quality of irrigation water // Sat. scientific works of VASKHNIL/Agropromizdat. M. - 1990. - P. 64.

56. Grigorenkova E.N. Ecological and biological foundations and prospects for cotton cultivation in the Astrakhan region // Final scientific conference of the ASPU: Abstracts. report Botany / ASPU - Astrakhan, 1998. - P. 5

57. Grigorov M.S., Ovchinnikov A.S., Semenenko S.Ya. Subsurface irrigation with wastewater: Lectures of the All-Russian Agricultural Institute. Volgograd, 1989. - P. 52

58. Grigorov M.S., Akhmedov A.D. The influence of subsurface irrigation on the water-physical properties of soil and the productivity of forage crops // Sat. scientific tr. Water-saving technologies for agricultural crops. - Volgograd, 2001. - P. 5

59. Grigorov M.S., Ovchinnikov A.S. Methods of irrigation with wastewater and ecology // Collection of scientific works. works of NIISSV Progress. Moscow. - 1998. - P. 256 -261

60. Guliev D.T., Alimbekov M.U. The influence of water regime on the growth, development and yield of cotton // Sat. scientific tr. SAOVASNIL. 1978. - Issue. 4. - pp. 13-14

61. Gyulakhmedov X. Optimal conditions // Cotton. 1991. - No. 1. - P. 42 -43

62. Dale J. E. Investigations into the stomatology of upland cotton. Annals of Botany., 1961, v. 25 No. 97 p.39 - 52

63. Armor B.A. Field experiment methodology. M.: Agproizdat, 1985. - 351 p.

64. Duisenov T.K. Irrigation regime and cotton plant density under different irrigation methods on Newly irrigated serozem meadow soils

65. Hungry Steppe: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1988. - P 4 - 128

66. Duisenov T.K. The influence of the method and technology of furrow irrigation on cotton yield // Technology of cultivation of new promising medium and fine-fiber varieties of cotton in Uzbekistan. Tashkent, 1991. - P. 24 - 27

67. Enileev Kh.Kh. Ways to increase the cold resistance and early ripening of cotton // Cotton growing 1963. - No. 12 - P. 19-22f 65. Eremenko V.E. On the lower limit of soil moisture before watering cotton // Cotton Growing 1959. - No. 12 - P. 53 - 58

68. Zhumamuratov A., Khatamov Sh., Ramanova T. et al. Distribution of chemical elements in soils of cotton-growing zones // Agriculture. 2003. - Issue. 1.-S. 13

69. Zakirova S.Kh. Irrigation regime for various varieties of cotton on skeletal deflated light gray soils of the Fergana Valley.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1986. - 190 p.

70. Use of wastewater for land irrigation / ed. Ph.D. those. Sciences Novikova V.M. M.: Kolos, 1983. - 167 p.

71. Isashov A., Khozhimatov A., Khakimov A. Problems of reconstruction and practice of calculating the irrigation regime for cotton in Uzbekistan // Melioration and water management 2001. - No. 2 - P. 12-13

72. Ismatullaev Z.Yu. Cotton plant in the zone of wind soil erosion // Agrarian Science, 2002. No. 7 - P. 14 - 15

73. Kaminsky V.S., Safronova K.I. Protection of surface waters in the USSR and assessment of their condition // Water Resources. Moscow. - 1987. - P. 38 - 40

75. Karnaukhova V.V. Meteorological conditions and cotton productivity / In the book. Issues of meteorology. - JL: Gidropromizdat. 1977. - Issue. 40 (121).-P. 30-36

76. Kasyanenko V.A., Artyukhina S.A. Revival of Russian cotton growing // Textile industry. 1999, - No. 2,3. - P. 18

77. Kasyanenko A.G., Semikin A.P. Results of ten years of work on selection, biological protection and agricultural technology of Russian cotton // Problems of revival of modern Russian cotton growing. - Buddenovsk, 2000. S. 25 - 42, S. 71 - 76

78. Kayumov M.K. Programming of crop yields. - M.: Rosagropromizdat, 1989. - 387 p.

79. Kelesbaev B.A. Development of a method for calculating the network of cotton crops.: Diss. Ph.D. tech. Sci. Tashkent, 1984. - 253 p.

80. Kovalenko N.Ya. Agricultural economics with the basics of agricultural markets. M.: EKMOS, 1998. - 368 p.

81. Konstantinov N.N. Morphological - physiological basis of ontogenesis and phylogenesis of cotton. M.: Nauka, 1967. - 219 p.

82. Kruzhilin A.S. Biological characteristics of irrigated crops. - M.: Kolos-1977.-304 p.

83. Kurbaev O.T. Water regime and productivity of fine and medium-fiber cotton varieties.: Diss. Ph.D. biol. Sci. Academy of Sciences of the UzSSR, 1975.-154 p.

84. Laktaev N.T. Irrigation of cotton M.: Kolos, 1978. - 175 p.

85. Lamekin I.V. Study of the possibility and development of agro-reclamation methods for cultivating cotton under irrigation in the semi-desert zone of the Saratov Trans-Volga region: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Saratov, 2001 - 221 p.

86. Larsen V.E. Mulching in cotton production in the USA // Cotton Growing, 1963. No. 9 - P. 53 - 54

87. Lvovich A.I. Use of wastewater for irrigation abroad // M.: VNITISKH, 1968. 207 p.

88. Markman A.L., Umarov A.U. Complex use of cotton seeds. Tashkent: State Publishing House of the UzSSR, 1963. - 55 p.

89. Marymov V.I. Neutralization and disposal of wastewater from industrial enterprises in the industrial zone in the Lower Volga region.: Diss. doc. agricultural Sci. Volgograd, 1975. - 360 p.

90. Mauney J.R. Floral initiation of upland cotton Gossyppium hirsutum L. in response to temperature J. Exp. Bot, 1966. - vol 17, - no. 52, p. 452 - 459

91. Matvienko O.F. The yield and quality of raw cotton depending on the timing of sowing, defoliation and air temperature. Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Tashkent, 1986. - 156 p.

92. Machigin B.P. Agrochemical properties of soils and the influence of fertilizers on the development of cotton // Sat. scientific Proceedings of CSCA/Union NIHI. Tashkent.- 1957.-S. 113-120.

93. Mauer F.M. To the study of the root system of cotton // Cotton Business. - 1925. No. 5 - 6 - P. 367 - 386

94. Mauer F.M. Origin and taxonomy of cotton in the book. Cotton plant: T 1.-Tashkent, 1954.-384 p.

95. Medvedev P.S., Azarkin N.A., Gaevsky K.V. Agricultural instructions for the cultivation of non-irrigated cotton on collective farms in the Stalingrad region. Stalingrad, 1952

96. Mednis M.P. Irrigation of cotton depends on the early maturity of the variety and the height of the crop. - Tashkent: Publishing house. Academician Sciences of the Uzbek SSR, 1953.

97. Methodology for determining the quality of raw cotton and its sale to the state // Tajik Agricultural Institute - Dushambe, 1985. - 14 p.

98. Methodology of field experiments with cotton under irrigation conditions // All-Russian Research Institute of Cotton Growing. T.: Ministry of Agriculture of the UzSSR, 1981. - 240 p.

99. Mirzambetov K.M. The influence of different soil moisture on some indicators of water and carbohydrate metabolism of cotton during different periods of its development.: Diss. Ph.D. biol. Sci. Tashkent, 1972. - 165 p.

100. Muminov F.A. Weather, climate and cotton. JL: Gidrometeoizdat, 1991.-190 p.

101. Muminov F.A., Abdullaev A.K. Agrometeorological assessment of moisture availability in cotton crops. JI.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1974.- 85 p.

102. Muravyov A.G., Danilova V.V. Guide to determining water quality indicators using field methods Ed. 2nd. St. Petersburg: Christmas, 2000. - P. 15

103. Muradov S.N. The influence of mass transfer processes on the use of water resources when managing the water balance of an irrigated area.: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. tech. Sci. Ashgabat, 1990. - 58 p.

104. Musaev A.I. Soil water regime during irrigation of forage crops with municipal wastewater on light gray soils in the southeast of Kazakhstan: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Dzhambul, 1985. - 219 p.

105. Mukhamedzhanov Z., Mirza Ali, Zakirov A. Temperature and development of cotton. -M.: Kolos, 1965. S. 114 - 119

106. Nazirov N.D. Cotton and fertilizer. Tashkent, 1977. - P. 34

107. Novikov V.M., Elik E.E. Use of wastewater in fields. - M.: Rosselkhozizdat, 1986. 78 p.

108. New cotton variety Kyrgyz 3. - Frunze: Ministry of Agriculture of the Kyrgyz SSR, 1985.-6 p.

109. Standards for labor costs for cotton production. - Tashkent: State Agricultural Industry of the UzSSR, 1987. 54 p.

110. Nurmatov K.N. Irrigation and a progressive method of cultivating cotton. T.: State Publishing House of the UzSSR, 1957. - 231 p.

111. Tillage and watering of cotton. Tashkent, 1990. - 120 p.

112. Ovchinnikov A.S. The influence of water and nutritional regimes on the yield of winter wheat under subsoil irrigation in the book. Improving the design of irrigation systems, 1981, pp. 51 -54

113. Ovchinnikov A.S. Technological foundations and efficiency of soil irrigation with livestock waste, the use of sapropels and sewage sludge in irrigated agriculture.: Diss. doc. agricultural Sci. Volgograd, 2000. - 555 p.

114. Ovtsov L.P., Semenov B.S. Use of industrial wastewater for irrigation of tree plantations in the Volga and Caspian regions. M.: Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation, NIISSV "Progress", 2000. - 155 p.

115. Report on the contractual topic of VNIISSV with the Gissar Valley Department of Irrigation Systems. The influence of watering disinfected water

116. BOXING ponds with waste water on the development and yield of cotton for 1972-1976 / Rep. Spanish Nagibin Y.D., 1976

117. Report on scientific research work (according to agreement No. 11/99 dated 01/01/99 on the topic “Develop a technology for growing cotton under irrigated waste water from the wastewater treatment facilities of OJSC Volzhsky Nitrogen-Oxygen Plant.” - Volzhsky, 1999. - 110 p.

118. Pankova E.I., Aidarov I.P. Environmental requirements for the quality of irrigation water// Soil Science. 1995. - No. 7 - P. 870 - 878

119. Pershin G.P. Efficiency of early nitrogen fertilizers on cotton: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1959.-24 p.

120. Poberezhsky JI.H. Method for calculating total evaporation during the growing season of cotton // Scientific. tr. / SANIGMI, 1975. Issue. 23. - pp. 121 -13

121. Ponomareva E., Tsai S. Formation of ridges // Cotton. - 1990. No. 5. -S. 29-30

122. Razuvaev V.S. Corn irrigation regime and optimal parameters of subsoil irrigation with wastewater from the city of Engels: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Saratov, 1980. - 142 p.

123. Reagan V. Brovn. Information on cottonseed Prootein form law - gossypol cotton. A Cooperative Effort of the Natural Fibers and Food Protein Commission and the Texas Department of Agriculture, 1980. - 13 p.

124. Rejepov M.B. Ecological regimes of irrigation of agricultural crops in the Arid zone (using the example of cotton).: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Saratov, 1997. - 21 p.

125. Irrigation regimes and methods of field scientific research / ed. Averyanova S.F. M.: Kolos, 1971. - 196 p.

126. Results of scientific research on industrial crops 1952 -1955. edited by doc. agricultural Sciences Sinyagina I.I. M.: Min. S.-kh. USSR, 1957.- 174 p.

127. Reshetov G.G. Reclamation of newly developed soils in Uzbekistan. - T.: Mekhnat, 1986, 160 p.

128. Reshetov G.G. Calculation of irrigation norms for cotton // Hydraulics and land reclamation. 1978. - No. 4. - P. 5

129. Reshetov G.G. Methodology for qualitative and reclamation assessment of soils in the Arid Zone for irrigation purposes.// Coll. scientific Proceedings of the Institute Sredagiprovodkhlopok. Tashkent. - 1982. - S. 3 - 18.

130. Ruziev I. The importance of combined crops // Achievements of science and technology of the agro-industrial complex / Min. SHRF. Moscow. - 2001. - No. 6 - P. 28

131. Rumyantsev A. Cooperation of CMEA member countries in the field of protection of water resources from pollution // Contribution of CMEA member countries to environmental protection. Moscow, 1982. - P. 218 - 224

132. Sadykov A.S. Cotton is a miracle plant. M.: Nauka, 1985. - 146 p.

133. Sadykov S.S. Increasing the early maturity and yield of cotton. -Tashkent: FAN, 1972.-323 p.

134. Sadykov S.S. The role of temperature and light factors in the transformation of the nature of cotton // Bulletin of Agricultural Sciences, 1963.-No. 3-S. 128-131

135. Sadykov A.S., Turulov A.V. Cotton leaves are valuable chemical raw materials. - Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1967. - 109 p.

136. Sanginov B.S. Released and promising varieties of fine-fiber cotton in Tajikistan. Dushanbe: TajikNINTI, 1983. - 64 p.

137. Sanaev N.N., Gubanova N.G. Drought resistance of cotton // Agricultural science. 2002. - Issue. 6. - P. 21

138. Sattarov F.M. Irrigation regime for cotton under subsoil irrigation // Proceedings of SoyuzNIHI. 1996. - Issue. 67. - pp. 68 - 69

139. Sattarov D. Variety, soil, fertilizer and harvest. Tashkent: Mekhnat, 1998 -192 p.

140. Sattarov F.M., Mednis M.GT. Irrigation regimes for cotton during sprinkling for lands with close and spongy groundwater // Scientific. tr. Union NIHI, 1974. Vol. 27. - pp. 92 - 100

141. Sattarov F.M. irrigation regime for cotton under subsurface irrigation // Proceedings of the Union of Scientific Research Institutes, 1990. Vol. 67. - pp. 68 - 69

142. Sakhim H.F. Irrigation regime and technique of furrow irrigation of cotton on meadow soils of the Chirchik-Angren valley: Author's abstract. diss. Ph.D. tech. Sci. Moscow, 1992.-21 p.

143. Sevryugin V. Evaporation during irrigation of cotton by sprinkling. -Tashkent, 1992.-211 p.

144. Semenov V.M., Baev I.A., Terekhov S.A. Economics of enterprises. - M.: Center for Economics and Marketing, 1996.- 184 p.

145. Sergienko L.I. Wastewater from the chemical and microbiological industry, their purification and use for irrigation of various agricultural crops in the Lower Volga region: Diss. doc. agricultural Sci. Volgograd, 1987.-T 1.2

146. Sergaziev A. Features of inter-row cultivation of cotton during irrigation by sprinkling: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Alma-Ata, 1964.24 p.

147. Sergienko L.I., Semenov B.S. Techniques and methods for increasing the efficiency of using livestock waste in irrigation fields of the Volgograd region / Sat. Use of wastewater for irrigation of agricultural crops. - V, 1990. P. 99 - 103.

148. Sergienko L.I., Ovtsov L.P., Semenov B.S. Environmental aspects of using wastewater for irrigation. - Volzhsky, 1993. 187 p.

149. Smith G.W., Cothrem J.T., Varvil J. In: Agronomy J., 1986, v. 78 No. 5 p. 814#-818

151. Sokolov AL. Modeling of irrigation in cotton farming // Land reclamation and water management. 1991. - No. 3. - P. 22 - 24

152. Soliev S.Kh. Technology of cotton cultivation in extreme climatic conditions of the Beshkent Valley.: Author, dissertation. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. - Moscow, 1993. 23 p.

153. Directory of agrochemist / Ed. 2nd revised and expanded. - M.: Rosselkhozizdat, 1980.-285 p.

154. Reference book on chemicalization of agriculture. M.: Kolos, 1969.-S. 152-159

155. Directory / Land reclamation and water management // Irrigation, ed. acad. Shumakova B.B. M.: Kolos, 1999. - 432 p.

156. Handbook of cotton growing. Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 1981. - 437 p.

157. Cotton Grower's Handbook / practical guide to mastering intensive cotton cultivation technology in the Karakalpak Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. Nukus., 1987. - 28 p.

158. Ter-Avanesyan D.V. Khlopchatnik-M.: Kolos, 1973.-482 p.

159. Technology for cultivating new promising medium- and fine-fiber cotton varieties in Uzbekistan // Proc. report scientific-technical conference/ NPO "SoyuzKhlopok" Tashkent, Karshi, 1991. 98 p.

160. Timchenko I.I. Use of industrial wastewater for rice irrigation in the Volgograd Trans-Volga region: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Volgograd, 1972. - 152 p.

161. Standard production standards and fuel consumption for mechanized field work in cotton growing / Standard production standards for manual work in cotton growing. M.: VO Agropromizdat, 1989. - 148 p.

162. Trapeznikov V.F. Irrigation regime for cotton with furrow irrigation and sprinkling on light gray soils of the Kopetdag Plain: Abstract of thesis. diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. Tashkent, 1989. - 24 p.

163. Trapeznikov V.F. Comparative economic indicators of cotton irrigation regimes and technologies // Development of the agro-industrial complex of the TSSR in new conditions. Ashgabat, 1991. - P. 66 - 73

164. Turaev T. Results of studying the irrigation regime of a new variety of fine-fiber cotton 6249. In the book. Irrigation of agricultural crops.: T 4. D ushambe, 1973.

165. Turaev R., Turaev A., Kurbanov E.K. Basic and repeated post-grain sowing of cotton and its water and nutritional regime in the desert zone of Uzbekistan // International Agricultural Journal, 2000. No. 6 - P. 54 - 60

166. Umarov A.A., Kutyanin L.I. New defoliants, search, properties, application. - M.: Chemistry, 2000. 141 p.

167. Faranzheva S.A., Gumbatov O.M., Guseinov R.F. Irrigation regime and cotton resistance to pests. 1999. - From 29 to 30

168. Fedodeev V.I., Ovtsov L.P., Elik E.E. Current state and prospects for the agricultural use of wastewater // Review information of the Central Scientific and Technical Institute of the USSR Ministry of Water Construction. Moscow. - 1990. - 42 p.

169. Kharchenko S.I., Volkov A.S. Fundamentals of methods for determining irrigation regimes. Obninsk: VNIIGMI MVD, 1979. - 44 p.

170. Cotton growing in Russia: history, prospects. Krasnodar, 1990. - 320 p.

171. Khodzhaev D. Water stress and crop quality // Cotton. - 1991. No. 2. -S. 49-50

172. Khusanov R. Cotton is the head of everything // Business - 1998. - No. 5,6. - From 34 - 35

173. Tsikeridze R.V. Use of industrial wastewater from Rustavi for irrigation of agricultural crops on light chestnut soils of Eastern Georgia. Diss. Candidate of Agricultural Sciences Sci. - Tbilisi, 1982.

174. Shavrokin P.I. On the toxicity of soil solution concentrations for cotton growth // Soil Science. - 1961. No. 11 - P. 44 - 50

175. Shakhmedova G.S., Asfandiyarova M.LLI. Prospects for cotton selection in the Astrakhan region // Problems of the revival of modern Russian cotton growing. Buddenovsk, 2000. - P. 43 -50

176. Shakhmedova G.S., Asfandiyarova M.Sh., Ivanenko E.M. Possibilities of cotton cultivation in the Caspian region. In the book. Agriculture and environmental management. - M.: MU, 1998. P 145-150

177. Shakhov A.A. Salt tolerance of plants. M.: Publishing house. Academy of Sciences of the SSR, 1956. -552 p.

178. Shevtsov N.M. Subsoil treatment and disposal of wastewater. -M.: Agropromizdat, 1964.- 141 p.

179. Sherbaev S. Irrigation regime for cotton according to the layer and turnover of the alfalfa layer when applying different rates of fertilizers.: Diss. Ph.D. agricultural Sci. VNIIH/ SoyuzNIKHI, 1970. - 174 p.

180. Shleicher A.Ch. Dependence of the magnitude of cotton fertility on the nature of development of the root system. Scientific tr./ Tashkent Agricultural Institute, 1956. Issue. 7.-S. 16

181. Shumakov B.B., Bezdorodov Yu.G. Resource-saving technology for cotton cultivation // Agrarian Science, 1997. No. 5 - P. 29 - 30

182. Shuravilin A.V. The influence of irrigation technology on the water-salt regime of soils and cotton yield // Current issue. Land reforms, 1997.-P. 185-187

183. Elpiner J.I., Vasiliev B.C. Water resources, modern features and prospects for water consumption in the USA // Water Resources. 1983.-No. 1-S. 163-170.

184. Yuldashev S.Kh. Cotton yield factors. T.: FAN, 1982. -S. 168

185. Ywamura T. Biochem. et biophys. Acta, 1962, 61, p. 472

186. Yasonidi O.E. Agricultural use of waste water. - Novocherkassk, 1981. P. 67 - 70