Chapter 14. LENIN IS A HOMOSEXUALIST.
1. Sensational discoveries by some historians about the alleged non-traditional sexual orientation of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin are circulating on the Internet and in modern literature. Volkogonov 666th published his secret discoveries on 05/03/1994. Then this article began to circulate on websites, and even today some authors refer to it. It makes sense to quote it in full:
“After a considerable period of time, more and more new facts are being revealed from the life and work of V.I. Lenin. Thus, from the recently declassified sixth archive of historical and other documents of the party, it became known that Lenin became interested in homosexuality while still studying at Kazan University. So, as a 3rd year student, he raped five first-year students and repeatedly robbed them of their money. When this fact became known, Lenin was expelled from the university, in response to which he organized a political strike, and in the portrait of His Majesty Nicholas the 2nd he painted a hanging genital organ. Lenin always went into exile with two chests of books. The author of these lines had a chance to look into these chests. And what did he see? One of the chests was filled to the brim with obscene pornographic literature, mostly of German origin, and it was this chest that Lenin never parted with, while the second was often sent simply by mail, or with any other opportunity. Moreover, from the same documents it became known that in order to satisfy his homosexual inclinations during his exile, Lenin was sent Y. Sverdlov, and he was sent at the expense of party money, and all this in full view of the ordinary honest people of the village of Shushenskoye. They also attracted a local blacksmith to their depraved orgies, who later boasted to everyone that he had also become a “socialist.” Almost all nights the light burned brightly in Ilyich’s exiled house, and the belated residents, looking at this, crossed themselves and tried to avoid the house far away. Lenin usually slept during the day. The author also visited the village of Shushenskoye, where 96-year-old village idiot Alafya Semiverstaya, deaf and mute since birth, told the author the following: When she was six years old, Lenin lured her into a house with his obscene books and repeatedly raped her, often using oral sex, after which He allowed her to look at some new book with disgraceful pictures. He saw how Lenin made love with a thin man with a beard, as they later explained to her with Ya. Sverdlov. During “love,” Lenin called Sverdlov Yashenka and Kozlik, and when he moaned and said that it “hurt,” Lenin affectionately patted him on the back and called him a “political prostitute.” Throughout her long life, Alafya Semiverstaya, knowing the greatness of Lenin and fearing Stalin’s repressions, did not talk about this side of Lenin’s life, and only in our time, during the heyday of glasnost, democracy and the debunking of party and other nomenklatura idols, with tears in her eyes and in her very voice, she told us this history. Unfortunately, Alafya Semiverstaya died two weeks ago. And in the village of Shushenskoye, they began collecting money to erect a Monument to her, as an innocent victim of political mockery.
“Nothing human is alien to me,” Lenin loved to repeat, laughing. Now we see to what extent he lived up to this expression.”
The text should be classified as sexual (pornographic) literature, which has nothing to do with history. As heroes of far-fetched scenes (you need to understand what time we are talking about, this is not modernity) people with the names of revolutionaries were chosen. Naturally, no documents found in the sixth archive of the party are given either links or copies. The very mention of the party archive and the declassification of some documents is the main argument of this entire version. But this falsification was compiled if it claims to be transferred historical events, obviously by people who have poorly studied the biographies of Lenin and Sverdlov. It would be enough for them to look at the date of birth of Yakov (1885) and the years of Lenin’s stay in Shushenskoye (1897-1900), then they would immediately have to abandon this colorful scene with “The Goat” and they would have to forget about the thin beard at the age of 12-13 or choose another more suitable hero. The authors should have known that party contributions began to be collected from party members only after the second congress of the RSDLP in 1902, and little Yasha (his name then was Yeshua) could not come to Shushenskoye with party money. The author did not write when he visited Shushenskoye and met with Alafya Seleverstovna. From the figures he gave, it turns out that it took place no later than 1987, and then he could have recorded her story on tape, on a voice recorder (they were already on sale), then there would have been material evidence. Of course, a chest of pornographic literature does not fit into any gate. How could a political prisoner purchase it, assemble it, and then move around the country with it. Either the author has ideas that these pictures were sent to Shushenskoye by his sister Maria from Belgium, or during his tour of Europe in 1895 he filled this chest with these pictures, illegally smuggled them across the border, and then, when he was sent from prison in Shushenskoye, in Moscow, his mother, Maria Alexandrovna, brought him this precious chest. Some kind of nonsense. Yes, and about the rapist Vladimir Ulyanov this is incredible nonsense. Lenin was always harsh, categorical, aggressive in words, but when it came to a fight, he always tried to leave and not get involved. There was even a case in 1918 when his car was stopped by bandits, he chose to simply pay them off, although there were weapons in the car. In words, on paper, he was merciless and demanded that thousands of people be shot, but he protected his life, Krupskaya, Armand, sisters and mother and avoided any clashes in every possible way.
2. The next discovery on this topic was made by Alexander Kutenev. Journalists from the St. Petersburg newspaper (“New Petersburg”) became interested in the new version and published their interview with him on October 27, 1995:
NP: Alexander Pavlovich, can you tell us more about the illegitimate children of Alexander 3? Alexander 3, indeed, had many illegitimate children, since he was an unrestrained and passionate man. Among the children there were also historical celebrities. In particular, Alexander Ulyanov, the elder brother of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin. The fact is that Maria Alexandrovna, Lenin’s mother, was a maid of honor at the court of Alexander 2. When Alexander 3 was simply a Grand Duke, he had an affair with Maria Alexandrovna, from whom she gave birth to a son, Alexander, as a girl. …… So Maria Alexandrovna indirectly influenced the fate of her eldest son. Subsequent children were not very lucky in such a family. Since Ilya Nikolaevich knew that the children were not his, he treated them as potential objects of his love affection. He never touched Sashenka as the king’s son, but Volodya received all his ardent unfatherly love. In his youth, Vladimir Ilyich was very attractive. No matter how the mother protested, she was powerless to defend her son: Ilya Nikolaevich reproached her with his own behavior.
NP: And what about Lenin?
AK: He remained a homosexual until the end of his days. By the way, this is known all over the world, only soviet people they knew nothing and lived in reverent worship of the leader of the proletariat. Antonioni made a film about great homosexuals, and Lenin is given a special chapter in it. Several books have already been written about this.
We cannot say whether Lenin subsequently suffered from his orientation or not, but in childhood this was also not an easy test for him: he grew up embittered and hated the whole world. In the gymnasium, he took out his anger on his peers, fought, beat his adversaries, and for all that, he, of course, was a very talented person.
NP: Where did you get such stunning information?
AK: This is also special and interesting story. At its origins is Marietta Shaginyan. In the 70s, this writer was writing a book about Lenin and gained access to the archives. Apparently, the keepers of the archives themselves did not know what was hidden in the papers behind seven seals. When Marietta Shaginyan got acquainted with the papers, she was shocked and wrote a memo to Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev personally. Brezhnev introduced this information to his circle. Suslov lay under pressure for three days and demanded that Shaginyan be shot for slander. But Brezhnev acted differently: he summoned Shaginyan to his place and, in exchange for silence, offered her a prize for a book about Lenin, an apartment, etc. and so on.
What evidence does Alexander Kutenev provide for his version? None, there is a link to Marietta Shaginyan’s memo, but it was about something completely different (and this is written about in Chapter 2). The emperor’s illegitimate child from Maria Alexandrovna Blank was discussed in Chapter 3, now we are interested in another topic - homosexuality. Kutenev believes that Lenin’s whole problem arose because of his father, it was he who seduced little Volodechka. This idea came to Kutenev’s head, but in order for it to be accepted by society, arguments are needed, but there are none. Yes, and it won’t, because you need to know history, and if you understand the atmosphere of the time and know how homosexuals behaved in those times, then it will be clear that in no way is this accusation of a crime against Ilya Nikolaevich unacceptable. According to the Russian Criminal Code of 1832, sodomy was punishable by deprivation of all rights of fortune and exile to Siberia. According to Article 995. “Whoever is convicted of the unnatural vice of sodomy is subject to deprivation of all rights of the estate and exile to Siberia for a period of four to five years. Moreover, if you are a Christian, then you submit to church repentance by order of your spiritual superiors.” According to article 996. “If the crime specified in the previous article 995 was accompanied by violence, or was committed against a minor or weak-minded person, then the person guilty of it is subject to deprivation of all rights of state and exile to hard labor in fortresses for a period of ten to twelve years.” How could a former tradesman, who with such difficulty made his way to the rank of general, became a state councilor and a hereditary nobleman, sacrifice all his property for the sake of a moment of weakness? This is unrealistic and unproven. It is clear that such acts would sooner or later be revealed, they cannot be hidden, and the result of such an investigation could lead to disaster for the Ulyanov family.
3. No less popular on the Internet is the discovery of Candidate of Historical Sciences I.V. Sokolova. Based on the study of the “white” spots and personal correspondence of the leader of the world proletariat, he came to the conclusion that Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin) was a passive homosexual (but in Volkogonov 666 he is active), and his partners at different times were Grigory Zinoviev and Leon Trotsky. Article by I.V. Sokolov is given below:
“I was interested in the archives of party workers of the so-called “Leninist draft.” In particular, I spent a lot of time working on the archives of those communist leaders who were later, after Lenin’s death, subjected to repression. I had the opportunity to rummage through the private papers of many of them and publish previously unknown ones. And only on one material there was a hitch. They refused not only to publish it, but even to discuss it. So since then I have not been able to make public what I discovered. historical facts. Probably because they are so stunning and unexpected... The editors of many publications, upon seeing them, lowered their eyes and muttered something unintelligible about how “the reader is not ready to find out about this.” I, however, believe that the reader should know about everything. Therefore, I still suggest that you familiarize yourself with the historical materials that I have discovered.
Before presenting archival materials, let us turn to the official chronology of that time, which was published in the latest, sixth edition of “V.I. Lenin, Biography", 1981:
“On July 8, 1917, Alliluyev and Stalin escorted Lenin to the Razliv station, where Lenin settled in the barn of the worker N.A. Emelyanov. (All this was undertaken with the aim of hiding Lenin from the official authorities, who were looking for him as a criminal). But, afraid of the surrounding summer residents - the petty-bourgeois public (it turns out that the summer residents are a petty-bourgeois public, which, however, did not prevent the party nomenklatura from beginning to “bourgeoisize” immediately after October), Emelyanov rented a hayfield 5 km behind Lake Razliv, where he transported Lenin and Zinoviev to boat into a prepared hut adjacent to a haystack, where there was a “bedroom for two.”
Where did Zinoviev come from? Was it because of the fear of the surrounding summer residents that Lenin moved into the hut? After all, summer residents were everywhere and wandered in search of mushrooms and near the hut. Yes, being locked in a barn was safer. After all, Emelyanov’s wife and sons brought food to the hut every day. Yes, and Lenin heated food over a fire in a pot. We read in the biography: “Lenin was extremely busy with work, writing articles.” Yes, he has written several articles that can take 5-7 days. But Lenin stayed in the hut until August 6th. Further we read: “Lenin took walks, lay in the sun, swam in Lake Razliv in the evenings, and fished.” This means that Lenin had a good rest for a month and then left for Finland. The main question: since Lenin was resting, what was Zinoviev doing there? Why does the biography describe in detail such moments as which street Lenin walked, which embankment or ditch he crossed; who was nearby at that moment, and the month of life with Zinoviev was carefully hushed up - I became interested.
Materials from the personal archive of Grigory Zinoviev, member of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, first secretary of the Leningrad Regional Party Committee: Lenin’s letter to Grigory Zinoviev (July 1, 1917):
“Gregory! Circumstances have developed such that I need to immediately escape from Petrograd. I can’t go far, things don’t allow me. My comrades suggest one place, which they say is quite safe. But it’s so boring to be alone, especially at a time like this... Join me, and we’ll spend wonderful days together, away from everything... If you can be alone with me, call quickly - I’ll give instructions that everything is prepared there for two people.” .
This letter was written in July 1917, when Lenin was about to leave Petrograd and settle with Zinoviev in Razliv, in what later became the famous hut. It was there that Lenin's relationship with Zinoviev developed. They spent a lot of time there alone, and, obviously, this completely turned Zinoviev’s head. Because in September he writes from Petrograd to Lenin in Finland. “Dear Vova! You won’t believe how much I miss you here without you, how I miss you and our caresses... You won’t believe how I haven’t touched anyone since you left. You can be absolutely sure of my feelings for you and my loyalty. Believe me, I have never touched a man, much less a woman, and never will. Only you are mine close person... Come, don’t be afraid, I’ll arrange everything in the best possible way.”
Probably Lenin did not respond to this letter, and then Zinoviev, a week later, wrote the following, following the first: “Dear Vova! You don’t answer me, you probably forgot your Hershele... And I have prepared a wonderful corner for you and me. We can go there any time we want. This is a wonderful apartment where we will feel good and no one will interfere with our love. It will be just as good as before. I remember how happy it was for me to meet you. Do you remember, back in Geneva, when we had to hide from this woman... No one will understand us, our feeling, our mutual affection... Come quickly, I’m waiting for you, my flower. Yours, Herschel."
At the end of October, the comrades in the party struggle finally met. The October Revolution happened, and Lenin returned to Petrograd. Zinoviev went to Moscow at this time to supervise the completion of the coup there. From there he writes to Lenin: “Ilyich! I completed everything you assigned me. And what I haven’t done yet, I will definitely do... It’s very difficult and difficult here, but the thought that in a few days I will see you and embrace you in my arms warms me. Are you guarding our nest? Don't you take others there? I am very worried here, and only the hope of your fidelity warms me. I kiss you on your Marxist ass. Yours, Herschel."
When reading these notes, two questions immediately arose in my mind. First, who was the woman from whom Lenin and Zinoviev were hiding in Geneva? And the second question is which of them was an active lover and who was a passive one. It soon became clear who that woman was. In 1918, Zinoviev already wrote about her more specifically: “Vova! Every time I find myself far from you, I suffer terribly. It always seems to me that I’m sitting here, missing you, and you’re cheating on me at this very moment. You're a big spoiler, I know... It's not always possible to resist, especially when separated from your loved one. But I hold on and don’t allow myself anything. And your situation is bad - you need to always be close to Nadya. I understand you, I understand everything... And how hard it is to pretend to others, I also understand. Now at least it has become a little easier - there is no need to hide anything from her. It’s not like back in Geneva, when she first found us.” You must understand that then in Geneva, when Zinoviev and Lenin first got together in bed, Nadezhda Krupskaya, Ulyanov’s common-law wife, caught them doing it. And then, after, Lenin had already opened up to her, and she came to terms with his inclinations and did not interfere with the rapidly progressing romance with Zinoviev. Then the answer to the second question appeared. In the next letter to Lenin from the front, Zinoviev asks jokingly: “Vova! Has your butt become overgrown during our separation? Hasn’t it become already during this time?.. I’ll come soon, as soon as I’ve dealt with things here, and we’ll start cleaning your cute ass.”
This means that Lenin was passive, and Zinoviev was an active lover. And this is confirmed by the following letter. It was written from near Narva in the spring of 1918, when Yudenich was defeated. The Red Army stopped at the Estonian border, and Zinoviev was going to return with victory to Petrograd. He rejoices and completely loses caution in his expressions.
“Vova, I’ll come soon and I won’t let you out of my arms again, no matter what this grim thing says! The enemy is running along the entire front and, I think, will not come from this side anymore. So wait for me and hurry up to wash yourself, I’ll be there soon.”
However, not even a few months have passed before a break is brewing in the lovers’ relationship. As always happens in such cases, it is associated with jealousy. We learn about this from a letter from Lenin himself, which he wrote to Zinoviev, who was at that time in the North Caucasus. For some reason Lenin writes to him in German. “Dear Hershele! You shouldn't be offended at me at all. I feel that you are deliberately prolonging your stay in the Caucasus, although the situation does not require this at all. You're probably offended by me. But it's not my fault. These are all your stupid suspicions. As for Leiba and me, it was only once and will not happen again... I’m waiting for you, and we will make peace in our wonderful nest.”
And the signature at the end in Russian: “Vova is always yours.”
“Ilyich,” Zinoviev’s response immediately follows from Vladikavkaz.
– These are not at all stupid suspicions about you and Leiba. Who didn't see how you circled everything around him? Lately? In any case, I have eyes, and I’ve known you long enough to judge... Shouldn’t I know how your eyes light up when you see a man with a big gun. You yourself have always said that small-figured men have magnificent weapons... I’m not blind and I saw perfectly well that you were ready to forget our love for the sake of a romance with Leiba. Of course, he is next to you now and it is easy for him to seduce you. Or were you the one who seduced him?..” Indeed, at that time Leiba Trotsky, the People’s Commissar for Military Affairs of the Republic, was in Moscow for a long time next to Lenin. And, presumably, this is where a mutual feeling arose between the two leaders.
Leiba Trotsky, the gallant People's Commissar of Defense, fiery tribune and orator, took Zinoviev's place in Lenin's bed. Lenin continued to make excuses to Grigory. He probably felt that his relationship with Trotsky would not last long, and that Lev Davydovich would soon leave him, carried away by another woman. Yet Trotsky was more inclined towards women than towards his comrades in the revolutionary struggle. Only, probably, he made an exception for Lenin and respected him. And so Lenin writes to Zinoviev in the Caucasus:
“Don’t be offended by me, Hershele. You're right, I really couldn't resist. Leiba is such a brutal man. He just envelops me with his affection. And I need it so much, especially at such a tense political moment. It’s very difficult for me without affection, and you left, you scoundrel. So I couldn’t resist. But you will forgive me this little weakness, Hershele? Come back and you will see that I am full of love for you. Your little Vova."
Probably this little passage with “little Vova” finally calmed Zinoviev. He became firmly convinced that their connection was not interrupted, but was only temporarily overshadowed by the connection between “Vova” and the insidious Leiba the seducer. Grigory rushed to Moscow, and since then there are no more corresponding letters in his archive. Perhaps the lovers found a different way of communication, or Zinoviev later destroyed traces of correspondence...
Soon, however, the villainous bullet of the Socialist-Revolutionary Kaplan severely damaged Lenin’s health. From then on, it was undermined, and gradually Lenin’s sexual relations with Grigory came to naught. In any case, the last note related to this issue was a few lines written in Krupskaya’s hand. She writes to Zinoviev in the middle of twenty-two:
“I ask you not to bother my husband anymore with your harassment and requests for a date. It's time for you to calm down too. How long can I tolerate such shamelessness of yours! Ilyich is sick, you know that, and it is unnecessary to tell you, an adult, that your pranks this time can only completely undermine Ilyich’s health. I ask you to no longer persuade him to do what he has always been too willing to do. I hope you will understand this letter of mine. It was dictated by concern for my husband’s health.” It is no coincidence that Zinoviev often spoke disrespectfully about Krupskaya in letters to Lenin: “That woman who interfered with us in Geneva.” Now she has taken revenge. Being rejected by her own husband for so many years for her lover was difficult to bear. Now, when Lenin fell ill and became helpless, Nadezhda Konstantinovna decided to put everything in its place. She no longer allowed her husband to meet alone with Zinoviev - only in the presence of herself or other members of the Politburo.
At the end of the thirties, after the arrest and execution of Zinoviev, these archival materials fell into the hands of the NKVD and, undoubtedly, were reported to Stalin. Why didn't he order their destruction?
Probably for two reasons. Firstly, all this, undoubtedly, was not a secret to him. And he was already well aware of Lenin’s relations with Zinoviev and Trotsky. It is no coincidence that Stalin’s disdainful attitude towards Krupskaya is emphasized. Why should he respect her if he knew that she was just a screen for her husband’s pleasures? The second reason was probably that Stalin decided to hold on to these letters in case the time came to posthumously discredit Lenin. If at some stage Stalin suddenly decided to abandon the “Leninist legacy” and remain the only unsullied fighter of the revolution, these letters would be very useful to him.
One way or another, the archive has survived to this day. And we may be surprised to discover that Lenin was an ordinary homosexual.”
I.V. Sokolov, candidate of historical sciences.
And again the same problem - the author talks about the discovery of new previously unknown documents. This is a serious fact and requires proof; the author must provide the scientific community with their originals or copies, but at the same time indicate the exact address where the original can be found, so that anyone interested in the topic can verify for themselves the authenticity of the letters and even conduct an examination of the handwriting.
Oddly enough, this article is also full of flaws. The author did not even bother to look in the reference book and check the dates. I think that the calculation was on a magical phrase (PhD in Historical Sciences), which was supposed to hypnotize the majority and make readers take the author’s word for it.
Now let's turn to the topic. So let's start with the dates.
1. “Lenin’s letter to Grigory Zinoviev (July 1, 1917) is quoted: “Grigory! Circumstances have developed such that I need to immediately hide from Petrograd.” Lenin could not have written a letter with such content even theoretically on July 1st. There was no reason to worry. Only after the uprising on July 4-5 in Petrograd, an article appeared in newspapers under the title: “Lenin, Ganetsky and Co. are spies!” The prosecutor issued an arrest warrant for the Bolshevik leaders led by Lenin. After July 4, a dangerous situation arose for Lenin, and from July 5 he switched to an illegal position - in three days he changed three places of residence. On July 7, a decree of the Provisional Government was published to arrest and bring to trial Lenin and a number of other Bolsheviks; Cadet newspapers demanded Lenin’s appearance at trial. By decision of the Central Committee, Lenin was hidden in the house of N.A. Emelyanov at the Razliv station. After some time, Zinoviev arrived there, and Emelyanov took them across the lake by boat and settled them in a hut. Lenin could have written a letter with similar content on July 8-9, although there was no need for this - Zinoviev, the second person in the party, urgently needed to hide from the government's bloodhounds (he was second after Lenin in the Bolshevik list for elections to the Constituent Assembly) . Moreover, Zinoviev was the organizer and leader of the action of the Bolsheviks and sailors from Kronstadt. And in the event of arrest, Zinoviev’s sentence would be unequivocal. There was no need to persuade Zinoviev. The difference in numbers is only one week (1 or 8), but it is significant, and at the same time the letter from the 1st loses its semantic meaning altogether.
2. Next, Sokolov cites a letter that Zinoviev wrote from Petrograd to Lenin in Finland in September. The letter is very strange, especially considering that Lenin moved from place to place: from Yalkale to Helsingfors, and then to Vyborg, he could be arrested at any moment, he used all his conspiratorial skills to hide and stay alive, and here this a phrase as if from the supreme ruler: “Come, don’t be afraid, I will arrange everything in the best possible way.” Only at the beginning of October, V. I. Lenin returned illegally to Petrograd and settled in the apartment of M. V. Feofanova - this was his last safe house. The author of the letter with such content, dating it in September 1917, did not try to delve into the criticality of the situation when the question was being decided - whether there would be a revolution or not, - whether Lenin would be alive or not. And in the next letter, which Zinoviev allegedly sent after him in October on the eve of the revolution, everything is amazing - what kind of revolution there is, what kind of police, what fears, the apartment has been rented, a paradise for solitude has been prepared: “Come quickly, I’m waiting for you, my flower. Yours, Herschel."
3. We continue to read this opus carefully: “At the end of October, the comrades in the party struggle finally met. The October Revolution happened, and Lenin returned to Petrograd. Zinoviev went to Moscow at this time to supervise the completion of the coup there. From there he writes to Lenin.”
Under the leadership of Trotsky, on October 25, 1917, the Bolsheviks took power in Petrograd. On October 27, 1917, the All-Russian Executive Committee of Railway Workers (VIKZHEL) threatened to declare a strike in transport. Zinoviev, Kamenev, Nogin and Rykov spoke out in favor of holding negotiations with the committee, Lenin and Trotsky interrupted the negotiations. In response, on November 4, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Rykov, Nogin and Milyutin submitted statements of resignation from the Central Committee. Zinoviev was sent to Kyiv to establish Soviet power for disagreeing with the leader, but in December he was forgiven and returned to Petrograd. Zinoviev could not write from Moscow in November 1917.
4. “Nadezhda Krupskaya - Ulyanov’s common-law wife.” Krupskaya was the officially registered and married wife of Vladimir Ilyich.
5. “It was written from near Narva in the spring of 1918, when Yudenich was defeated. Yudenich launched his first attack on Petrograd in June 1919; it was stopped at the end of July 1919. September 28. Yudenich's army broke through the front of the 7th Soviet Army and took Yamburg, Krasnoye Selo, Gatchina, Detskoye Selo; There were about 20 km left to Petrograd. After ten days of fierce fighting near Petrograd, Yudenich's Northwestern Army began retreating on November 2, 1919 to the borders of Estonia in the Narva region. In February 1918, German troops were moving towards Petrograd, so the Brest Peace Treaty was hastily signed, and on March 11, Lenin and his government moved to Moscow. Yudenich at that time was in Finland, which declared its independence and became a sovereign country.
6. “We learn about this from Lenin’s own letter, which he wrote to Zinoviev, who was at that time in the North Caucasus.” Zinoviev was not in the North Caucasus in 1918; Soviet power was established there by Ordzhonikidze and Kirov. Zinoviev, after being exiled to Kyiv in December 1917, was appointed chairman of the Petrograd Soviet. From March 1918, throughout the Civil War, he held the posts of Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the Petrograd Labor Commune, Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the Union of Communes of the Northern Region (May 1918 - February 1919) and Chairman of the Committee for the Revolutionary Defense of Petrograd, as well as a member of the Revolutionary Military Council of the 7th Army . Although Lenin and the entire leadership of the country moved, and Moscow was declared the capital, Petrograd did not lose its important strategic importance for the revolution, and Zinoviev was entrusted with the responsible task of organizing defense and normalizing life in the city. The situation was even catastrophic; there was no time for business trips to the Caucasus. Zinoviev did not leave Petrograd in 1918.
7. “Indeed, at that time Leiba Trotsky - the People's Commissar for Military Affairs of the Republic - was in Moscow for a long time next to Lenin. And, presumably, this is where a mutual feeling arose between the two leaders.
Leiba Trotsky, the gallant People’s Commissar of Defense, fiery tribune and orator, took Zinoviev’s place in Lenin’s bed.”
Trotsky was a tribune and orator, but he became the gallant People's Commissar of Defense only in 1919, when the relationship between the lovers, according to Sokolov, ceased. “Soon, however, the villainous bullet of the Socialist-Revolutionary Kaplan severely damaged Lenin’s health. From that time on, it was undermined, and gradually Lenin’s sexual relations with Grigory came to naught,” that is, from August 30, 1918. And at that time, Trotsky was not yet a brave people’s commissar, he was just becoming one.
From December 1917, Trotsky held the post of People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs and negotiated with German ambassadors. Trotsky’s attitude of “neither peace, nor war: we sign no treaty, we stop the war, and we demobilize the army” led to the fact that Germany refused to tolerate further delay in negotiations and went on the offensive. The collapsed tsarist army could not offer any serious resistance, and the Germans rapidly advanced across the Baltic states towards the capital. Recognizing the failure of his policies, Trotsky resigned on February 22, and then moved to Moscow with Lenin’s government. Lenin and Krupskaya and Trotsky with his second wife Natalya Ivanovna Sedova and two sons settled in the Kremlin (Trotsky and his first wife Alexandra Sokolovskaya were not officially divorced). Inessa Armand and her children lived on Manezhnaya Square, opposite the Kremlin. Kamenev lived in the same house, and on the same staircase with Armand lived Lenin’s sister, Anna. Grigory Zinoviev, real name Ovsey Gershen Aronovich Radomyslsky or Radomyshelsky (mother - Apfelbaum), with his wives, Sarah Naumovna Ravich and Zlata Ionovna Lilina (née Bernstein), and his son from his second marriage, Stefan Radomyslsky, remained in Petrograd. Zinoviev became the master of Petrograd.
On March 14, 1918, Trotsky received the post of People's Commissar for Military Affairs, on March 28 - Chairman of the Supreme Military Council, in April - People's Commissar for Naval Affairs. Since there was virtually no army or navy, Trotsky was faced with the task of creating it and defending the revolution. One of Trotsky's first actions was the arrest, trial by a revolutionary tribunal and execution of the commander of the naval forces of the Baltic Fleet, Rear Admiral A.M. Shchastny. IN fighting Trotsky was forced to join in August 1918. From that moment on, he continuously traveled along the fronts of the civil war for two and a half years in his armored train. For the whole Civil War The “train of the Pre-Revolutionary Military Council” lost only 15 people killed and wounded, carried out 36 raids, covering a distance of 97,629 miles. For military merits, the team was awarded the Order of the Red Banner.
In those short periods of time when Trotsky was in Moscow, according to Sokolov, he managed to get into bed with the leader, a fact that is difficult to imagine, given that Trotsky was not indifferent to women; he did not let young and beautiful ones through. In the luxurious surroundings of the headquarters carriage of the armored train, which Larisa Reisner described, Trotsky conducted his “interrogations” of women, which always ended with sex. He later ordered some women who refused to follow his sexual fantasies to be shot. This carriage was visited by Larisa Reisner, a beauty, a professor's daughter, a poetess, who then married Trotsky's close ally, a red midshipman, admiral of the Volga Flotilla, Fyodor Raskolnikov.
In addition to these temporary hobbies, Trotsky had constant companions: two wives and two mistresses. The first wife of Alexandra Sokolovskaya, a girl “with tender eyes and an iron mind,” was older than Trotsky and bore him two daughters. When Lev and Alexandra were in exile, Trotsky decided to flee, his wife refused. On this occasion, Alexandra wrote to her friend: “Dear Lucy! We separated from Leo and, it seems, forever. I did not oppose his escape from exile. I realized that for me this was the end of our relationship with him. We treat each other well, but being husband and wife is not easy for us. Imagine, every free minute I wash my “hands and knives” and in “bed - bed...”. There is a big age difference between us and everything will be much more complicated in the future. The hours of love are fleeting, but it is difficult to come to terms with reality when he “needs”, I “don’t want to”, but he is so young, and I am so “old”! It’s difficult for me with him, very difficult! We were happy, I will be happy in the future with memories and our children, I am grateful to him for everything, he is the noblest person for us, we never fought with him, or rather he is with me, well, I... you know, but I I loved him and will love him... He still has everything ahead, I still have children, and they are beautiful. I didn’t make a mistake with him, but fate cruelly reminded me of the realities in our lives. That is why I did not object to his escape from exile, although our children are still small. This is how the inexorable and strict fate of Leva and I decreed.” Subsequently, Trotsky and Sokolovskaya met sporadically. Life separated them, but they maintained an ideological connection and friendship
Trotsky fled from exile in 1902 to Paris. There he met Natalia Ivanovna Sedova, who became his common-law wife. Despite the fact that Trotsky was officially married to Alexandra, Natalia was considered according to the party version as Trotsky’s second wife, bore him two sons and remained with him until his death in 1940 (she was three years younger than Trotsky and survived him for 20 years). In the headquarters carriage, meetings took place with his first mistress recognized by historians - with young Claire Sheridan, an English sculptor known for her works in England. She came to Moscow in 1920 at the official invitation of the Kremlin to sculpt a bust of Lenin. The second recognized mistress is the Mexican Frida Kahlo, a rich woman who inherited a decent fortune from her parents. She was a nymphomaniac and cheated on her husband, artist Diego Rivero. The Blue House, where the Trotskys lived, belonged to her. She also had a country estate, where Trotsky went in July 1937, citing the need to rest and hunt in the mountains, leaving Natalya alone. Then Frida joined him. Having learned about this, Sedova demanded an explanation in a letter to Trotsky, but then, after Trotsky’s assurances that she was his only beloved woman, she forgave him for this sexual weakness.
It’s hard to believe that such a macho, male, pronounced heterosexual (in 1918, Trotsky was only 39 years old), who had enormous power after the revolution, could be interested in an older man beyond his age (the leader was 47 years old), and also a sick man .
7. Now about the style of letters. The general tone of the correspondence is sarcastic, one might even say sardonic, the prospective lovers treat their passion as a funny prank. “I kiss you on your Marxist butt,” “Did your butt become overgrown during our separation? Hasn’t it become already during this time?.. I’ll come soon and we’ll start cleaning your cute ass.” But whoever wrote these lines never tried to understand the feelings of a homosexual suffering because of his gay, constantly hiding his feelings from everyone, even his loved ones, and depending on a partner, whom it is a hundred times more difficult to meet than for heterosexuals. Men who have found each other, and even older ones, communicate (judging by the published literature) in a different way, in a more romantic way. They write not about sex, not about “cleaning the butt,” but about their love and desire to hug and kiss their loved one. It is implausible that such experienced conspirators would openly communicate their inclinations, which are condemned by society. They had to understand that the correspondence could fall into the hands of officials, and then the authorities would have recouped completely, and the scandal could have been so large-scale that all their friends and comrades would have turned their backs on them. They could not write such letters at all at this time.
8. In the letters published by Sokolov, Zinoviev calls Lenin either “Ilyich” or “Vova”, and himself “your Hershele”. We must remember that Lenin was 47 years old in 1917, and Zinoviev was 34 years old. Lenin did not tolerate familiarity; from the time of the organization of the Union of Struggle group, he strictly demanded that people address him only as you and only by his first name and patronymic. Even his relatives called Ulyanov Volodya, not Vova. Lenin, in turn, addresses Grigory Zinoviev in his letters, calling him Hershele; in fact, Zinoviev was called as a child and youth Yevsey and Ovsei, or Gersh, Gershen, Gershon and Girsh, even his mother did not call Hershele. And Leon Trotsky was called Leiba only by outright anti-Semites. There was no point in emphasizing to Lenin Trotsky’s Jewish origins.
With these names, the falsifiers tried to lead the reader to the idea that Lenin, whose blood was a quarter Jewish, felt like he belonged among the Jews, and that it was Jews who were characterized by homo sexual relations, suggesting that in the Jewish community (Kagale) homosexuality is common. But this is an obvious lie and slander against Judaism, which since biblical times has brutally fought against all sexual deviations.
All this taken together suggests that the correspondence between Lenin and Zinoviev cited by Sokolov, a candidate of historical sciences, is an outright fake, everything in the letters is contrived, and illiterate and unprofessional, counting on sensation, noise, and ignorance of the majority of our history. So they labeled Lenin as a homosexual, and everyone started talking, some in a whisper, some loudly, and no one wants to listen anymore that this is nonsense. Someone likes to spread these rumors.
In reality, what was Lenin like sexually? From what we know, he was an average man in sex, but his relationship with women was also influenced by ideology. Lenin was a revolutionary fan, and this should not be forgotten; the example of Rakhmetov was always a kind of guiding star for him. Vladimir Ilyich reread Chernyshevsky’s book “What is to be done?”, weak from an artistic point of view, with a pencil. Chernyshevsky, oddly enough, was and remained the most outstanding writer for Lenin. As the leader of the party of a bright communist future, he believed that he must learn to control natural instincts, and not indulge them, but restrain and control to such an extent that he became independent from them and received satisfaction from spiritual communication with loved ones. This credo influenced his relationship with his wife and Inessa. In his letters to Nadezhda, he avoided words about sex, about his feelings after the night they spent together. Lenin rejected all ostentatious sexuality, both in his clothing style and in his seductive behavior; he visited art galleries with reluctance and showed no interest in painting and sculpture, not wanting to encounter images of naked women.
Illnesses, nervousness, disorders, insomnia - all this affected Vladimir Ilyich’s sexual potency (depression is a widespread cause of sexual dysfunction). The weakening of sexual abilities caused a painful reaction - the desire to stop sexual relations altogether. The conversation with Inessa on this topic was not easy, but after it he felt relieved. Having solved his problem in such a radical way, Lenin realized that the horror of the humiliating experiences that he had to experience as a man was over (with Krupskaya, because of her illness, they had been sleeping apart for a long time), that he no longer needed to be something like him obligated, being alone with them. Now he could live calmly next to them, maintaining his respect and love for them as for his mother and sisters.
The facts suggest that in 1913 Lenin gave up sex altogether. It was not only Krupskaya’s ill health that pushed him to this decision, but also his own. Lenin began turning to neurologists back in 1902. In the article “The Opportunist Professor about Lenin” A.I. Elizarova-Ulyanova wrote about Professor K.M. Takhtarev, who provided medical assistance to Vladimir Ilyich for a nervous shock in 1902. Krupskaya explained that “in London he reached the point where he completely stopped sleeping and was terribly worried. The congress clearly split into two parts. It seemed to many that Plekhanov’s tactlessness, Lenin’s “madness” and ambition were to blame for everything.” And that the disease was called “feu sacre” (“holy fire”). He spent two weeks in the Borchardt boarding house.” At the end of 1902, after the congress, Vladimir Ilyich’s nerves became so bad that he fell ill with a severe nervous illness. Krupskaya recalled: “When Vladimir Ilyich developed a rash, I took up the medical reference book. It turned out that the nature of the rash was ringworm. Takhtarev, a medic of either the 4th or 5th year, confirmed my assumptions, and I smeared Vladimir Ilyich with iodine, which caused him excruciating pain.” Lenin had to turn to a professional medical care. The diagnosis of doctors from the hospital was never given anywhere.
Headaches and spasms continued during his move from London to Geneva in the spring of 1903; on the way to Geneva, “Vladimir Ilyich was rushing about, and upon arrival there he collapsed and lay there for two weeks.” From that time on, spasms of headaches were his constant companions after overwork and nervous experiences. The spasms caused insomnia, irritability and anger. The symptoms of Lenin's disease completely coincide with the description of the disease atherosclerosis. Extract from the chapter “Vascular diseases. “Cerebral atherosclerosis” course in psychiatry: “Often in the initial stage there are headaches that worsen in a state of fatigue and mental overstrain. A characteristic symptom of cerebral atherosclerosis is sleep disorder, which becomes superficial, and there is no feeling of rest upon awakening.”
His wife recalled Lenin's constant nervous state. Heated arguments with colleagues and aggravation more than once led to nervous breakdowns. In Paris, in 1909, Krupskaya wrote: “I remember Ilyich came home after some conversations with the otzovists, there was no face on him, his tongue had even turned black. We decided that he would go to Nice for a week and relax there.” Rest allowed the nervous system to recover.
Biking and hiking relieved the discomfort, and at the first opportunity, when he lived abroad, he went to the park, out of town, to the mountains, to relax by the river, to the sea. After moving to Petrograd, all the positive effects of these medical procedures ended, and the ever-increasing tension and endless nervous shocks rapidly shortened his life. Even before Faina Kaplan’s assassination attempt, he most likely forgot about sex altogether. There was no time for him. Trotsky, just at this time, showed an increased interest in sex due to increased opportunities, but he was healthy and young (38 years old), and lived another 22 years, and if he had not been killed, probably much more. He was so genetically strong and healthy, and Lenin was already in his decline.
This will come as a shock to many readers. Especially for the older generation, who honored the name of Lenin and believed that he was the kindest person, but in fact he was cruel and shot people with his orders.
In Russia there are about 1,800 monuments to Lenin and up to twenty thousand busts. More than five thousand streets bear the name of revolutionary No. 1. In many cities, sculptures of Vladimir Ilyich rise in central squares. Although, if we knew the whole truth about the great leader, these monuments would have ended up in a landfill long ago.
Anatoly Latyshev is a famous historian and Leninist. Throughout his life he has been studying the biography of Ilyich. He recently managed to obtain documents from Lenin's secret fund and the closed KGB archives.
Anatoly Grigorievich, how did you manage to penetrate secret funds?
This happened after the August 1991 events. I was given a special pass to familiarize myself with secret documents about Lenin. The authorities thought to find the reason for the coup in the past. I sat in the archives from morning to evening, and my hair stood on end. After all, I always believed in Lenin, but after the first thirty documents I read, I was simply shocked.
What exactly?
Lenin from Switzerland in 1905 called on young people in St. Petersburg to pour acid on police officers in the crowd, pour boiling water on soldiers from the upper floors, use nails to mutilate horses, and throw “hand bombs” at the streets. As head of the Soviet government, Lenin sent out his orders throughout the country. A paper arrived in Nizhny Novgorod with the following content: “Introduce mass terror, shoot and take away hundreds of prostitutes who solder soldiers, former officers, etc. Not a minute of delay.” What do you think of Lenin’s order to Saratov: “Shoot conspirators and hesitators, without asking anyone and without allowing idiotic red tape”?
They say that Vladimir Ilyich generally disliked the Russian people?
Lenin's Russophobia is little studied today. All this comes from childhood. There was not a drop of Russian blood in his family. His mother was German with a mixture of Swedish and Jewish blood. My father is half Kalmyk, half Chuvash. Lenin was brought up in the spirit of German accuracy and discipline. His mother constantly told him “Russian Oblomovism, learn from the Germans,” “Russian fool,” “Russian idiots.” By the way, in his messages Lenin spoke about the Russian people only in a derogatory manner. One day, the leader ordered the plenipotentiary Soviet representative in Switzerland: “Give the Russian fools a job: send clippings here, not random numbers (as these idiots have done until now).”
Are there letters in which Lenin wrote about the extermination of the Russian people?
Among those terrible Leninist documents, there were particularly harsh orders for the extermination of compatriots. For example, “burn Baku completely,” take hostages in the rear, put them in front of the advancing Red Army units, shoot them in the back, send red thugs to areas where the “greens” were operating, “hang them under the guise of “greens” (“we then attack them and throw down”) officials, rich people, priests, kulaks, landowners. Pay the murderers 100 thousand rubles...” By the way, the money for the “secretly hanged man” (the first “Lenin Prizes”) turned out to be the only bonuses in the country. And to the Caucasus, Lenin periodically sent telegrams with the following content: “We will cut everyone off.” Remember how Trotsky and Sverdlov destroyed the Russian Cossacks? Lenin then remained on the sidelines. Now an official telegram from the leader to Frunze has been found regarding the “total extermination of the Cossacks.” And this famous letter from Dzerzhinsky to the leader dated December 19, 1919 about about a million Cossacks being held captive? Lenin then imposed a resolution on him: “Shoot every last one.”
Could Lenin so easily give orders to shoot people?
Here are some of Lenin’s notes I managed to get: “I propose to appoint an investigation and shoot those guilty of roteness”; “Rakovsky demands a submarine. We need to give two, appointing a responsible person, a sailor, putting it on him and saying: we will shoot if you don’t deliver it soon”; “Give Melnichansky (signed by me) a telegram that it was a shame to hesitate and not shoot for failure to appear.” And here is one of Lenin’s letters to Stalin: “Threaten with execution that slob who, in charge of communications, does not know how to give you a good amplifier and ensure that the telephone connection with me is fully operational.” Lenin insisted on executions for “negligence” and “slowness.” For example, on August 11, 1918, Lenin sent instructions to the Bolsheviks in Penza: “to hang (definitely hang) so that the people can see” no less than 100 wealthy peasants. Select “tougher people” to carry out the execution. At the end of 1917, when Lenin headed the government, he proposed shooting every tenth parasite. And this is during a period of mass unemployment.
Did he also have a negative attitude towards Orthodoxy?
The leader hated and destroyed only the Russian Orthodox Church. So, on the day of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, when it was impossible to work, Lenin issued an order dated December 25, 1919: “It is stupid to put up with “Nikola”, we need to put all the checks on their feet in order to shoot those who do not show up for work because of “Nikola” (t .ie, those who missed the cleanup day when loading firewood into the cars on the day of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, December 19).” At the same time, Lenin was very loyal to Catholicism, Buddhism, Judaism, Islam and even sectarians. At the beginning of 1918, he intended to ban Orthodoxy, replacing it with Catholicism.
How did he fight Orthodoxy?
For example, in a letter from Lenin to Molotov for members of the Politburo dated March 19, 1922, Vladimir Ilyich insisted on the need to use the mass famine in the country to rob Orthodox churches, while shooting as many “reactionary clergy” as possible. Few people know about Lenin’s document No. 13666/2 dated May 1, 1919, addressed to Dzerzhinsky. Here is its content: “...it is necessary to put an end to priests and religion as quickly as possible. Popovs should be arrested as counter-revolutionaries and saboteurs, and shot mercilessly and everywhere. And as much as possible. Churches are subject to closure. The temple premises should be sealed and turned into warehouses.”
Anatoly Grigorievich, is it confirmed that Lenin had mental disorders?
His behavior was more than strange. For example, Lenin often fell into depression, which could last for weeks. He could do nothing for a month, and then he would be overwhelmed by vigorous activity. About this period, Krupskaya wrote: “Volodya fell into a rage...” And he was also absolutely devoid of a sense of humor.
Was Lenin's style crude enough?
Berdyaev called him a genius of swearing. Here are a few lines from Lenin’s letter to Stalin and Kamenev dated February 4, 1922: “We will always have time to hire shit as experts.” You can’t “bring in trash and bastards who don’t want to submit reports...”. “Teach these assholes to answer seriously...” In the margins of Rosa Luxemburg’s articles, the leader wrote “idiot” and “fool”.
They say that Stalin organized grandiose drinking parties in the Kremlin during Lenin’s lifetime?
And repeatedly. In connection with this, Lenin often summoned and reprimanded him. But most often Ilyich scolded Ordzhonikidze. He wrote him notes: “Who did you drink and hang out with today? Where do you get your women from? I don't like your behavior. Moreover, Trotsky complains about you all the time.” Ordzhonikidze was still a party! Stalin was more indifferent to women. Lenin scolded Joseph Vissarionovich for drinking a lot, to which Stalin replied: “I’m a Georgian and I can’t live without wine.”
By the way, did Ilyich like banquets?
Feature films often show the leader drinking carrot tea without sugar with a piece of black bread. But documents have recently been discovered testifying to the leader’s abundant and luxurious feasts, about the huge quantities of black and red caviar, delicious fish and other delicacies that were regularly supplied to the Kremlin nomenklatura throughout the years of Lenin’s reign. In the village of Zubalovo, by order of Ilyich, luxurious personal dachas were built in conditions of the most severe famine in the country!
Did Lenin himself like to drink?
Before the revolution, Ilyich drank a lot. During the years of emigration, I never sat down at the table without beer. Since 1921, he quit due to illness. Since then I have not touched alcohol.
Is it true that Vladimir Ilyich loved animals?
Hardly. Krupskaya wrote in her notes: “...the hysterical howl of a dog was heard. It was Volodya, returning home, who always teased the neighbor’s dog...”
Do you think Lenin loved Krupskaya?
Lenin did not like Krupskaya; he valued her as an irreplaceable comrade-in-arms. When Vladimir Ilyich fell ill, he forbade Nadezhda Konstantinovna to come to him. She rolled on the floor and sobbed hysterically. These facts were described in the memoirs of Lenin's sisters. Many Lenin scholars claim that Krupskaya was a virgin before Lenin. It is not true. Before her marriage to Vladimir Ilyich, she was already married.
Today, probably, there is nothing unknown about Lenin?
There is still a lot that is not declassified, since Russian archivists are still hiding some data. So, in 2000, the collection “V.I. Lenin. Unknown documents." Some of these documents produced denominations. Before the publication of this collection, our archives sold falsified documents abroad. One American Sovietologist said that, having bought Lenin’s works for his book from the management of Russian archives, he then paid the publishers a fine of four thousand dollars because Russian archivists removed some lines from Lenin’s documents.
Lenin and up to 20 thousand busts. More than 5 thousand streets bear the name of revolutionary No. 1. In many cities, sculptures of Vladimir Ilyich rise in central squares. Although, if we knew the whole truth about the great leader, these monuments would have ended up in a landfill long ago.
Anatoly Latyshev is a famous historian and Leninist. Throughout his life he has been studying the biography of Ilyich. He managed to obtain documents from Lenin's secret fund and the closed KGB archives.
- Anatoly Grigorievich, how did you manage to penetrate secret funds?
This happened after the August events 1991. I was given a special pass to familiarize myself with secret documents about Lenin. The authorities thought to find the reason for the coup in the past. I sat in the archives from morning to evening, and my hair stood on end. After all, I always believed in Lenin, but after the first thirty documents I read, I was simply shocked.
- What exactly?
Lenin from Switzerland in 1905 called on young people in St. Petersburg to pour acid on police officers in the crowd, pour boiling water on soldiers from the upper floors, use nails to mutilate horses, and throw “hand bombs” at the streets. IN quality The head of the Soviet government, Lenin, sent out his orders throughout the country. A paper arrived in Nizhny Novgorod with the following content: “Introduce mass terror, shoot and take away hundreds of prostitutes who solder soldiers, former officers, etc. Not a minute of delay.” What do you think of Lenin’s order to Saratov: “Shoot conspirators and hesitators, without asking anyone and without allowing idiotic red tape”?
- They say that Vladimir Ilyich generally disliked the Russian people?
Lenin's Russophobia is little studied today. All this comes from childhood. There was not a drop of Russian blood in his family. His mother was German with a mixture of Swedish and Jewish blood. My father is half Kalmyk, half Chuvash. Lenin was brought up in the spirit of German accuracy and discipline. His mother constantly told him “Russian Oblomovism, learn from the Germans,” “Russian fool,” “Russian idiots.” By the way, in his messages Lenin spoke about the Russian people only in a derogatory manner. One day, the leader ordered the plenipotentiary Soviet representative in Switzerland: “Give the Russian fools a job: send clippings here, not random numbers (as these idiots have done until now).”
- Are there letters in which Lenin wrote about the extermination of the Russian people?
Among those terrible Leninist documents, there were particularly harsh orders for the extermination of compatriots. For example, “burn Baku completely,” take hostages in the rear, put them in front of the advancing Red Army units, shoot them in the back, send red thugs to areas where the “greens” operated, “hang them under the guise of “greens” (“we will then attack them and bring down") officials, rich people, priests, kulaks, landowners. Pay the murderers 100 thousand rubles each..." By the way, the money for the “secretly hanged man” (the first “Lenin Prizes”) turned out to be the only premium in the country. And to the Caucasus, Lenin periodically sent telegrams with the following content: “We will slaughter everyone.” Remember how Trotsky and Sverdlov destroyed the Russian Cossacks? Lenin then remained on the sidelines. Now an official telegram from the leader to Frunze has been found regarding the “total extermination of the Cossacks.” And this famous letter from Dzerzhinsky to the leader dated December 19, 1919 about about a million Cossacks being held captive? Lenin then imposed a resolution on him: “Shoot every last one.”
- Could Lenin so easily give orders to shoot people?
Here are some of Lenin’s notes I managed to get: “I propose to appoint an investigation and shoot those guilty of roteness”; "Rakovsky demands a submarine. We need to give two, appointing a responsible face, a sailor, placing it on him and saying: “We’ll shoot you if you don’t deliver it soon”;
“Give Melnichansky (signed by me) a telegram that it was a shame to hesitate and not shoot for failure to appear.” And here is one of Lenin’s letters to Stalin: “Threaten with execution that slob who, in charge of communications, does not know how to give you a good amplifier and ensure that the telephone connection with me is fully operational.” Lenin insisted on executions for “negligence” and “slowness.” For example, on August 11, 1918, Lenin sent instructions to the Bolsheviks in Penza: “to hang (definitely hang) so that the people can see” no less than 100 wealthy peasants. Select “tougher people” to carry out the execution. At the end of 1917, when Lenin headed the government, he proposed shooting every tenth parasite. And this is during a period of mass unemployment.
- Did he also have a negative attitude towards Orthodoxy?
The leader hated and destroyed only the Russian Orthodox Church. So, on the day of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, when it was impossible to work, Lenin issued an order dated December 25, 1919: “It is stupid to put up with “Nikola”, we need to put all the checks on their feet in order to shoot those who do not show up for work because of “Nikola” (t .ie, those who missed the cleanup day when loading firewood into the cars on the day of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker, December 19).” At the same time, Lenin was very loyal to Catholicism, Buddhism, Judaism, Islam and even sectarians. At the beginning of 1918, he intended to ban Orthodoxy, replacing it with Catholicism.
- How did he fight against Orthodoxy?
For example, in a letter from Lenin to Molotov for members of the Politburo dated March 19, 1922, Vladimir Ilyich insisted on the need to use the mass famine in the country to rob Orthodox churches, while shooting as many “reactionary clergy” as possible. Few people know about Lenin’s document No. 13666/2 dated May 1, 1919, addressed to Dzerzhinsky. Here is its content: "...it is necessary as much as possible faster end with priests and religion. Popovs should be arrested as counter-revolutionaries and saboteurs, and shot mercilessly and everywhere. And as much as possible. Churches are subject to closure. The temple premises should be sealed and turned into warehouses."
- Anatoly Grigorievich, is it confirmed that Lenin had mental disorders?
His behavior was more than strange. For example, Lenin often fell into depression, which could last for weeks. He could do nothing for a month, and then he would be overwhelmed by vigorous activity. About this period, Krupskaya wrote: “Volodya fell into a rage...” And he was also absolutely devoid of a sense of humor.
- Was Lenin’s style rude enough?
Berdyaev called him a genius of swearing. Here are a few lines from Lenin’s letter to Stalin and Kamenev dated February 4, 1922: “We will always have time to take shit as experts.” You can’t “bring in trash and bastards who don’t want to submit reports...”. “Teach these assholes to answer seriously...” In the margins of Rosa Luxemburg’s articles, the leader wrote “idiot” and “stupid”.
- They say that Stalin organized grandiose drinking parties in the Kremlin during Lenin’s lifetime?
And repeatedly. In connection with this, Lenin often summoned and reprimanded him. But most often Ilyich scolded Ordzhonikidze. He wrote notes to him: “Who did you drink and hang out with today? Where do you get your women from? I don’t like your behavior. Moreover, Trotsky complains about you all the time.” Ordzhonikidze was still a party! Stalin was more indifferent to women. Lenin scolded Joseph Vissarionovich for drinking a lot, to which Stalin replied: “I’m Georgian and I can’t live without wine.”
- By the way, did Ilyich like banquets?
Feature films often show the leader drinking carrot tea without sugar with a piece of black bread. But documents have recently been discovered indicating abundant and luxurious the leader’s feasts, about the huge quantities of black and red caviar, delicious fish and other pickles that were regularly supplied to the Kremlin nomenklatura throughout the years of Lenin’s reign. In the village of Zubalovo, by order of Ilyich, luxurious personal dachas were built in conditions of the most severe famine in the country!
- Lenin himself liked to drink?
Before the revolution, Ilyich drank a lot. During the years of emigration, I never sat down at the table without beer. Since 1921, he quit due to illness. Since then I have not touched alcohol.
- Is it true that Vladimir Ilyich loved animals?
Hardly. Krupskaya wrote in her notes: “... the dog’s hysterical howl was heard. It was Volodya, returning home, who always teased the neighbor’s dog...”.
- Do you think Lenin loved Krupskaya?
Lenin did not like Krupskaya; he valued her as an irreplaceable comrade-in-arms. When Vladimir Ilyich fell ill, he forbade Nadezhda Konstantinovna to come to him. She rolled on the floor and sobbed hysterically. These facts were described in the memoirs of Lenin's sisters. Many Lenin scholars claim that Krupskaya was a virgin before Lenin. It is not true. Before her marriage to Vladimir Ilyich, she was already married.
- Today, probably, there is nothing unknown about Lenin?
There is still a lot that is not declassified, since Russian archivists are still hiding some data. So, in 2000, the collection “V.I. Lenin. Unknown Documents” was published. Some of these documents produced denominations. Before the publication of this collection, our archives sold falsified documents abroad. One American Sovietologist said that, having bought Lenin’s works for his book from the management of Russian archives, he then paid the publishers a fine of four thousand dollars because Russian archivists removed some lines from Lenin’s documents.
Today's power-hungers steal in the same way as the fiery revolutionaries led by Lenin did in the last century. There is nothing new under the sun. Budget money was stolen and sent to the west, to the banks of the owners of this thief...
Joseph Stalin, who “violated the covenants” of Ilyich, is traditionally considered the most cruel ruler of the Soviet Union. It was he who is credited with creating a network of camps (GULAG), and it was he who initiated the construction of the White Sea Canal using prisoners. But they somehow forget that one of the first construction projects took place under the direct leadership of Lenin (Blank). It is also modestly silent about the fact that both leaders began their activities in the same team. And very few people know that huge state funds allegedly allocated for the most important construction issues, in fact, went abroad, to the USA - to the largest Jewish bankers of that time, who financed and organized the 1917 coup in Russia. The fact that many people do not yet know this is not surprising: all materials relating to the financial relations of the Bolsheviks with Wall Street were classified for a long time. Including by Algembe- the first attempt of the young Bolshevik government to acquire its own oil pipeline.
After dear comrade Vladimir Ilyich fell ill, and it became clear that he would not live long, comrade Lomonosov (Pegelau) moved abroad. In 1924-1925 he lived and worked in Berlin. And when the business trip was over, he decided not to return to the USSR and went to England, where his son studied at Cambridge. In 1938 he took British citizenship, then moved to Canada closer to his old trading partners from the USA, where he died in 1952.
As for the bloody construction site where fiery revolutionaries warmed their hands, neither railway, they did not build the pipeline: on October 6, 1921, by Lenin’s (Blank) directive, construction was stopped. Algemba cost a year and a half thirty five thousand human lives!.
The Jewish authorship of the “great Russian revolution” of 1917 was long and carefully hidden, just as the nationality of the instigators of this unprecedented genocide of the Russians was hidden. Today, for some reason, this information is no longer hidden by them...
Lenin's nationality, a small scandal with a lot of content
Artyom Denikin
What was the main thing in National Socialism - Nazism or socialism? The ideologists of the USSR made considerable efforts to reject any connection between Hitler's socialism and Soviet socialism. However, totalitarian National Socialism, which was built in the same way since the 1930s in the USSR and in Hitler’s Germany, was equally based on great-power chauvinism.
Hitler, in a letter to Stalin in 1939, admired his efforts to create a great power state. That neither Stalin nor anyone else disputed. It is what it is. This is precisely what explains the fact that the CPSU Central Committee purposefully hid the Jewish roots of Lenin himself from the Soviet people.
Discoveries of Marietta Shaginyan and Soviet historians
M.S. Shaginyan’s goal in life was to become the leader’s biographer. In 1938, in the first part of “The Ulyanov Family”, she placed the information she had obtained that in the veins of V.I. Lenin has Kalmyk blood. Krupskaya praised Shaginyan’s work. And both suffered greatly for their initiative.
On August 5, 1938, the Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks, in a special resolution, condemned and banned Shaginyan’s novel and reprimanded Krupskaya. Only in 1956, after the death of Stalin, the Central Committee of the CPSU, with its resolution “On the procedure for publishing works about V.I. Lenin" canceled the 1938 resolution "as erroneous and fundamentally incorrect."
From that time on, the Kalmyk roots of the leader were no longer considered shameful. But this is what concerns his paternal origin. But Lenin’s maternal line was considered shameful and blasphemous by the communists under Stalin, Khrushchev and Brezhnev, and is still considered so today.
In Shaginyan’s works, Lenin’s maternal grandfather A.D. Blank appears as a Little Russian (in a new way - Ukrainian). This option suited and still suits many people. In fact, Lenin’s maternal line has the same relation to Ukraine as to India or Africa.
Seditious research by Shaginyan and other Soviet historians demonstrated that Vladimir Ilyich’s mother, M.A. Blank ( Grosschopf), had Swedish roots on her mother's side. Her mother and grandmother of the future leader, A.I. Grosschopf, came from the families Grosschopf (father), Östedt (mother), Borg, Arenberg, and so on, far from Ukraine, and so on into the depths of history.
The study of Ilyich’s Swedish (not Russian, not Soviet and absolutely bourgeois) roots was a seditious and dangerous activity in the USSR, but, nevertheless, the Swedish Grosschopf line in the origin of Lenin was quite well studied by the end of the 60s.
But God is with them, with the Swedes. The most terrible shock for the ideologists in the CPSU Central Committee was something else: it turned out that Lenin’s grandfather, Alexander Dmitrievich Blank, was born as Israel Blank and, of course, he couldn’t be any Ukrainian.
Why did Lenin's Jewish origin frighten the communists?
Perhaps it was influenced by the fact that during the years of this discovery the USSR ideologically and politically fought with pro-American Israel. The USSR helped the Arabs in the war with Israel, and everything Jewish was very unpopular with our communists - at the forefront " cold war“Jews ended up with the USA. Jewish emigration began. In this situation, information about Lenin’s Jewish roots was extremely undesirable for the communists.
It is also significant, we think, that at the helm of the Soviet country the Bolsheviks placed louts who were far from culture, civilization and basic decency. Under the communists, the country was ruled by louts. Which is what Khrushchev and his entourage were.
Documents on the origin of A.D. The forms were identified independently of each other at the end of 1964 by A.G. Petrov and February 3, 1965 by Mikhail Stein, which the latter reported to M.S. at the same time. Shaginyan. Until now, to our knowledge, these documents have not been published in full.
Shaginyan, for obvious reasons, was unable to acquaint the public with these documents, but in her writings she made a vague hint about the origin of Blank. In the novel “The Ulyanov Family,” she briefly addressed the question like this: “...Alexander Dmitrievich Blank was from the town of Starokonstantinovo, Volyn province.”
What does the word mean "place"? This is a term, a euphemism, used for Jewish communities. Together with his brother A.D. Blank came to St. Petersburg to enter the Medical-Surgical Academy. But according to the laws Russian Empire, Jews were prohibited from being admitted to state educational institutions.
By 1795, Empress Catherine, during the division of Poland and Western Rus' (Belarus and Ukraine), inhabited by the largest Jewish diaspora, with Germany, drew a line on the map with a pencil beyond which Jews had no right to settle. Jews could, as before, live in Belarus and Left-Bank Ukraine, but did not have the right to be east of the border indicated to them. This line passed beyond the Belarusian cities of Vilno (Vilnius), Vitebsk, Bobruisk, Minsk and crossed Little Russia (Ukraine) in half. In fact, this was the former last border of Western Rus' (the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Russia, and then the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth) with Muscovy. This invisible line, indicated by the Empress, which prevented the Jews of Western Rus' from entering Eastern Russia, existed until the revolution.
Let's return to Lenin's grandfather. According to Russian laws, Jews still “had a loophole”, which provided that if they accepted Moscow Orthodoxy and were baptized with a Moscow name, then they became full citizens of the country (this discrimination applied equally to Catholics and Uniates of the Kiev Russian Orthodox Church).
This forced the non-dogmatically raised brothers Abel and Israel Blank to convert to Orthodoxy. It should be noted that Lenin’s ancestors betrayed - from the point of view of Judaism - not only their faith, but also their nation.
On November 19, 1998, Joshua Rosenberg, one of the leaders of the Moscow Jewish religious community, in Nezavisimaya Gazeta, in the article “Followers of “Messianic Judaism” are not Jews,” writes that Jews who abandoned Judaism are considered traitors to the nation, “and their descendants leave Judaism.” are no longer considered and are not Jews.” Thus, the Jewish world abandoned Lenin's relatives. But for historians, in fact, this does not matter at all, since they are studying not the question of whether Lenin is a Jew, but the question of his origin.
Here is the text of the handwritten statement of the Blank brothers from the Central State Historical Archives of Leningrad in the case “On the accession of students Dmitry and Alexander Blankov from Jewish law to our church of the Zhitomir povet school”:
“Having now settled in St. Petersburg and having always been treated with Christians who profess the Greek-Russian religion, we now wish to accept it. And therefore, Your Eminence, we humbly ask for the consecration of us with holy baptism to give the Samsonian Church an order to the priest Fyodor Barsov... Abel Blank had a hand in this petition. Israel Blank had a hand in this petition.”.
The baptism took place in July 1820 in the Samsonievsky Cathedral; at baptism, the brothers chose their favorite Russian name and patronymic. Historians have found many other documents about the Jewish past of the Blank brothers in the archives of the Medical-Surgical Academy. In 1965, these documents were removed from the archives...
Scandal
In his memoirs about subsequent events, Mikhail Stein writes:
“When the IML learned that documents about the Jewish origin of A.D. had been found in the Leningrad archives. Blanca, a terrible scandal has broken out. Reprimands rained down, some were fired from work. All archival files that could somehow reveal the secret about the Jewish origin of A.D. Blanca, were seized and taken to the IML. As the archive staff told me, the pages of the files were renumbered, in some cases the usage sheets were rewritten...
Soon after reading materials about A.D. Blanka, I was summoned to the Leningrad Regional Committee of the CPSU and advised not to poke my nose where they weren’t asked to go. A responsible employee of the regional committee told me: “We will not allow you to disgrace Lenin!” I was taken aback by such a phrase. But I immediately realized that my interlocutor perfectly understood the offensive meaning of the words spoken, and also that I had nowhere to complain. No one will believe it, and they will accuse me of slander and anything else.
Turns of history
All these scandals surrounding Lenin’s nationality seem insignificant only at first glance. They are really of little significance in relation to Lenin himself (whether he is a Kalmyk, a Jew or a Tatar does not matter), but they hide something else that is much more important. The CPSU Central Committee tried to hide the fact, obvious to historians, that the 1917 revolution was carried out by Jews…
Anyone who visits Minsk can visit the house-museum of the first congress RSDLP. This party then consisted almost entirely of Jews, and the main place in it was played by the radical "Bund", a social-nationalist Jewish organization, many of whose activists later converted to Zionism. A visit to the Minsk house-museum will show anyone that the revolution was prepared as a national liberation struggle of Jews and other peoples against the dominance of great-power chauvinism.
In the very first days of Soviet power, the communists published the fourth (after the first three, Lenin’s Decrees, so deeply studied in school) "Decree on the Most Oppressed Nation".
This Decree provided that Jews now have the right to enter any educational institutions without competition, have the right to move into any chosen housing - with the eviction of the people living there - and many other unjustified benefits in all areas of the life of Russian society, which had not previously known note, Jews ( full text The decree was published during Perestroika by the magazine Rodina).
But the most curious thing about this fourth Decree of Lenin is that every Jew, at whom someone looked askance at least somewhere, had to immediately report it, and the slightest manifestation of anti-Semitism was punishable, according to the Decree, by punishment right up to execution.
Today, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, represented by Makashov and other leaders, is concerned that “the number of Jews holding positions in the country’s leadership, among big business and oligarchs, on television, etc. does not correspond to the proportion of their percentage to the population of Russia.”
But let's look at a “sacred” thing for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation: the 1917 revolution itself. What kind of correspondence is there? in a state created by communists?
In 1917, Jews made up 1.1% of the Russian population. Writer Grigory Klimov (USA) - based on unclassified and publicly available state archives of the USSR - gives lists of the Soviet government in 1917-1921, which are easy to check:
The parties that made the revolution in Russia:
Here is a list of Soviet leaders in 1919.
Russians:
Latvians: Peters.
Other Jews:
Trotsky (Bronstein), Steklov (Nakhamkes), Martov (Zederbaum), Gusev (Drabkin), Kamenev (Rosenfeld), Sukhanov (Gimmer), Lagetsky (Krakhman), Bogdanov (Zilberstein), Gorev (Goldman), Uritsky (Radomyslsky), Volodarsky (Kogan), Sverdlov, Kamkov (Katz), Ganetsky (Furstenberg), Dan (Gurevich), Meshkovsky (Goldberg), Parvus (Gelfand), Rozanov (Goldenbach), Martynov (Zimbar), Chernomorsky (Chernomordich), Pyatnitsky (Levin ), Abramovich (Rein), Zvezdich (Fronstein), Radek (Sobelson), Litvinov (Finkelstein), Maklakovsky (Rosenblum), Lapinsky (Levinson), Bobrov (Natanson), Glazunov (Schulze), Lebedeva (Limso), Ioffe, Kaminsky (Hoffman), Izgoev (Goldman), Vladimirov (Feldman), Larin (Lurie) and so on.
Of the 545 people, 447 are Jews, that is, 82%.
Organs of terror. Commissariat of Internal Affairs: out of 64 members, 43 are Jews.
The first Leninist Council of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies in Moscow: out of 23 members of the bureau, 19 were Jews. And so on…
"Steamboat of the Revolution" by Trotsky
Instead of rubbing our eyes and seeing the obvious, today we are all captive to our myths. Communists and “patriots” of the CIS pathetically condemn the role of the United States in displacing the regimes of Milosevic and Shevardnadze. Fear God, how did the Bolshevik revolution go in our country? Yes, exactly the same!
The “steamboat of the Revolution” arrived from the USA in 1917 - it brought the Bolsheviks, who were financed by US Jewish millionaires interested in the collapse of the European metropolises and concerned about the fate of the Jews of Russia: then on the territory of Belarus, Poland and Left-Bank Ukraine about 70% of all Jews on the planet lived. And every single one of the Jews in the United States, including millionaires, were emigrants from here.
Everyone brought by the “ship of the Revolution” in August 1917 then took leading positions in the first government Soviet Russia. There are not only Trotsky and Uritsky, there are hundreds of people from the new administration: Soviet ministers, their deputies, heads of law enforcement agencies, bankers of the new country, etc.
All as one (and like Trotsky and Uritsky) - not only Jews, but all with American citizenship. While still in the USA, they discussed with the Jewish backstage of America what the newly created USSR would be like - from two positions:
1) interests of Jews;
2) US interests.
Every second person in the government of New Soviet Russia had this American citizenship, because he lived in the USA, waiting for a revolution to begin here. Lenin called them from Geneva.
We are now being told that the United States helped the removal of Milosevic and Shevardnadze, that the United States is meddling in Moldova, financing the opposition of Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, and then, quite brazenly, openly, a ship comes from the United States with supposed “revolutionaries”, who all have American citizenship, and they all become the new power in Russia. This is strange. Many of our streets are named after Uritsky or Volodarsky, but no one clarifies the fact that until their death the comrades did not renounce American citizenship. Just in case.
It turns out, our streets are named after US citizens. The CPSU elevated them into a cult without measure and for the sake of showing off, but these are actually Americans. Alas, there is absurdity around us. Gentlemen and comrades, you need to know your history in order to think about the future.
If in Minsk there are streets of American Jews Uritsky and Volodarsky, non-Russians who had previously demonstratively renounced Russian citizenship (deserters who fled the war) and accepted US citizenship through the efforts of the leaders of the US Jewish community, then Minsk residents should then expect that other US citizens will be here too continue to carry out their “revolutions”. One thing follows another for those who suffer from sclerosis and live on the streets of the USA in Minsk, considering this the norm.
This is October 1917 - USA product. No different from the resignation of Shevardnadze or the events in Serbia...
Analytical newspaper “Secret Research” No. 11 (76), 2004.
On the topic of the true role of world Jewry in organizing wars and revolutions around the world, you can read very interesting books David Duke, Andrey Diky, Nikolai Levashov, Anthony Sutton and other authors on -
The Red Army units created by Lenin and the Secret Police Agency, or Cheka, did not repent of using the most brutal methods to deal with monarchists and other anti-communist groups. Tsar Nicholas II, his wife and five of their children were executed by order of Lenin. In his telegrams to the military, Lenin ordered the shooting of those who resisted the communist regime. The Bolsheviks arrested tens of thousands of people for just one crime - resistance to the regime. Most of them were tortured and executed en masse.The famous Russian writer Maxim Gorky described examples of Bolshevik atrocities: “In the Tambov province, the communists nailed people with railway pins behind left hand and a foot to a tree a meter from the ground and watched how these strangely crucified people were tormented. They cut the prisoners' stomachs - they took out the small intestine and nailed it to a telegraph pole or tree - they kicked the person around the tree, watching as the intestine was wound around the pole. The captured officers were stripped naked and pieces of skin were torn off from their shoulders”... Orlando Fidges. The tragedy of the people. Penguin Books. NY. 1997 Page 775.
Horror enveloped Russia, but the communist atrocities were just beginning. (“2 minutes 5 seconds. Artificial famine - the cause of which was Lenin) When the Bolsheviks seized power, the majority of the Russian population lived in villages. The standard of living was quite miserable. Most peasants could barely feed their families with what they grew. Harsh winters in Russia made agriculture unproductive. But the decision made by Lenin in 1918 brought an even worse disaster on millions of peasants - who were already living in poverty. Private property was banned and the products of the peasants were confiscated by the state. Lenin implemented this policy with the help of his right hand, Felix Dzerzhinsky, head of the Cheka, well known for his ruthlessness. Cheka officers surrounded villages throughout Russia and robbed peasants of their food and livestock at gunpoint. Each peasant had to hand over his quota to the Bolsheviks. To meet this quota, the majority had to give up everything they owned. Those who protested were forced into silence in the most cruel way. On February 14, 1922, one inspector in the Omsk province wrote: “Frankly speaking, violations during the confiscation of food by requisition squads have reached incredible levels. Systematically arrested peasants are locked in large unheated barns. Then they are beaten with a whip and threatened with execution. Those who did not fulfill their quota were tied up and forced to run naked along the main street of the village. Then they were locked in another unheated barn.” The Black Book of Communism. Harvard University Press. 1999 p. 119.
Lenin was furious when he realized that the peasants were not meeting the quota. In 1920, he established new punishments for those regions that resisted food requisitions. The harvest in these places will not only be captured, but also all the seeds will be taken away from the peasants. Seed confiscation meant that the peasants could not grow a new crop - in other words: they would have nothing to eat. That's when the famine began. 29 million people within Russia's borders resisted famine. In 1921 and 1922, 5 million starved to death in the throes of death.
Lenin waited with great pleasure for what was happening. In his opinion, this hunger was extremely useful. According to his calculations, hunger will destroy people's faith in God and religion and force them to bow their heads to communism.
In the Black Book of Communism - which sent waves of shock throughout the world - this diabolical idea of Lenin is discussed as follows: as one of his friends later recalled - “Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov had the courage to openly publicly declare that this famine would bring numerous positive results ... famine - he explained - will quickly bring a new stage closer and usher in socialism - a stage following capitalism. Hunger will also destroy faith not only in the king - but also in God.” The Black Book of Capitalism. Harvard University Press. 1999 Page 123-4. This is what Lenin wrote to members of the Politburo on March 19, 1922: “The present moment is favorable to us. Thanks to all those who are starving, who will soon begin to eat human flesh, who are dying by the millions and whose bodies litter the roads across the country - it is now and never again that we can - and therefore must - confiscate all the property of the church with all the brutal energy we can muster. . Our only hope lies in the despair that hunger will create among the masses, causing them to look at us more favorably, or at least with indifference.” Russian Center for the Preservation and Study of Historical Documents. Moscow.
These reports from the Soviet archives revealed that Lenin deliberately caused this famine - which cost the lives of 5 million people. The same conclusion was reached by historian Richard Pipes, (7 min 39 sec. The Unknown Lenin) - who spent years studying the archives and wrote the book "The Unknown Lenin". From his point of view, “In relation to all humanity, Lenin felt nothing but contempt: man as an individual “was of almost no interest to him” ... he viewed the working class in the same way as a metallurgist views iron ore.” Richard Pipes. Unknown Lenin. Yale University Press. 1996 p.10.
Lenin not only viewed humanity as a species of animal - he also used animal methods in relation to it. In October 1919, he visited the Russian scientist Ivan Pavlov, famous for his experiments on animals. conditioned reflexes. Lenin wanted to use these methods as conditioned reflexes on the entire Russian society. Pavlov was shocked. “I want the masses in Russia to follow the communist way of thinking and reacting,” Lenin explained. Pavlov was shocked. It seemed that Lenin wanted Pavlov to do to humanity what he did to dogs. “Do you really want to standardize the population of Russia? Make them act the same?” he asked Lenin. "Exactly!" - Lenin answered. “Man can be improved. A person can be whatever we want to make him.” Orlando Fidges. The tragedy of the people. Penguin Books. 1997 pp. 732-3.
Beginning in 1922, the increasingly worsening illness began to paralyze Lenin. He spent almost all of 1923 in a wheelchair, suffering from terrible headaches. In March 1923 he had a stroke and since then he could not speak normally. In the last months of his life, those who saw Lenin were horrified. His face took on a special expression and he looked half crazy. The last photo taken on the eve of his death was extremely creepy. Lenin died on January 21, 1924. The Bolsheviks organized a colossal funeral ceremony for Lenin. Leaders communist party They decided to embalm his body. This was of great importance to them. Among those who carried Lenin's coffin was the next dictator of Soviet Russia, Joseph Stalin.
________________________________________ ______
Translated by Ben Vladyko Translated by Ben Vladyko To reward - Give thanks:
SBERBANK - 63900263 9004435572 MAESTRO VALID THRU 12/17
WESTERN UNION- VLADYKO VENIAMIN VALENTINOVICH VYSHNY VOLOCHOK
KIWI - 7 915 29 44 42
________________________________________ _______The Russians explain:
Lenin is not Ulyanov. The first Lenin was killed by the Russians in 1918. The second Lenin - in the fall of 1920 (I don’t give a photo here). The third Lenin - in January 1924.
See for yourself what a fatted boar lies in the coffin. He definitely wasn't sick.
In fact, Lenin is a fictional character - a collective image. Based on publications in newspapers for 1917-1925, the events indicated in this video are known. During the famine in the Volga region, during the famine of 1920-23 "in separate winter months Up to one million people died per month.". This is exactly what was written in US newspapers of that period.
In general, Lloyd George gave an assessment of Russian losses in his famous speech. In his opinion, 25 million people were killed in Russia in the period 1917-1925.
The idea of the occupiers was this (as they wrote in the newspapers at that time): “After two weeks of hunger, a person turns into a beast. The beast will receive food from the hands of the owner and will become devoted to him. This will create a race of slaves from the Slavs, from the Russians. This experiment". That is why American stew and condensed milk were brought to the Volga region for the dying population - Amudsen and Co.
Lenin's corpse, which is now in the Mausoleum, must be identified and handed over to the United States. As far as criminologists know, he is a Jew, a US citizen.
Monuments to Lenin. These are monuments to a fictitious other image - a symbol of the struggle for freedom and independence of the population. You can also say it differently. These are monuments to the Russian Ulyanov, who was killed by the occupiers in order to use his name.
